More Ukrainian Events

All people who speak Russian from former Soviet states can become Russian citizens. The difference between a Russian and a Ukrainian is merely academic.

Well there is a difference between "can become" and "are". I can become a Russian citizen too. So does that make the distinction between the US government and the Russian Federation "merely academic". I don't think so.
 
I doubt Biden would say that to his face, and by the way no one has a soul.

Well Biden says he did. Who was there, you or Biden? You can doubt a lot of things, but it doesn't mean your doubts are justified. Knowing what I know of Biden's "back slapping" personality, I think it is totally consistent with Biden.
 
You mean like how we annexed Texas from Mexico?

NO, I mean like you need to beef up on your American history - among other things. Texas was an independent republic with its own president for 10 years prior to being annexed by The United States, that annexation was done at the behest of the Republic of Texas. And that annexation occurred 169 years ago, long before the US became a global super power.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Texas
 
Most likely, yes. The terrain and the tracks are almost identical, with a few mew tracks added in the later picture.

curiously (there's that word again)
I saw/see more tracks in the supposedly 'earlier' picture than in the "later" one.
Eye of the beholder?
 
More like a throwback to Communism than Nazi. Putin was in the KGB before he was "elected" president.
 
curiously (there's that word again)
I saw/see more tracks in the supposedly 'earlier' picture than in the "later" one.
Eye of the beholder?

Hmm. I ran the brightness up and down on the photo and I could identify every single existing track in the second picture.
 
If I am correct, obligations like that carry a big risk. And Ukraine isn't repaying this back with their economy.

Not really, Ukraine has an almost 200 billion dollar economy. Its public debt is only 12 billion dollars. Ukraine has plenty of room to borrow more, much more, and it has the ability to pay it back. What the US loan guarantee does for Ukraine, is it allows them to borrow money at very low interest rates. Additionally now that Ukraine has overthrown its corrupt Russian overlords, it has the ability to grow faster and become a more modern country.

And not paying the US government, should it come to that, would be devestating for Ukraine.

More sanctions against Mother Russia were just announced a few minutes ago. And the noose tightens on Mr. soulless.
 
NO, I mean like you need to beef up on your American history - among other things. Texas was an independent republic with its own president for 10 years prior to being annexed by The United States, that annexation was done at the behest of the Republic of Texas. And that annexation occurred 169 years ago, long before the US became a global super power.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Texas
What difference does that make? It took a war with Mexico to keep it.
 
What difference does that make? It took a war with Mexico to keep it.

Gee, I don't know. :) Annexing an independent democratic republic which existed as such for 10 years and which pettitioned the US for annexation, isn't the same as forcibly annexing a country against the will of said citizens. And as I previously wrote, the US was not a world power at the time. It was a backwater. The big military powers were in Europe. At that time the US was a young fledgling country. Mexico had recognized Texas as an independent state in the years preceeding the Mexican American War.

And let me remind you, the issue here was my statement powerful countries don't forcibly annex their neighbors and your use of Texas in an attempt to refute that claim. The annexation of Texas wasn't by any stretch forcible. The US didn't forcibly annex Texas nor was the US a powerful country by the standards of that time. And let's not forget, that event happened nearly 2 centuries ago.
 
The whole reason why Ukraine illegitimate forces had this missile hit the civilian aircraft was to discredit the rebels and have them labeled as "terrorists" in international community. The civilian aircraft was purposely changed course to an area of warzone. It's like Nazis putting an innocent child in the middle of the warzone and making sure he is used as a human shield and will get hit and than going to international community and saying "its their bullet that killed them, bomb them".

I doubt that's the case. What's more likely is the Rebels assumed that was a US AWACS using a 777 fuselage, when they shot it down they realised their error. (I'm sure AWACS would of had countermeasures)

As for the blame game, the Aircraft was heading from WNW to ESE, that meant it was heading from Ukrainian positions (and the West in general) to rebel held locations. If the Ukrainian government had been responsible, they would of been shooting at planes going the other direction (or from ENE), so it was most definitely Rebels that were responsible.
 
More like a throwback to Communism than Nazi. Putin was in the KGB before he was "elected" president.

I wouldn't even suggest Communism, this is something more personal for Putin I think. It is sad to see however that a few decades of progress can be undermined within just a few years.
 
I doubt that's the case. What's more likely is the Rebels assumed that was a US AWACS using a 777 fuselage, when they shot it down they realised their error. (I'm sure AWACS would of had countermeasures)

As for the blame game, the Aircraft was heading from WNW to ESE, that meant it was heading from Ukrainian positions (and the West in general) to rebel held locations. If the Ukrainian government had been responsible, they would of been shooting at planes going the other direction (or from ENE), so it was most definitely Rebels that were responsible.

The "rebels" claim they thought it was a Ukranian cargo aircraft.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-came-bodies-children-not-military-crew.html
 
Gee, I don't know. :) Annexing an independent democratic republic which existed as such for 10 years and which pettitioned the US for annexation, isn't the same as forcibly annexing a country against the will of said citizens. And as I previously wrote, the US was not a world power at the time. It was a backwater. The big military powers were in Europe. At that time the US was a young fledgling country. Mexico had recognized Texas as an independent state in the years preceeding the Mexican American War.

And let me remind you, the issue here was my statement powerful countries don't forcibly annex their neighbors and your use of Texas in an attempt to refute that claim. The annexation of Texas wasn't by any stretch forcible. The US didn't forcibly annex Texas nor was the US a powerful country by the standards of that time. And let's not forget, that event happened nearly 2 centuries ago.
Texas stole it from Mexico by force and we added it to the US a little later. Mexico didn't acknowledge Texas independence. Same thing if the Russian/Ukrainian separatists steal it from Ukraine and then Russia annexes it.

Hey, I can also add New Mexico and most of California, stolen by the force known as the Mexican-American War.
 
Texas stole it from Mexico by force and we added it to the US a little later. Mexico didn't acknowledge Texas independence. Same thing if the Russian/Ukrainian separatists steal it from Ukraine and then Russia annexes it.

Hey, I can also add New Mexico and most of California, stolen by the force known as the Mexican-American War.

Yeah you can do a lot things, but that doesn't' mean they make sense. I suggest you stop digging your hole.

Texans fought a revolutionary war with Mexico and won 10 years before pettioning the US for annexation. The annexation of Texas was peaceful. Just admit it, you screwed up again.
 
Yeah you can do a lot things, but that doesn't' mean they make sense. I suggest you stop digging your hole.

Texans fought a revolutionary war with Mexico and won 10 years before pettioning the US for annexation. The annexation of Texas was peaceful. Just admit it, you screwed up again.
Denial. It was peaceful because the war was already lost.
Having recently attained Independence from Spain in 1821, Mexico was fraught with internal struggles that verged on civil war, however it was relatively united in refusing to recognize the independence of Texas. Mexico threatened war with the United States if it annexed Texas.[7](wikipedia)

"The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo specified the major consequence of the war: the forced Mexican Cession of the territories of Alta California and New Mexico to the United States in exchange for $15 million."
Wikipedia
 
Denial. It was peaceful because the war was already lost.



Wikipedia

Yeah, it was peaceful because the annexation was not coherced, Texans wanted annexation after 10 years of independence. And the US government had no part in the Texas revolution or in the peace Texas made with Mexico. Keep digging ;)
 
Last edited:
All people who speak Russian from former Soviet states can become Russian citizens. The difference between a Russian and a Ukrainian is merely academic.

why don't you do yourself a favor and just stop talking before you make your self look like more of an idiot or a racist. first you claim that most ukraians speak russian they don't and than you try as youreyes did erase their national identity. this may be hard for you to accept but ukranians aren't russians they are ukrainians. continuing to miniamialize their ethnic identity doesn't make look smart or well informed just the opposite. most of the people in Ukraine who speak russian are ethnically russian.
 
Back
Top