How odd that soldiers kill things.
Darhling, you clearly didn't get the point of the post. I will spell it out for you:
It was about the REACTION of the people, who clearly cared about a puppy more than about the thousands of dead Iraqis...
How odd that soldiers kill things.
Oh, I see. This soldier was the spiritual successor to Mohammed, not just some grunt in the field. That makes all the difference. Off with his head, then.
Then don't distract me with talk of what Mohammed did with his cat. Or to his robe.
Are you seriously trying to tell us all, Sam, that a Muslim soldier has never killed an animal? Even for you, that is some stretch.
Just as mine was not a comment on the soldier himself, but on the posters who feel no shame about speaking of the way they'd mutilate a soldier for killing a dog, but couch their opposition to war in much more polite terms. It was a comment on what humans will (say) they will do when they feel they can without serious retribution.Darhling, you clearly didn't get the point of the post. I will spell it out for you:
It was about the REACTION of the people, who clearly cared about a puppy more than about the thousands of dead Iraqis...
Just as mine was not a comment on the soldier himself, but on the posters who feel no shame about speaking of the way they'd mutilate a soldier for killing a dog, but couch their opposition to war in much more polite terms. It was a comment on what humans will (say) they will do when they feel they can without serious retribution.
You see, it is not politically correct to talk about disembowelling someone who shoots at a family in a car who race through a checkpoint. It is not politically correct to speak of burning alive a man who beheads an aid worker. You speak of "punishment" for these.
But it is perfectly safe and acceptable to talk about how you'd like to see vultures feed on the intestines of a soldier who kills a puppy.
It's amusing. My comment was not on the post, or on the event. It was on the REACTION of those posters.
I imagine it is. Especially the aid workers - those are particularly deserving of divine retribution... by proxy.They behead Americans now and then. But thats not for fun, its a very serious business.
So if a Iraqi soldier killed a cat, would that make YouTube?so if instead of a puppy the soldier held an Iraqi terrorist and threw him like tha...would that get to the news?
A muslim Arab from Texas. The boy hasn't a prayer.Norse is an Arab from Texas, he is double whammied.
I imagine it is. Especially the aid workers - those are particularly deserving of divine retribution... by proxy.
A muslim Arab from Texas. The boy hasn't a prayer.
The human species has a history of bloodymindedness. I only wonder why you think your side is any better.He claims not to be a Muslim. Say your prayers immediately; atheists have a worse history of bloodymindedness!
The human race has a history of bloodymindedness. I only wonder why you think your side is any better.
I'm glad you agree. Neither "side" has any claim to a moral high ground at all.Yup, just like puppies and babies (aka collateral damages)
Just roll with it, then.I'm well rounded, I don't have any sides.
Just roll with it, then.
Humour aside, that is a lie.
So if a Iraqi soldier killed a cat, would that make YouTube?
I don't know does Iraq even have internet?
If you gained predominance, you would be the dark side.
That is the way the world works.
.... go away, boy. It's lost on you.I don't know does Iraq even have internet?