i'm just saying that the bible quite obviously and logically does not span, or was intended to span, the entire history of the human race.
The Holy Babble obviously does spam & was intended to spam the entire history of the human race.
i'm just saying that the bible quite obviously and logically does not span, or was intended to span, the entire history of the human race.
i'm not lying, calm down.
listen, the bible ends describing the end of an age, and the beginning of another. and it stands to reason that the beginning of the book is describing the same thing. if you see the stages of human evolution in terms of development, then a generation would be that stage.
in genesis, the bible says "replenish the earth". REplenish.
there is absolutely no logic or common sense or scripture to support the assumption that the bible encompasses the entire developmental history of mankind.
jesus will return prior to the end of this age, or generation of human development and he will reign in the next.
god is not a concept.
Unless anyone can produce a god, or a unicorn, or a leprechaun, they will all remain concepts of the imagination, Lori.
in genesis, the bible says "replenish the earth". REplenish
so you're saying that you don't trust what would be god, to present evidence to you that would be beyond doubt. or are you saying you don't trust your own perception or judgement?
see, it's nonsensical to me to consider that what would be god could not handle the task of presenting himself to you convincingly and successfully.
that's inherent in what i would consider the definition of god. if god is not capable of that, then god's not much of a god. does that make sense?
i see it as pretty common sense Q...an issue of respect.
How the heck can you claim to know that when you haven't read it completely???
Which, in context, means to repopulate given that the all-loving man upstairs had just drowned every living thing on the planet bar 8 people, several million animals and a vast array of bacteria with morally questionable intentions. To think of all the bacteria Noah's body must have played host to. Sheesh.
Nowhere in that is there an indication of evolution, (regardless to theist definitions).
Respect is a human concept. Is it gods concept as well? How do you know? Where in the bible does it talk about respect in this context?
i don't know. ask someone who memorizes scripture. all i know about is the way god treats me and how's he's interacted with me. i'm sure it's substantiated in the bible somewhere. where's adstar when you need him?
it's common sense.
I don't think that God respects humans a whole lot.. not their needs and not their lives.
god is making us (developing us) via evolution. they're not mutually exclusive. i mean, stands to reason god's not using magic to do it right?
Yes they are mutually exclusive. You imply that God is a naturalistic cause, but it's the opposite. Only when naturalistic explanations fail is there room for some odd thing to occur.
How do we determine objectively what is 'odd'? I find all explanations odd.Yes they are mutually exclusive. You imply that God is a naturalistic cause, but it's the opposite. Only when naturalistic explanations fail is there room for some odd thing to occur.
but don't you think that there were some significant changes made within the human race because of a near extinction, and the environmental consequences of a world wide deluge?
Sorry, don't understand the question. Significant changes?
Isn't evolution a response to environment? If significant changes took place within the environment like a flood that wipes out all but 1 family and takes its toll on nature, don't you think that would equate to an evolutionary change?
No, it doesn't equate to evolutionary change.Originally Posted by Lori_7
Isn't evolution a response to environment? If significant changes took place within the environment like a flood that wipes out all but 1 family and takes its toll on nature, don't you think that would equate to an evolutionary change?
Although the gene frequencies changed (probably) it wasn't because of evolution, it was because of a flood.
I would think it equates to extinction..