yes it's all done and dusted. i saw docu. about it too.........
regardin evidence. noticew how its all gone quiet since i brought in consciousness....why else is it te HARD probelm if it aint hard......it is the Biggie. the Biggie which confounds science in its especially materialistic positivist bias ....But it simply canoot be left out of the equation whatsoever. that IS a FACT!
i must make it clear, i m not trying to turn the debate all amorpus and away from solid evidence neite. i am trying to exploore an understanding of reality which includesphysical and what we see as soild reality.......the impass for the sceptics herer--i feel--is teir adherence to materialistic science. hence their emphasis for solid evidence, and thus their disregard for evidece which isn't 'solid'
however. that documentaryt about abductions...Bud Hopkins says:"Sceptics are fond of saying there's no physical evidence. [what they mean is] they haven't heard of any cause they haven't looked into it. [he shows photographs of 'scooping marks']-These turn up again and again. I may have seen a hundred of these. Why don't the critics recognize it? It's because they don't even KNOW about it. [Bud has collected photographs of abductees who claim theri experience left them with abnormal scars---A little boy of 5, his scar turned up over night. There's one case of 3 women who got te same scoop mark in te same place on the thigh. Docgors have told him that te scars resemble the scars from punch biopsies]. Sometimes [the aliens] will take 2 samples if the prson is reabducted and another sample is taken. One can infer without much difficulty, they are taking a flesh sample--our own DNA, our own physical genetic makeup"
regardin evidence. noticew how its all gone quiet since i brought in consciousness....why else is it te HARD probelm if it aint hard......it is the Biggie. the Biggie which confounds science in its especially materialistic positivist bias ....But it simply canoot be left out of the equation whatsoever. that IS a FACT!
i must make it clear, i m not trying to turn the debate all amorpus and away from solid evidence neite. i am trying to exploore an understanding of reality which includesphysical and what we see as soild reality.......the impass for the sceptics herer--i feel--is teir adherence to materialistic science. hence their emphasis for solid evidence, and thus their disregard for evidece which isn't 'solid'
however. that documentaryt about abductions...Bud Hopkins says:"Sceptics are fond of saying there's no physical evidence. [what they mean is] they haven't heard of any cause they haven't looked into it. [he shows photographs of 'scooping marks']-These turn up again and again. I may have seen a hundred of these. Why don't the critics recognize it? It's because they don't even KNOW about it. [Bud has collected photographs of abductees who claim theri experience left them with abnormal scars---A little boy of 5, his scar turned up over night. There's one case of 3 women who got te same scoop mark in te same place on the thigh. Docgors have told him that te scars resemble the scars from punch biopsies]. Sometimes [the aliens] will take 2 samples if the prson is reabducted and another sample is taken. One can infer without much difficulty, they are taking a flesh sample--our own DNA, our own physical genetic makeup"