Osama Bin Laden is Dead

Only if your take the "alleged fact" of his dieing 8 years ago as requiring explanation.

When what it actually requires is some evidence that it isn't total bullshit.

Well, yes, that's a given, hence it being a conspiracy theory.
 
All you need is a bunch of people chanting - my government would never lie to me.

And since nobody is doing that - since every adult American knows full well of various times their government has lied to them - your picture exists in your own head, as an ugly strawman of an entire nationality, employed to buttress nasty bigoted views of such.

You should try to develop some sense of shame.
 
Oh man #chan is on fire with this stuff!

ea73e867-512a-4bfe-8130-a5daeb64721d.gif
 
The only people seen by the locals were two men, who spoke Pashto and were considered by the locals as Pakistanis.
Probably the two couriers that were used to find the compound in the first place.
 
More to the point, the President is willing to stake his reputation on such a claim. Such being a far greater display of confidence than any assertions here, from anonymous people with somewhere between little and nothing to lose for being shown to be incorrect.

I can't wait for Osama to debunk his own death, it would be a great victory for Al Quida.
 
And since nobody is doing that - since every adult American knows full well of various times their government has lied to them

Do they? I see a lot of faith on display these last two days:

bp16.jpg


These people don't need any proof, they have no doubts. All the grand poobah has to do is announce Mission Accomplished.


The doubters? They are the "fringe", the conspiracy theorists.
 
These people don't need any proof, they have no doubts.

You don't know that, in the first place. It isn't something that one can determine from a photograph. That you'd presume to judge the mental faculties and gullibility of an entire nation from a photograph of a few people says a lot about you, and none of it pleasant. You're apparently just projecting an ugly strawman onto any image at hand, and somehow expecting that to impress others.

In the second place, the absense of evidence that would rise to your (obviously stilted) standard of "proof" doesn't mean that anyone's trust in government is uncritical. One can easily discern how badly things would go for Obama if this is shown to be bullshit - which it would be, in short order, if bullshit it is - and safely assume that Obama knows all of that. Putting that all together, along with Obama's generally good reputation for honesty, and you get a high degree of credibility, and not just amongst Americans. Plenty of people all over the world are taking this news at face value, after all.

All the grand poobah has to do is announce Mission Accomplished.

He has to do so credibly. And he has. But, indeed, there is necessarily an element of trust and credibility involved in the publicization of information coming from an active war, especially when it comes to black ops.

It's possible - heck, outright likely - that we're not hearing the entire story, and that elements are being sexed up or otherwise painted in a certain light. We've seen this happen repeatedly before, with Jessica Lynch and Pat Tillman. And we've already seen it here, with the conflicting reports about human shields and so on. But I see little reason to seriously doubt the basic facts presented (OBL in Abbottabad compound, tracked there by couriers, killed by a SEAL team, ID confirmed by facial recognition, eyewitness and DNA, body dumped into sea).

The doubters? They are the "fringe", the conspiracy theorists.

That's correct. There are, as of yet, no good reasons to doubt the major elements of the story as presented. Those who go to great lengths to cook up such doubts on spurious bases, are indeed conspiracy theorists whom nobody has much of any reason to care about the opinions of.

And let me emphasize - for about the 20th time in this thread - that there is no visible correlation between that fringe and any particular nationality.
 
Last edited:
Completely agree. So what is his credibility based on?

Asked and answered, repeatedly. Most recently, in the exact post that you quoted there. You are clearly not engaging in good faith, here.

What is your credibility based on? Why should anyone listen to your input, on anything?
 
@Sam

What bullshit! This is proof of how little you know of Americans anywhere in the country. You know I spent the last few months in of all places Columbus, Georgia, its a garrison town (fort benning). You would be shocked at how many service men and locals from Georgia who are southern, conservative and proud are critical and skeptical of their government. Not in every instance as you would have it, but people who have long been unsatisfied with what they deem washington 'incompetence' and State lies (yes like the weapons of mass destruction). Some of them hate Obama but surprisingly there were many who felt he wasn't being treated fairly but that's neither here nor there. My point is that what you would like is for people to HATE their government and hate the U.S (maybe even the west). These people are not 'fringe' nor are they conspiracy theorists, which tells me you don't really understand what conspiracy theory actually refers to or implies. People who doubt their government whether they be right or left is practically an american tradition. There are still many who are reeling from all the lies told by the Bush administration and the lies that landed us into a long war. But guess what Sam, the alternative would have been something like 'we have to do something about Bin Laden and the rise of extremism and terrorist training grounds but we don't need two full scale war to do it!'. In short they would have still crossed borders to kill Bin Laden and destroy terrorist outposts a la Mossad, exactly the way they achieved success in this operation. If they had gone that route there probably would have been no war in Iraq but Afghanistan and Pakistan would still have to be dealt with.
 
Osama's final moments captured on Twitter

Not the article I originally read - however, it seems to contain much of the same information regarding the courier and his brother (probably the people S.A.M mentioned).
Get the courier, get Osama - how CIA made the break

He liveblogged a raid [but saw nothing] we have the pictures of the crashed helicopter on the site. However, we have no explanation why this Pakistani helicopter had crashed on the site. Haven't we been told that the Pakistanis knew nothing and were not involved? Meanwhile the mysterious US chopper which had technical difficulties - thus preventing the transport of the anonymous wife and equally anonymous 8?9? children of Easter Osama - is nowhere to be seen.
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't it be in our interest to keep Osama out there as a boogeyman?

Don't you get it yet? If Osama is dead then we keep him alive as a boogeyman, if he's alive we are lying to advance ourselves, if we are in Afghanistan we are evil but if we leave Afghanistan then we would have destroyed their country. The only thing that would make Sam happy is if the government dissolved and all americans blew themselves up so that they don't stain the earth with their presence. Oh yeah and we would have to take the Israeli's or Jews or Hebrews or Zionists..nah just all jews with us.

You know like that happy go lucky Ghandi had advised:

“I would challenge Hitler to shoot me or cast me into the dungeon,” Gandhi wrote in his article. “I would not wait for fellow Jews to join me in civil resistance, but would have confidence that in the end the rest are bound to follow my example … Suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy.”

Happy happy joy joy! :rolleyes:
 
He liveblogged a raid [but saw nothing]...
Reuters wrote the headline, not me - you may have noticed that in both cases I simply copied and pasted the headlines of the articles as the link titles.

Also, you seem to be under the impression that I linked to it because it proved something, I didn't, I linked to it, because, for a number of reasons, I found it mildly amusing.
 
Asked and answered, repeatedly. Most recently, in the exact post that you quoted there. You are clearly not engaging in good faith, here.

What is your credibility based on? Why should anyone listen to your input, on anything?

I'm not asserting any credibility here. You are free to take all the statements for what they are worth

I'm simply stating

1. There is no body

2. There is no independent observer who can claim to have seen the body

3. There is no independent observer who has seen bin Laden in Abbottabad

4. There is no proof of life or death

These facts stand by themselves

What do we have?

1. A crashed helicopter which locals claim is Pakistani and Americans claim is American

2. Pictures of a house raided with what look like blood stains

What we are told:

1. there is a wife - no one has seen her or claimed to have seen her except anonymous sources. She has no name, age, photo or identity

2. 8 or 9 children who never played or went to school in their locality - who were never seen by anyone

3. Two men who were identified from different places in Pakistan by locals - also anonymous and now missing

4. Two neighbours taken from their farm by US troops - also missing

In fact EVERY single person connected with the case is either missing or anonymous or in custody or dead.

You can follow the tweets from local journalists here and here

al Jazeera is live blogging it here
 
Well, yes, that's a given, hence it being a conspiracy theory.

You can perhaps see where it's kinda screwy to start from a position that an unsubstantiated rumor is true, and then demand a factual explanation for its implications. The implied standard of evidence there is stilted on its face - it's only useful as a tactic for browbeating people who don't notice the ridiculously selective application of skepticism.
 
Back
Top