who's responsible sam?So the police came in dressed in riot gear and tasered the 11 year old kid?
And that indicates responsible behaviour on the part of the cops?
Can you even hear yourself?
who's responsible sam?So the police came in dressed in riot gear and tasered the 11 year old kid?
And that indicates responsible behaviour on the part of the cops?
Can you even hear yourself?
who's responsible sam?
wrong again sam. she was refusing to exit the vehicle.
and like i said earlier cops aren't mind readers, they had no idea if she had a gun within reach.
are you even following along?She is responsible...she did upheld the law.
She did not think of the baby, but of herself, went against the law.
the police officers did not act in courteous way towards the woman.
after pureeing her ass with a chainsaw.They should have just shot her dead, huh?
wrong again sam. she was refusing to exit the vehicle.
and like i said earlier cops aren't mind readers, they had no idea if she had a gun within reach.
are you even following along?
my question "who's responsible" is for the 11 year old retard.
But she didn't.
Being a cop is a dangerous profession. If you're scared pregnant women will shoot you, so scared that you have to electrocute them, maybe you shouldn't be a cop?
if the school was doing it's job the situation would never have occured but like all numbnuts you claim it's the cops fault. get a life sam and stop dealing in sensationalism.Who cares who's responsible for the "retard"?
The cops are responsible for their own behaviour.
if the school was doing it's job the situation would never have occured but like all numbnuts you claim it's the cops fault. get a life sam and stop dealing in sensationalism.
out of all the evidence presented in this thread only one, one mind you, i feel was unjustified. even that one may have been justified i don't know cause i wasn't there.
the way you present it? yes.So you consider cops tasering an 11 year old "retard" as sensationalism?
yes they are.And aren't the cops supposed to assess a situation before taking any action?
were you there? how do you know the specifics?Or do they just go in and start shooting with stun guns to resolve ANY situation?
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1204833&postcount=50the way you present it? yes.
yes they are.
were you there? how do you know the specifics?
wrong again sam, i do care. read the evidence sam. ALL of these people were resisting in some manner. the ONLY exception is the guy on the gurney.Why bother? Its pretty obvious that you don't give a damn what the cops do, or to whom.
more sensationalism. read the evidence sam.You're so desensitized it doesn't even bother you that pregnant women, elderly people and children are electrocuted by trained law enforcement officers on flimsy pretexts. This, in your fantasy world, is justice.
only because you aren't a cop.I consider it disproportionate abuse of power.
are you even following along?
my question "who's responsible" is for the 11 year old retard.
what's this got to do with anything?
oopsie...
draqon, you're totally nuts but very sweet.