perhaps for one who balks at application ....No. but if you want to determine who is qualified to talk about god, you will have no choice but to base your decision on faith. .
perhaps for one who balks at application ....No. but if you want to determine who is qualified to talk about god, you will have no choice but to base your decision on faith. .
Exactly.if you can't provide anything to your claim of perception except faith, there is no need
No, you started the reply.. then quit.I have this aspect to my existence called "real life"
No. but if you want to determine who is qualified to talk about god, you will have no choice but to base your decision on faith.
Frankly, I think this is something a lazy victim would say.
At some point, indulging in relativism and indecision begins to be too demeaning to put up with it any longer.
Someone who actually enjoys being helpless.
It seems to be quite common, actually.
because you don't have a processExactly.
And why is that ?
exactlyNo, you started the reply.. then quit.
What process ?because you don't have a process
I was just asking because I thought it was weird :shrug:exactly
I didn't think you would appreciate half a reply ....you might interpret it as an inability to answer your argument or something
Because they are helpless or believe they are helpless.
Laziness and helplessness are not mutually exclusive.
never encountered a normative description in theistic literature?What process ?
Show me how the woodpixies differ from your God.
Of course they are not mutually exclusive, but they seems to be when describe the same process.
If someone considers his-/herself a victim, he/she won't be lazy about it.
If they are lazy about it they are not considering themselves to be a victim
Never underestimate the appeal of feeling helpless.
How is being helpless lazy again ?
I suggest you spend a year or so in Kenya or Darfur or Zimbabwe
He could do it, yes.
But a high-school student does not have the expertise to know why the way he arrived at the results is a correct way to arrive at those results.
To know something to be a truth, one also needs to know why their presumed knowledge isn't simply a lucky guess.