Write4U said:
↑
Sophia is a cool AI robot. The trick is to cram as much data into small spaces.
For its size the human brain is incredibly efficient as a data processor.
It is a terrible data processor. It is a remarkably efficient inference engine.
It depends on what you mean by "data" and "processing" and "inference engine", no?
Which is pretty much the opposite of computers, at least until about 20 years ago
Yes, when we (our brains) started developing AI, self-referential (inferential) computers. That was 20 years ago!
This is the definition I use to base my value of
"data" on;
Data processing
Data processing is, generally, "the
collection and manipulation of items of data to produce meaningful information."
[1] In this sense it can be considered a subset of information processing, "the change (processing) of information in any manner detectable by an observer."
The term Data Processing (DP) has also been used to refer to a department within an organization responsible for the operation of data processing applications.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_processing
In humans this data organizing center is made up from microtubules, the MTOC (microtubule organizing center). See post # 1510
http://mtoc-explorer.org/
The human brain is not a purely electronic processor, it is an electro-chemical processor, which means it can process chemical data as well as electronic data, which IMO, allows for emotional experiences, a chemical response mechanism, such as production of pheromones or endorphins,
to data, which produces a meaningful experience, an ability which AI does not posess, yet.
Smell you later! Chemosignals communicate human emotions
Date: November 5, 2012
Source:
Association for Psychological Science
Summary:
Many animal species transmit information via chemical signals, but the extent to which these chemosignals play a role in human communication is unclear. Researchers have investigated whether we humans might actually be able to communicate our emotional states to each other through chemical signals.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121105140407.htm
p.s. did you notice that Sophie now uses a
cloud which connects her with other AI and can use their collective stored information to reference against her own? All she needs to learn is how to ask the question, no problem there!
IMO, the implications of that are astounding. Now AI are no longer restricted by "memory space". In a shared "cloud" they have unlimited storage capacity and potential access to all internet referential "data".
Of course, humans also have the ability to access the Internet "cloud" . We just cannot do that as fast as electronic computers.
In fact, even using paralell circuits, it takes a human
+20 years to store sufficient data to allow its own brain to be able to draw inferences from it's stored memories against received sensory data.
And even then it is a "best guess" (inference) by the brain. Anil Seth.
Using the cloud, an AI could potentially learn this much in a day at the much greater processing speed than human brain, but until we can program "emotion" (reward incentive?) into AI they can only express programmed "pseudo-emotional" responses to received sensory data. Sophie is actually pretty good at that.