The mind of a creationist
- Thread starter baftan
- Start date
Maybe you would like to tell us the differences of three types of realities on the basis of some concrete things other than philosophy. Because if you take this philo-way you can prove that we do not even exist.
I keep telling in this thread, as much as in similar others, humans can imagine non-existent things, this is their power of imagination, nothing else: Infinity, eternity, zero, philosophy, art, mathematics and others. They define "reality" with these mental thoughts. Yet there is a concrete reality as well, that we are made of atoms, and DNA; that we depend on material conditions. Your philosophical brain farting do not work over there. And I do not interest other things when I think of "reality". If I can not separate what is real and what is imagination, If understanding of reality and the creations of my human mind start to intertwine each other, so this is nothing but a disgrace to my understanding, disgrace to human mind.
Now, let's hear "your" argument about these "easily understandable" realities, but your's please, not "philosophically speaking" type of wiki-copy-paste-shit.
Whatever, let us know when you get out of sophomore philosophy.
But just to make you happy, if I'm programmed that only shifts the locus of the living being to the programmer, of whom I'm an extension.
However my awareness of my self being alive is more than sufficient for what I need to do.
You however are obviously just a bot, and not a very complex one at that.
Perhaps you'l like to talk with Eliza?
Then how do you know it was god?
You are mistaken.
No one can put together a definition which anal-idiot I mean analytic philosophers and scientists are happy with because life is sufficiently complex enough to escape easy linguistic definition if one tries to include every gray area.
But must people are quite satisfied "what I am a living part of."
So despite his feelings, he just doesn't know, which is often the case.
So dad is a psycho stalker.
What a sick manipulative fuck.
Yes, his loser psycho stalker dad who is trying to manipulate his son's life to assuage his guilt doesn't really care.
Way to make god seem even lamer than I had previously considered him.
I come from a social milieu where resentment is not considered a replacement for thinking. I am not really impressed by what I have seen of the movement called secular humanism. So I am the wrong person to ask this question. I think my bias is pretty evident. Without looking at anything written by the two examples and based on your admiration of their philosophies, I would ascertain that both individuals were dissatisfied with their lives and probably wanted to convince others to live as they do.
because of it's characteristics. what it was able to accomplish and how.
I did say no one answer to the question satisfies everyone. I am not mistaken and your opinion doesn't match the facts. Nice little twist in your post allowing you to get your point accross.
it's pretty fucking obvious earth, given the big picture. and i didn't decide what the characteristics were; i just observed them.
How is that obvious? Could you please explain in more detail...and with less fucks?
fuck is my favorite word.
to explain it in detail would take volumes and years, just from my perspective. but i can say that whatever it is, is not subject to the normal constraints of this world, including time. whatever it is, knows me better than i know myself. and whatever it is, has at it's disposal, everything, including the minds and bodies of humans. it doesn't lie. it doesn't exaggerate. it has no sympathy. and it is accomplishing a purpose, or a work, that has meaning. and that work, or meaning, is a perfection.
fuck is my favorite word.
to explain it in detail would take volumes and years, just from my perspective. but i can say that whatever it is, is not subject to the normal constraints of this world, including time. whatever it is, knows me better than i know myself. and whatever it is, has at it's disposal, everything, including the minds and bodies of humans. it doesn't lie. it doesn't exaggerate. it has no sympathy. and it is accomplishing a purpose, or a work, that has meaning. and that work, or meaning, is a perfection.
Thank you for answering my query for a detailed response with meaningless all encompassing drivel that really doesn't say anything at all. I am not trying to be a dick, I just think you are feeding me a bunch of B.S. because you yourself have no real answer.
nope. that's really and exactly what i observed. it's not my fault you don't like my answer.
All you did was give me a general and bland definition of god....you didn't give any detailed characteristics whatsoever.....Why?
The computer is running a program enabling it to masquerade as God and the Devil through its CGI to any organic brain. The machine is a bigot and the biggest liar on the planet.
You aren't going to find humans any other planet other than earth. Man wasn't created in the image of God rather the machine copies the appearance of man. God isn't from this planet and everyone takes that for granted.
Your concept of time and the machine's capability is nonsense.
i gave you characteristics. they just don't appeal to the five senses that you're so familiar with. i've posted a lot about the details of my experiences out here. you can look through my posts if you're really interested.
listen earth, i don't know what the fuck is going on with you and your alien lying machine and the holy spirit up your nose. but suffice it to say, with no disrespect, that we're just not going to agree about this ok? we are on two totally different pages.