How much do you stake on your opponent being wrong?

Lori_7 said:
Knowing God makes you superior.
Click to expand...
no it doesn't, that's hog wash. where the hell did you get that lame idea?
Click to expand...

Why a lame idea?
You claim to know God. This means that you have overcome all hurdles and obstacles of existence that I haven't.
I struggle with the meaning of selfhood - you have mastered it.
I struggle with the notion of what "truth" is and how to know it - you have mastered it.
Apparently, you are superior to me.


and greenberg, he's GOD. he created you. how can you NOT want to know?
Click to expand...

I don't know if God created me.
 
Lori_7 said:
for you greenberg...

Escape With Me

I’ll always tell you the truth.
Does that mean anything to you?
Forsaken the lies...
Forsaken goodbyes...
Are you strong enough to stay?

Overcome your desire to run.
Why do you want to be alone?
Alone in the dark...
Alone and in hell...
Are you strong enough to leave?
Click to expand...

You make me want to die.
 
Lori_7 said:
you know greenberg, i got to thinking and, this quote right here is the answer to your question. is this why you got so mad at me when i called you out on it? i said you don't want to know god and you said i don't want to know god.
Click to expand...

Citation please.
I said that you don't want to know God?
Or I said that I don't want to know God?


see...we agree after all.
Click to expand...

What?
 
Can we re-word the thread to "How much do you stake on your opponent being a 'daytripper'( insert own adjective here)
 
greenberg said:
Citation please.
I said that you don't want to know God?
Or I said that I don't want to know God?




What?
Click to expand...

sorry, "I don't want to know god" should have been in quotes, but it's paraphrased so...

i said that you don't want to know god, and then you said that you don't want to know god, so we agree. that's better...

i'm glad we agree. that way, neither one is superior...lol. ;)
 
Lori_7 said:
sorry, "I don't want to know god" should have been in quotes, but it's paraphrased so...

i said that you don't want to know god, and then you said that you don't want to know god, so we agree. that's better...

i'm glad we agree. that way, neither one is superior...lol. ;)
Click to expand...

I sad that I don't want to know God? Where did I say that? Quote me.
 
Read the whole sentence, along with the question mark and the next sentence. There is no Freudian slip.
 
You have a point. This keyboard is a bit sticky, so I have to hit the keys hard enough for the letters to show.
 
Cris said:
1. On the issue of the existence of souls/spirits - I have seen entirely convincing arguments that such things are entirely fictional. So my estimate of a religionist being right here is 0%.
Click to expand...

There is evidence of souls/spirits/ghosts. Look it up on google, there's tons of photos.
 
greenberg said:
You are suggesting something that is impossible to do.

I don't know what the consequences of knowing God are, so I cannot know in advance whether I am willing to take them on or not.
Click to expand...

there. there's your quote. and you've said before that you wouldn't want to know a god who would send people to "eternal hellfire", and it seems to me if you did want to know him you would want to talk about him with me but you keep making excuses, i mean coming up with reasons, not to, like superiority.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top