Mississippi Republicans and Miscegenation

[quinnsong]

When we are discussing race of course we screen out the individual, they're only the exceptions that prove the rule.

If only I had a dollar for every time some ignorant white liberal posted the face of a black man with a career as evidence that race doesn't exist or that all blacks have the same level of intelligence as whites I'd be, well, you know... rich.

You can understand that posting details of a white athlete in some ridiculous attempt to suggest that all the top athletes are white or that whites dominate athletics or possess the same level of athletic ability as blacks would be absurd.

How blacks are treated by whites in Western society - whether they are used as slaves on a plantation or promoted via affirmative action to prominent social/political positions is only a barometer of the interests and goals of whites. It has nothing to do with nature (except in how an alpha group controls and exploits a beta) as that hasn't changed in millions of years and certainly not in the last few centuries.

Oh my goodness, I am trying to stop my fingers from writing this but they will not stop! Must be my inferior breeding! Empty you have a clear case of penis envy. Did some mandingo steal your blonde and blue-eyed wifey, the solution is a penis enhancer not race hating!

 

[EmptySky]

You also don't seem to have simply been around enough people who don't share your skin color...because you seem to think we have to be indoctrinated to think this way.

In the first instance, the claim that familiarity with something prevents you from objective discrimination is not supported by any logic I know of. Secondly, the belief that the social world you inhabit ocurred naturally and is not the by product of the economic and political goals of other minds/forces/nations is naieve in the extreme.

When you grow up knowing people of different colors as people, they are just people, and I'm sorry you're too mired in your way of thinking to see that.

Certainly a confirmation of a simpletons way of thinking and an excellent example that behaving like a herd animal will inevitably dull your senses and your mind.

People are never just 'themselves', as no thing is just 'itself', but a multiplicity of other things connected in a complex web to a wider world. That probably bothers you but as I said earlier you are in the fortunate position of living in the modern, liberal world where you can dismiss my views as the rantings of some redneck racist, turn off your computer and watch TV instead where you will find nothing remotely challenging.

Race is still a social construct

Sure it is, which is why whites are more prone to skin cancer than blacks or why blacks have denser bones than whites or why blacks are more genetically varied than whites or why blacks are less intelligent than whites, etc, etc, etc... I'm afraid to inform you that your church has mislead you, race is no more a social construct than gravity and the sun does not go around the Earth.

The problem is that reality will never go away, and those things which make you run in fear from it remain, just like the strange behaviors of certain planets caused Copernicus to eventually call into question the Church's cosmic orthodoxy, forcing different races to live together WILL NOT result in an end to race as races themselves are evidence of the evolutionary process of divergence and speciation.

So, your contention is that white people are superior? Not just in charge, to be clear, but superior?
Because you've hinted at that, but never quite come out and said it....

That would be too shocking wouldn't it? They are more evolved, if one looks at the fossil record and can clearly discern the direction evolution has taken over millions of years, which you may have trouble doing. Is a man superior to a monkey? Can you even answer that question or will you simply utter the usual spineless liberal reply that everything is relative and evolution has no direction, ergo if survival suddenly demands that those who can swing from the trees and peal and eat bananas one handed are the fittest then hell, it's better to be a monkey!

Since I was saved by modern medicine several times over, it takes modern medicine, much time in filtered air, and occasionally breathing machines on occasion for me to be alive-at all times...as one person pointed out, I am a low-level cyborg.
I'm completely unnatural.

Sure, but less generously your actually genetically unfit. It's no coincidence that those who tend to make friends with blacks and be the most vociferous supporters of black rights are women and homosexuals or the physically unfit or those who have something to hide, as their continued survival and/or power (as is the case with women) depends upon an unnatural state of affairs in which they are held in a protective environment created by the white male.

Inevitably weakness is bred into the population until a critical point is reached whereby the existence of the alpha group is threatened and they are forced to take action to redress the imbalance.

Man people like you depress and disappoint me so freaking bad I ....just ...can't...man...

Your dependency on your emotions is a weakness, but one which seems typical of most Westerners.

 

[wellwisher]

The problem has to due with the dual standard created by liberals. There is black history month, gay day and women's month or whatever. If we wanted to add white male week, only that week will be called racists, sexist, homophobic, etc, even if they model that week on all the others. One is not dealing with honest or rational consistency. There is liberal deception in all this.

The white straight Christian male has to walk like a lone wolf. If he tries to associate, have pride or even helponly those who are similar to even partd of this self, he is a racists, sexists, homophobia, anti-semetic. If you contain any of the favorite groups, that gets a different standard that includes name calling. The name calling is only a hate crime if you are white, male, straight and Christian. The other way around has a different standard.

There needs to one standard for all. The liberal dual standard creates the impression, without all this cheating, these other groups could not create an illusion of equality. I don't believe that liberal racist conclusion. Only the Dems think that way. Repulicans would prefer all have the same rules since they believe all are equal.

The pitch is always the opposite, but democrats use the dual standard so you need to think in terms of a spin deception. For example, say we were playing golf. If a group are all about the same nobody will get a handicap. But if I think those two people are not very good, I will use a dual standard by taking strokes off their score. I might also require those I think are better carry their own clubs and only the weak can use the carts. If we were all equal we all have the same rules.

 

[spidergoat]

Sure it is, which is why whites are more prone to skin cancer than blacks or why blacks have denser bones than whites or why blacks are more genetically varied than whites or why blacks are less intelligent than whites, etc, etc, etc... I'm afraid to inform you that your church has mislead you, race is no more a social construct than gravity and the sun does not go around the Earth.

What's a white? What's a black? These are extremes on a spectrum of traits. The reason one person might identify as black and another white, both having the same skin tone, has everything to do with culture not biology.

 

[iceaura]

forcing different races to live together WILL NOT result in an end to race as races themselves are evidence of the evolutionary process of divergence and speciation.

Forcing different races to live together will exactly and definitely result in an end to the evolutionary processes that depend on separation. Divergence will be prevented, and progress toward speciation reversed, as formerly separate gene pools merge.

It's no coincidence that those who tend to make friends with blacks and be the most vociferous supporters of black rights are women and homosexuals or the physically unfit or those who have something to hide, as their continued survival and/or power (as is the case with women) depends upon an unnatural state of affairs in which they are held in a protective environment created by the white male.

Except for the blacks themselves, you mean.

They can make friends with blacks without revealing their flawed state and weak character, one would presume. But how about if they make friends with whites? Do they then reveal the same character flaws, on their part? And who is creating the protective environment for them?

But the most interesting aspect of that post was the description of the protected state - the one created by white males - as unnatural. That's the first description of a male dominated culture featuring nuclear "family values" as unnatural that I have ever seen from one of these vicious little bigots.

 

[EmptySky]

Is that the best you've got?

No, we aren't.

Nor are we "clear" that there's any salient distinction between the "economic" and "moral" aspects of abolitionism.

They were your words, let's review them as they were like music to my ears:

Rather, challenges to slavery were only successful once an industrialized economy that could out-compete plantation slavery became available.

The truth is always beautiful... isn't it? Doesn't it feel good to utter it, to be free of that burden of liberal guilt?

As for the question of the distinction between the economic and the moral, they've never been separate as a cursory view of history will tell you. The Church was always a business, just like liberal capitalism, and its morals/laws/doctrines were only a way of ensuring its continued customer base and profit margins and therefore survival.

The was no original sin, just as there is no racism or sexism or homophobia.

 

[EmptySky]

What's a white? What's a black? These are extremes on a spectrum of traits. The reason one person might identify as black and another white, both having the same skin tone, has everything to do with culture not biology.

What is the difference between a gas giant and a star, or a planet and a moon?

All things exist within a scale of gradations, there is nothing absolute.

Hence, there is no such final thing as the human race, only a definition at a particular point in time which reflects the needs and goals of the Alpha group and the changing state of nature.

 

[YoYoPapaya]

Oh my goodness, I am trying to stop my fingers from writing this but they will not stop! Must be my inferior breeding! Empty you have a clear case of penis envy. Did some mandingo steal your blonde and blue-eyed wifey, the solution is a penis enhancer not race hating!

This post should be laminated and put in a nice frame

 

[spidergoat]

What is the difference between a gas giant and a star, or a planet and a moon?

All things exist within a scale of gradations, there is nothing absolute.

Hence, there is no such final thing as the human race, only a definition at a particular point in time which reflects the needs and goals of the Alpha group and the changing state of nature.

Perhaps you mean between a planet and a large asteroid? Nothing except our definition (stars can be distinguished by their fusion reactions). The human race is the entirety of our gene pool.

 

[EmptySky]

Perhaps you mean between a planet and a large asteroid? Nothing except our definition (stars can be distinguished by their fusion reactions).

Brown dwarf stars cannot sustain fusion reactions and sit somewhere between gas giants and main sequence stars, so no, I did not mean a large asteroid, LOL.

Perhaps you should do a bit more science reading and lay off the self-righteous, liberal grandstanding.

 

[quinnsong]

.=EmptySky;2737353]
As for the question of the distinction between the economic and the moral, they've never been separate as a cursory view of history will tell you. The Church was always a business, just like liberal capitalism, and its morals/laws/doctrines were only a way of ensuring its continued customer base and profit margins and therefore survival

Oh how I wish I could disagree with you but I cannot.

The was no original sin,

I BELIEVE THIS TOO, OMG

just as there is no racism or sexism or homophobia

Then you said this and I realized you are communicating with us from another planet. Greetings and Salutations!

 

[spidergoat]

Brown dwarf stars cannot sustain fusion reactions and sit somewhere between gas giants and main sequence stars, so no, I did not mean a large asteroid, LOL.

Perhaps you should do a bit more science reading and lay off the self-righteous, liberal grandstanding.

Perhaps you should lay off the labels and do some real thought.

 

[YoYoPapaya]

lol I thought he was joking. Are you saying this Empty guy is actually being serious?

 

[EmptySky]

Forcing different races to live together will exactly and definitely result in an end to the evolutionary processes that depend on separation. Divergence will be prevented, and progress toward speciation reversed, as formerly separate gene pools merge.

Of course, evolution itself will come to an end as the process depends upon internal change.

You have also conveniently overlooked the fact that in the West whites dominate, and it is only because blacks are in a minority that they can be successfully bred into the working class white population without adversely affecting the upper echelons that multiracial societies have been given the green light. It is this savage attack on the white working class that is opposed here.

The other alternative was, of course, extermination - as was done to the Native Americans - but due to the large number of blacks, the important role they played in jump starting America and the internationally visible nature of American civilization at the late stage slavery ended that would've been a disaster for its newly burgeoning religion of liberal secular capitalism.

Except for the blacks themselves, you mean.

They can make friends with blacks without revealing their flawed state and weak character, one would presume. But how about if they make friends with whites? Do they then reveal the same character flaws, on their part? And who is creating the protective environment for them?

They make friends with whites as one comes seeking protection.

The hierarchy of nature is only revealed when races are in juxtaposition with each other, not when they are simply among their own, although this does provide the scientific mind with a unique opportunity to study them in their natural habitat.

But the most interesting aspect of that post was the description of the protected state - the one created by white males - as unnatural. That's the first description of a male dominated culture featuring nuclear "family values" as unnatural that I have ever seen from one of these vicious little bigots.

You see, your post-modern, secular faith cannot protect you from nature, and it is as the American Indians have prophesied for centuries, that nature will strike back and redress the imbalance, though not in exactly the same way their rather naive shamans would have predicted.

 

[quinnsong]

Empty please tell me you have not donated your sperm to any sperm banks! OTOH if you are an alien then the evolutionary process will not die out!

 

[spidergoat]

Of course, evolution itself will come to an end as the process depends upon internal change. ...

Nonsense. The evolutionary strength of a species is it's diversity. So when conditions change, or diseases strike, it becomes that much more likely that someone, or more people will have a variation that proves up to the challenge. Your scientific ignorance is only matched by your irrational prejudice.

 

[EmptySky]

Nonsense. The evolutionary strength of a species is it's diversity. So when conditions change, or diseases strike, it becomes that much more likely that someone, or more people will have a variation that proves up to the challenge. Your scientific ignorance is only matched by your irrational prejudice.

Ha!

Coming from someone who thought that a brown dwarf was an asteroid this is choice indeed and can only be a pathetic attempt to save face.

The whole point of sentient life - and I don't include you here - is that it doesn't react passively to threats in the environment like a brainless bacteria, but uses its intelligence to overcome those threats. Genetic diversity has little to do with it, as otherwise the dinosaurs - who were hugely diverse genetically - would have survived the asteroid strike that wiped them out. Us petty little white people, with our low genetic diversity but sparklingly high IQ's, could simply launch a few nuclear missiles to deal with such a threat, or some such other method with the same outcome, PRECISELY BECAUSE OF OUR LACK OF GENETIC DIVERSITY.

If you wish to remain as a dumb but genetically diverse bovine then don't let me stop you.

 

[YoYoPapaya]

Sounds like you like inbreeding a lot.

 

[quinnsong]

HAL is screwing his progeny! OHHH the humanity eeerrr or maybe something like it!

 

[spidergoat]

Ha!

Coming from someone who thought that a brown dwarf was an asteroid this is choice indeed and can only be a pathetic attempt to save face.

The whole point of sentient life - and I don't include you here - is that it doesn't react passively to threats in the environment like a brainless bacteria, but uses its intelligence to overcome those threats. Genetic diversity has little to do with it, as otherwise the dinosaurs - who were hugely diverse genetically - would have survived the asteroid strike that wiped them out. Us petty little white people, with our low genetic diversity but sparklingly high IQ's, could simply launch a few nuclear missiles to deal with such a threat, or some such other method with the same outcome, PRECISELY BECAUSE OF OUR LACK OF GENETIC DIVERSITY.

If you wish to remain as a dumb but genetically diverse bovine then don't let me stop you.

I didn't actually think that a brown dwarf star was an asteroid, I was just trying to improve on your awkward analogy.

Yes, our intelligence is also a source of strength, but not the only kind. I fail to see why you would claim credit on behalf of white people for NASA or the military, since these institutions are legally obligated not to discriminate based on race.

Do you personally know how to make a nuclear missile? If not then you are as impotent in the face of an asteroid strike as any primitive tribe in the jungle. And at least they know how to survive in the wilderness without technology.