Police brutes
SamCDKey said:
What if its a person who is unwell? Can the police tell the difference?
Leopold99 said:
yes they can. if they are ranting and raving and not obeying the cops directions then they are ill, in fact they are crazy.
I must disagree with Leopold; specifically, either the police cannot tell when someone is not well, or they can and simply don't care. Recently, police
arrested a 20 year-old with Down's syndrome for domestic violence. She was booked initially on $10,000 bail, though the judge lowered that to $150. Even the woman's "victim" disagrees with the arrest:
Perkins said her daughter shouldn't have been locked up.
"They asked me to write a statement," said Perkins, who has a second daughter with autism. "I said I would not write a statement. I didn't feel threatened (by Wallis) in any way, shape or form."
The state's domestic violence laws require officers to arrest an aggressor if they have good reason to believe someone has assaulted a relative, Everett police Lt. Chris Andersen said. (Seattle Post-Intelligencer)
In arresting the girl and demanding $10,000 bail, the fact of her Down's syndrome was overlooked. Either the cops couldn't figure it out, or they just didn't care.
In lighter news, a courthouse marshall in Everett, Washington, walked over my daughter last week and told me to keep control of her. Since I had hold of the child at the time, I asked him what he thought I was doing, and his response was that if I was going to sass him, I could leave the courthouse. (Yes, he actually said, "If you're going to sass me.") In Everett, authority is pretty stupid; badges seem to mean that you don't have to watch where you're walking, and the really fun part comes when you get to arrest the retards.
Now, I've seen people who
aren't cops take it under difficult circumstances. I once watched a severely-disturbed junior high school student try to beat the crap out of the vice-principal. The man was 6'4, over 200 pounds, and he just stood there and took it. (This kid was
not a threat, in his opinion.) And I admire him for that decision. Tasers weren't big at the time, so I guess the cops would have just shot the poor kid.
To the other, police have many strange pressures to deal with. Several years ago, the Seattle Police Department handled a crazy man with a sword the calm, rational way. They tried everything, including gas and hoses. In the end, they got him, alive, well, and shaking cold. It took eleven hours. The public outcry was amazing, and SPD has since accommodated the demand, preferring instead to simply shoot the insane. ("If they look at you, kill 'em.")
I prefer nonlethal solutions, but these require a certain amount of unique discretion, especially something like a Taser. The attitudes of law enforcement in this area presents a sticky compromise: they may be brutal idiots, so Tasers and gas are a godsend compared to just shooting people.
Police
should be able to make certain distinctions regarding the people and suspects they encounter, but that makes the job harder and takes all the fun out of it.