craterchains (Norval said:
Arch Rival
If you actually read the posts above your very first time you even asked that question, you would have noted that it was all ready answered. Besides as this is the ALIEN WAR TACTICS thread and not entirely about Cunningham / Smart types of crater chains but also inclusive of all possible evidence and discussion of such. That includes radiation readings of many places all over our solar system besides Mars.
Hahaa.....No, Norval. You didn't answer the question. But then, this is a familiar drill for you, isn't it? Evading questions by insisting they have been answered before?
Of course you would like to evade the questions. The reason is plain and simple: you haven't the intellectual capacity to answer them.
Do you require a reminder of how many questions you evaded?
You will get one anyway.
For the benefit of those who didn't look through the links i posted, allow me to give a glimpse into what is happening at other forums.
"Craterchains, thank you for addressing all the points and questions people directed at you. It was very forthcoming and professional of you to do so. Watching this flow of information between you and the others here has shown me that you are indeed a reasonable and polite person who truely believes what he says and offers proof and evidence to those that doubt. You are certainly not to be confused with those others who merely repeat the same things over and over with no regard for other people's posts. You certainly cannot be said to have ignored questions repeatedly. You have answered every apparent contradiction with dignity and, in the end, you have shown that your hypothesis is the most likely one for this phenomena. Your data and evidence have convinced me beyond a doubt that you are corect."
-Musashi
This response was a sacastic remark addressed to Norval. The context can be found here:
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=13844&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=150
"You've continued to ignore everything that everyone in this thread has patiently explained to you. You've learned nothing, and you still apparently do not even understand why your "work" is incapable of convincing anyone of anything. You also appear to fail to understand (or at least, are unwilling to recognize or admit you understand) what you need to do in order to produce work that could even be worthy of discussion."
-aurora
http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=13844&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=100
Enjoy the quote of the day. A taste of things to come.