Do it within reason. Don't mess things up for the rest of us.
How many people here like to see public displays of affection?
... I mean holding hands, walking arm in arm, hugging in public, even gentle kisses is ok, but where should people draw the line?
Of course we should allow public displays of affection, within reason. Surely we want to be a kind and civilized society? So why should we hide, that many married, or soon-to-be-married, opposite-sex couples are in love?
I don't see extended kissing, looking like sexual foreplay, to be appropriate. But affection kissing should be fine. I don't really like kissing so much, seems unsanitary, so most kissing should be limited to one's mate.
Breastfeeding babies in public should be deemed okay, as its very good for people to be welcoming their babies to come to life, people eat in public, breastfeeding in public is commonplace in developing countries still more pronatalist than us, and we in the U.S. don't breastfeed enough I see from looking at the statistics. I hear people from developing countries criticise us Americans for thinking breasts are sexual. Well maybe for Americans, they are, but surely we can "overlook" it, and ignore, don't stare, if there is a baby there to explain for the "exposure."
Lots of people enjoy having sex in places where they could get caught, (its a excitment thing) i.e parks, car parks, even bushes, should they be allowed to be able have sex outide?
I know that it is against the law in UK, but that doesnt stop some people.
Your thoughts
Well of course people should be allowed to enjoy sex outside, provided it's in some place where a married couple would reasonably sleep together, say like in a tent at a campground, or in some poorly furnished overcrowded refugee camp at night. Presumably, they should try a little to keep their "animal sounds" or "nature's music" of human reproduction, quiet enough so that not too many neighbors hear? And I do believe parents have every right/expectation to enjoy sex with their children around, if there's no reasonable way to be away from them, say like in developing countries where an entire family may sleep in a room or two, or while thinking the children in the tent or motel room, probably are asleep? What should be shunned, is the unnatural anti-life use of "birth control."
And I do think that sex in the great outdoors, would hardly be obscene or a sin, provided its in some reasonable place reasonably unlikely to be visited by other people. Say like being stranded upon some deserted island, or on a deserted beach that isn't so popular that somebody would come by every few minutes. I really don't think the wild animals would take any offense at seeing humans naturally mate. It would look quite "natural" to them.