Enmos
Valued Senior Member
hmm...flying frogs huh?
so you're saying that you don't trust what would be god, to present evidence to you that would be beyond doubt. or are you saying you don't trust your own perception or judgement?
see, it's nonsensical to me to consider that what would be god could not handle the task of presenting himself to you convincingly and successfully.
that's inherent in what i would consider the definition of god. if god is not capable of that, then god's not much of a god. does that make sense?
Lets stick to the frogs.
Would you believe that you actually saw a frog fly ?
What if your friend disagreed with you ?
What if there were another 20 people there and none of them saw it ?
What if you intensively searched the pond for flying frogs and found none ?
What if your friend agreed ?
What if there were another 20 people there that all saw it ?
What if you intensively searched the pond for flying frogs and found one ?
See my point ?
Last edited: