Tiberius1701 said:
Lori,
When I said that your statement about not creating someone is denying them something seemed comical to me, I was trying to convey to you how far from my conception it was. In retrospect, it sounded very insensitive and I shouldn't have phrased it that way - sorry.
That's ok...it wasn't
that insensitive. I wasn't offended at all. But thanks for the apology anyway...you seem very conscientious, and I like that.
As for choosing beliefs, I know the type of person you're talking about. Those who just reject something because they don't want to believe it. But I think you're not putting yourself in other people's shoes very well. To many people, Christianity seems as far off from reality as Hinduism probably seems to you.
For instance, if you died and then found out that Hinduism had it right and you're going to pay for not being a Hindu during your life, would you think that was reasonable or fair? Then they would say, ah yes, but you lived in a world full of Hindu teachings and you rejected them all, so you should have nothing to complain about.
Hinduism really doesn't seem so far off to me at all. Hinduism though is kind of the "opposite of" Christianity in a way...because Hinduism allows for all other religions and faiths to also be true. Which makes it a really bad example of what you're talking about...lol...but I still get your point.
While Hinduism is not exclusive at all, Christianity is completely exclusive...which is your point of contention here...but is also what made it stand out to me, when I was studying all of the major world religions. This exclusivity made me question it's validity more than any other religion that I studied. No other religion attests to God coming to earth in the form of a man. No other religion provides a Saviour in the form of God himself...or a Saviour at all...most others only provide doctrine that contains suggestions or rules for behaviour that is supposed to help you promote yourself...and provides nothing to be "saved" from. No other religion attests to this Holy Spirit and a personal relationship with God enabled through it...a communication by way of it between yourself and God Himself. No other religion attests to this spiritual rebirth that is no consequence of your own actions but only to seek God Himself, and so is a consequence of God's actions. All other religions attest to enlightenment being a consequence of things that you do yourself to achieve it. Most other religions promote controlling your behaviours and actions in life by your own will to achieve enlightenment, where as Christianity promotes completely giving up your will and your life to God in order to achieve enlightenment by His behaviours and actions presented to and through you...given this personal relationship that comes by rebirth and by His Spirit.
Of course, this would be unfair, for you did not grow up in a culture as familiar with Hinduism as with Christianity, so it probably just seems like some outside weird thing to you. We all have free will to choose between different options, but what we cannot control is our perception of the worthiness of those options. Maybe you could choose to live as an Islamist, but what you can't choose is your perception that Islam and Hinduism and Humanism are less true and less good of a choice. And, of course, we all choose what we believe to be the most beneficial choice.
I grew up in a culture that for the most part denies God entirely, except for when they want to take His name in vain, and use it to serve some selfish intention. At the very least, most people throw His name around in complete ignorance, without any true knowledge of Him at all. They may as well be talking about Elvis.
The question is why is your perception what it is? What makes it up and why is it that you perceive one choice as more benefical than another? You are saying that it is what you are exposed to through your culture or through a choice of particular doctrines given your exposure to those doctrines. I disagree with you when you say that you can not choose your perception...I see that people do this all of the time, in that they choose to believe what they want to believe for whatever reason. The reason being that, as you've stated, the beliefs seems most beneficial to them in some way, whether it's because it fits in with their culture or what society accepts, or because it's what their family dictates, or because it makes for a comfortable and desired lifestyle, or for whatever reason. And you see then that people then accept information that supports their chosen belief as true and reject information that is contradictory to it as false. And it creates a paradigm...a perception is a paradigm...that in no way has to be deemed to be the truth. In actuality, the nature of a paradigm works to inhibit the truth, because if one already believes that one has found the "truth", one ceases to find a logical reason to seek it, and so they cease to seek. It is possible though, for some bit of contradictory information to come along and intrude into your perception...like a fying pan to the head. This is called an epiphany, which changes your perception, and at the very least shifts your paradigm. If one is intelligent enough to apply reason in regards to an epiphany, they would then unsubscribe to their paradigm once and for all, realizing that they will never know all there is to know, and that it is never "correct" or beneficial to stop seeking the truth. After all, to live is to learn...to seek the truth is the meaning of life. Now
that is a perception you may want to hold on to...and
that is a perception that you can choose to have.
So, by the same token, when I look at Christianity, I have a certain perception of it, not unlike your perception of Satanism. I can't help the fact that this is my impression. I can listen to the arguments of people like yourselves, read, explore, consider carefully, etc. But my experiences are not your experiences and so the perception that forms in me of the value of these different choices is going to be different than yours. It is this perception we have of the relative values between the different options that we cannot control - it's not that nonbelievers are people of malintent, as you suggest.
Um...Satanism actually supports Christianity, as it is Christianity that defines Satan. Satanists are just choosing to play for the other team so to speak. But I get your point...lol.
And unless you live on a deserted island or in a cave somewhere, information containing the basic tenets of the Christian faith is widely available to anyone who may want to know about it, and in many different forms. As the world has gotten bigger and bigger in regards to population, it has at the same time grown smaller and smaller because of technology.
God is also no dummy in that He knows what you have been exposed to. He knows every little detail of your life experience and what it is that has made up your perceptions and why and He allows for all of this and takes all of it into account. He knows you better than you do...He made you.
And I don't want to label anyone's intentions as malicious. I don't want to judge anyone or come across as holier than thou. What I'm basing my arguement on is my own personal experience and how that allowed me to understand scripture that describes a certain spiritual law. I know that without a doubt, there was a time in my life when I did not want to know the truth. Did that make me a malicious person...evil? I don't know...I can certainly tell you that I didn't consider myself to be malicious or evil. I just didn't want to know because it was too consequential...it meant too much. I was afraid of what it would mean for me and my life. This life that I clinged to and that I did not want to give up...I did not want to give up control of. And as uncomfortable as this life of mine was, at the time I perceived it to be much more comfortable than what God would have for me if I gave my life to Him. Because I figured that if I had knowledge of Him...if I knew the truth about Him...that He actually did exist...it would only make sense to have to give a shit about what He wanted and what He determined to be right or wrong or good or bad. And what would that mean for my life? It was just way too consequential, and I just did not want to know...I was afraid that it would make my life bad, or boring, or hard. When ironically enough, my life
was bad and boring and hard...and now I know that it was because I
didn't know Him. It's funny. Knowing Him has been the opposite of what I expected back then.
What happened to me was that I got to a point in which I
had to know the truth about God regardless of the consequences...regardless of what it meant for me and for my life...my lifestyle...I didn't care about the consequences anymore...I had to know the truth. Whatever that meant for me was irrelevant, because I was willing to accept it, as long as I knew the truth.
When this happened, He showed Himself to me. And He taught me through this experience, and over the years that your sincere desire to know the truth, is what determines whether you know it or not. And that is what the scripture means that says "seek and you will find, knock and the door will be opened".
But see, this scripture is not referring to seeking doctrine, or knocking on the door of a particular church, mosque, or temple. It is referring to seeking of God Himself, and knocking on His door. See, knowledge of God is not revealed through doctrine, or history, or scripture, or organizations of men, or institutions. Knowledge of God is only revealed unto you through the Holy Spirit. Otherwise, with all of these other things, all you have is evidence that you may intellectualize. But with the Holy Spirit, you have proof, because of a personal spiritual interaction. THAT is knowledge, and anything else is conjecture.
And in realizing this, it makes the availability of the doctrine, or the organization supporting the doctrine, or the societal acceptance of the doctrine irrelevant. Because it is not a doctrine that you seek, but a Spirit...a real live Spirit that is everywhere, and all knowing, and available to everyone, regardless of their circumstance. So you could indeed be living on a deserted island or in a cave and still know God, if your perception is that you desire to know. As a matter of fact, I would argue that it is a person in this isolated circumstance who would actually be in a better position to have such a perception and to gain knowledge of God Himself because they would lack all of the distractions and the lies and coercive pressures that come with societal living. This isolated person could know God through the Holy Spirit without ever knowing that the Bible or a person named Jesus ever existed. But I tell you for sure that if they ever did become familiar with scripture, that they would know it was the truth. Why? Because it would confirm everything they already know about Him...from knowing Him personally...and from having Him counsel and teach them personally.
I know this because I have experienced it myself. I was never that knowledgeable regarding scripture myself, and when I had tried to read it, I didn't understand much of it at all. It just seemed very dry and irrelevant to me...I got nothing out of it. But the way it has worked since knowing Him, is that He will teach me something, and always through my life experience. And then when I have gained understanding of it, at some point in the future, I may see or hear scripture that confirms it, and I'll be like, "Oh, ok, I understand what that means." But only because I've lived it. So the dynamic regarding understanding scripture, if done correctly in rebirth, is actually backwards to what most people think it is.
But instead of really placing yourself in my shoes, you are conceptualizing the situation as though I were like you but behaving differently. In other words, you imagine what you would have to be like to do and say the things I am doing, and you imagine a person who is rejecting what they "know" to be right. But this is not the case. I am a person who is following what I truely believe is the right, just, and moral course of action.
I would contest that we are not all that different you and I...or anyone for that matter. As we all have different paths and different circumstances...there is only one universe and one planet that we all reside on for now...there is only one set of universal laws that we all live under...and there is only one God who created it all...and ourselves...and in His image. The difference right now between you and I is that you are relying on yourself, and I am relying on God.
You are not a person who really knows that Hinduism or Budhism is the right way but are rejecting it out of arrogance, pride, or evil are you? Certainly not, and most non-Christians are likewise not as you paint them.
I am aware of my own arrogance and pride, and I know that evil exists in this world...I have felt it's effect...in my own actions and intentions and in those of others as well. I know that I am no different from anyone else in this way.
Love,
Lori