Coming from someone who thinks Santa Claus is real - that is very funny.But your worldview is delusional.
Coming from someone who thinks Santa Claus is real - that is very funny.
So you - by denying and rejecting Capracus, your God - have become atheist?No you don’t.
You deny and reject God.
That’s why you’re an atheist.
Love it. So other people are delusional. And you think Santa Claus is real.Are you seriously telling me that Santa Claus isn’t a real character?
www.sciforums.com/threads/religious-nonsense.161034/page-13#post-3536235And what is it you recall from that discussion?
He is as real a character as God. A concept, invented by man, mistaken for real by wishful thinkers.Are you seriously telling me that Santa Claus isn’t a real character?
He is as real as God is.Are you seriously telling me that Santa Claus isn’t a real character?
It's your job to make your argument, not my job to look "a few pages back" to find it for you.There's no point discussing this if you would rather whinge than actually read anything. It's all there, a few pages back. I just checked.
At this stage, my argument is that you are too sloth to stay abreast of your own arguments. If you find it wearisome to trudge back through your dullardry to recall what you've said, you can't really blame anyone else if the gradient for progressive discourse becomes steeply uphill and impossible for you to navigate.It's your job to make your argument, not my job to look "a few pages back" to find it for you.
And this proves what? That Tiassa had an objection to my perspective and delivery of arguments why I think that religions are nonsense and dangerous nonsense at that.
And is that god the same as your god?You see you know there is a god, but you are in denial. Which is why you have to refer to God as “my God.
That your source material for understanding broader events in the world remains catastrophically half-arsed. Case in point when you have nothing to cite beyond your perceived victimhood when the chips are down on your ideas about religion, sociology etc. As it was suggested, if its really a case of an eye for an eye, why do you make such a public show of gouging yourself?And this proves what? .
I don't consider myself a victim at all. These things happened long ago and I have adjusted nicely.That your source material for understanding broader events in the world remains catastrophically half-arsed. Case in point when you have nothing to cite beyond your perceived victimhood when the chips are down on your ideas about religion, sociology etc. As it was suggested, if its really a case of an eye for an eye, why do you make such a public show of gouging yourself?
By the same shortcomings, you could just as easily claim to be the president to the same end.I don't consider myself a victim at all. These things happened long ago and I have adjusted nicely.
The problem is that religions have not adjusted one iota and are as corrupt as they always were.
If you come here with "Tales of the Greatest Story ever Told", I'll tell you it is the greatest bullshit story ever told and you cannot prove me wrong.
The difference is that I don't, because I cannot prove that, just as you cannot prove anything of what you say. Yet you persist in trying to defend an indefensible position.By the same shortcomings, you could just as easily claim to be the president to the same end.
Its strange that you say you have no position to defend, and then proceed to defend a position by the same schlockery as last time.The difference is that I don't, because I cannot prove that, just as you cannot prove anything of what you say. Yet you persist in trying to defend an indefensible position.
And, on top of that you resort to character assassination of individuals who dare argue with Your Story, ad hominem after ad hominem, ......how Trumpian.
Here is a jew's perspective on the OT. Watch it, it's really informative....
lewis black explains religion
and for an encore you may seriously hate this Carlin clip :
George Carlin - advertising and bull shit
which also touches on the God problem.
And is that god the same as your god?
You see, in the absence of any definition of God, anything can be a god.
I say Mathematics are my god it is a metaphor for your understanding.
He is as real as God is.