Happy with moderation here?

The current level of moderation of the Religion forum is:

  • Too strict

    Votes: 7 10.1%
  • Not strict enough

    Votes: 17 24.6%
  • About right

    Votes: 45 65.2%

  • Total voters
    69
Status
Not open for further replies.
Leo,

What's with slapping the lock on everyone's posts?

Everyone? Be honest – it is only a very few and then just the abusers. Perhaps YOU should check the rules again.

Who made you scout leader?

It was a democratic vote by other members. James was considered very fair an unbiased, and still upholds that high standard.

Are you paying for bandwidth out of your own pocket?

Porfiry is the owner and yes he pays for the site himself. All moderators have the full confidence of Porfiry otherwise they get fired.

Maybe if you changed the address, nobody could find the forum and you wouldn't have to post anything.

If you are unhappy with the site why do continue to come here?

This is turning out to be one of the most Neanderthal Pages I have ever Posted with one of the worst slopeheaded Moderators... no offense.

How can you make a blatantly offensive remark and then try to claim “no offense” – that seems to an example of religionist illogic again?
 
ConsequentAtheist: I think you're doing a fine job.
*************
M*W: James R, This isn't a compliment. Consider the source.
 
What's with slapping the lock on everyone's posts?

Everyone's posts aren't locked.

Who made you scout leader?

The site owner.

Are you paying for bandwidth out of your own pocket?

Yes.

Maybe if you changed the address, nobody could find the forum and you wouldn't have to post anything.

If you don't like it, you can vote with your feet, Leo.

This is turning out to be one of the most Neanderthal Pages I have ever Posted with one of the worst slopeheaded Moderators... no offense.

Oh, none taken, Leo. I'm used to being insulted like that.

Have a nice day.
 
I cant see a problem with the moderation here, offensive posts are deleted which is probably most important in a forum where things can get heated, he actually takes an interest in whats posted aswell and seems more active than other mods, i'd say he's doing a damn fine job.
 
I personally like you, as our moderator for this forum, but I do think, your somtimes not strict enough, considering the insults you receive.
Goofyfish would ban them for less, but your not goofy, your much nicer.
 
mis-t-highs said:
I personally like you, as our moderator for this forum, but I do think, your somtimes not strict enough, considering the insults you receive.
Goofyfish would ban them for less, but your not goofy, your much nicer.

Moderation has achieved ~92% satisfaction. IMO, thats a fantastic number.
 
will someone please draw their attention to the "christians are hypocrites" thread?
i am not a christian, but alot of horrendous things are being said, on both sides of the discussion.
 
Honestly, I think lockdown is for animals and I find it sad that there is so much name-calling and useless bs on these threads.

It must obviously hard to moderate the threads, because sometimes the most vitriolic offenders are friends just screwing around with each other, and that seems innocent enough.

My opinion - don't blame the moderator, blame the participants. (I see a pattern in my thinking here)
 
James R said:
Since Cris has stopped moderating this forum, leaving me as the sole moderator, I thought now might be a good time to poll users to find out what you think of the current level of moderation here, and the way it is done. So, please any post comments and/or suggestions here.

I am not promising that I will implement all suggestions, or change the way I moderate this forum, but I do promise to seriously consider all comments which are made.

Some things to think about:

* Is the current level of moderation too lax/too strict?
* Are there any kinds of threads which you think are not appropriate on the Religion forum?
* Where do you think the line should be drawn between religion and politics, and how can we tell if a thread falls on one or other side of the line?
* Should posts which are critical of a particular religion or its believers be allowed here? What about flames (e.g. "All Christians are just deluded!")? How do we draw the line between legitimate criticism and flaming?
* What other issues are important in moderating this forum?

Dear James....i voted 'about right', but that is an understatement. if you were to ask me onthe scale of 1-10 how i rate your moderation, and most of the moderation at this site i would have to say 11....YES THAT good

i speak from experience. i have been thrown off many forums for just speaking the truth. i wont name names, but there have been usually moderators that are so full of themselves they feel they have to jump in at ANY form of what thy believe is
disorder, but what that DOEs is stifle freedom. ANd it ctreates a climate of fear. people start wnating not to experiment, soeak their minds, and it all goes flat. IF the owner of the site is also of the same mind then it is-in my experience-a DEAD site

I have raved about here to several other forums i am with, so as to encourage the same form of non-intervention.
what this place proves is the value of anarchy--meaning in its original term 'no leaders' and how communities self-regulate temselves without unneccessary heavy policing

shit. haivng said this, i ope i haven't tempted fate and it goes downhill...hehe. but i REALLY am VERY impressed so far.
 
omg !!!


that guy called skinwalker is the worst racist moderator ever !!!


why do you james let such a devil control these forums ???

he is full of hate to islam and he deletes everything he dos'nt like whatever its good or not

he just judges the threads from his point of view as if he is the reference !!

that guy is very bad and i swear he is a hater and not a neutral man



you should take action because you are responsible of these forums !!!
 
Ful of hate Racist Moderator Skinwalker

this guy called Skinwalker is full of hate and racist and he is like devils he hates islam and muslims very hard he should not be a moderator here because of his racist

a moderator must be an adult with full self control and very intelligent and neutral ,


i can not believe that he is tracking everything i type and either delete it or modify it from his point of view !!

for example in the topic of why blacks are more attracted to islam

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=70689 on this link

i just answered someone who said that women are less equal in islam and corrected his wrong understanding

and anotherone wondering why muslims kill other muslims

i just said that islam is the rule and if a follower doesn't follow the right rules this does not mean that the rule itself is wrong

if your father says : don't drink wine because its harmful and then you drank the wine

dos this mean that your father is wrong .. or you are wrong because you diodnt follow the rules >???

i said that islam does not allow killing a chicken without the right to do ..

then i find that racist and hater coms delting my post and he didnt delete the other post saying women less equal

he deleted my posts saying racist posts deleted !!!

oh my god !!!

i can not believe this hater is amoderator here !!

i remember also that he was the one closed my topic after more than a year open and over than 15000 readings and answeres he closed my topic while Cris never did it although i argued with him before . !!!

this topic is here :

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=44145
 
Considering the ridiculous fuss over a cartoon depicting your prophet, your complaints are rather pointless.
 
It looked like a good thread.
Shame aout the title, which was stupid
but I can't see why it was closed.
Mods. Skinwalker. Have another look.
You might consider reopening it.
 
SkinWalker thinks christianity is PERFECT.....what an idiot.

just dont listen to him, ignore him and he'll crawl back inside his hole and die.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top