Am I missing something or is that a mathematical impossibility?
Prove that I am not God
- Thread starter Capracus
- Start date
I thought I was stating your position.......yes....the burden of proof used to feel almost like a carrying a cross......sooo heavy....
You can only guess my position, and that has to be based on your position. A person who actively denies and reject God.
Jan.
Without “1” there is no mathematics.
All math is based around “1”.
God is One, without a Second.
Capracus, in trying to be clever, gave a good definition of God, because he knows, at least innately, he his part and parcel of God.
Your protest only serves to reveals your denial and rejection of God.
Jan.
Do you mean 1 without 2, a unit of time, or both?
So Capracus is you.
How come you can't make sense when you post, then?
We noticed.
That's kind of an ongoing theme - the one thread, and in its way this split thread, were both launched in a good faith attempt to rectify that bs situation.
At the time, there were still posters here willing to deal with you as if you were capable of posting in good faith.
Last edited:
2 is two ones.
So if God is 1, God is 1, and 2.
But 2 is not one.
God is 7 billion.
But 7 billion is not God.
Jan.
I got a feeling that line of argument is not going to convince a bank teller.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
No, I have your position pegged. You actively accept and promote God.
The difference is; my denial and rejection is based on lack of proof of the existence of a God, while your acceptance and promotion of is based on the same lack of proof of the existence of a God.
Guess who has accepted the correct "initial" position?
Last edited:
You’re an atheist, I’m a theist.
You deny God, I accept God.
You don’t believe in God, I believe in God.
Jan.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
And neither of us is able to provide proof of the existence of God, let alone being God.
My position is one of reason, yours is one of faith. I submit yours is harder to defend...
But then, being filled with the holy spirit, you will defend being God until your last breath.
Problem is that there is a medical term for your condition.
Last edited:
How can you claim to accept God, after denying Capracus?
And neither of us is able to provide proof of the existence of God, let alone being God.
My position is one of reason, yours is one of faith. I submit yours is harder to defend...
But then, being filled with the holy spirit, you will defend being God until your last breath.
Problem is that there is a medical term for your condition.
You already know God Is, but you’re in denial.
You have accepted “ there is no God”, and as such can’t believe in God (atheist).
This is your current position.
Jan.
323 most recently.
Without evidence or argument, of course.
But now you reverse yourself, and accept God.
Again, without evidence or argument.
Write4U
Valued Senior Member
The difference in our position is that I am rational and you are not......
And I have made my position on the properties of a "Guiding Equation" very clear. I know this part is absolutely correct. It's mathematical in "essence" and I am a mathematical pattern, I am a physical expression of my God.
See, I believe! Now are you going to tell me I am worshipping the wrong God?
If so, do tell me where my acceptance (faith) in the "mathematical function" fails.
Last edited:
What is that supposed to mean?
The difference in our position is that I am rational and you are not......
Your an atheist.
You’re in denial.
All your defences serve to justify your worldview.
You think you’re being rational, because you need to appear rational. You think this goes a long way to doing that.
But your worldview is delusional.
You see you know there is a god, but you are in denial. Which is why you have to refer to God as “my God.
No you don’t.
You deny and reject God.
That’s why you’re an atheist.
You’re in denial.
I’m not concerned with your mathematical function.
Jan.