MZ3Boy84
Which is why I am questioning it. Her claim to not be religious is bunk when she keeps referencing the biblical texts.
I disagree. You can believe in god and not follow any one religion, but if your a christian you believe in the same god as other christians. That is what religion is for.
This is a different issue. I am not questioning her tactics.
No, she claimed not to be religious, then she uses the bible as her source as to what and why things are going to happen. Bad things apparently.
So I am questioning it.
Many people feel that they will be treated or viewed differently if they don't claim to be religious or non-religious depending on the situation.
Basically what has to be understood here is that what she is actually claiming is the biblical god is real. Not some god, but the biblical god, that is who is connecting to her. Everytime she references the bible to support her position, that is what she is claiming because she is also claiming an interaction with said god.
Her problem is that if she truly is not religious, then what god or who's god is it ? or, is it a god at all ?
She has not offered an answer for that.
jpappl,
the bible is not the basis for what i know. i know what i do because of the experiences i've had and messages i've been given. there was a point where god told me to open the bible and read the book of revelations. when i got to the story of the woman and the dragon, i had a very intense spiritual interaction. after that, all of this prophecy revelation in the form of messages flooded my mind like a whirlwind. i would have never read the bible if i hadn't been instructed to do so that night. i was actually right in the middle of a transcendental writing and was experiencing manifestations and physical symptoms of that which all of my attention had been focused on. it happens this way, and you're not paying attention to what i'm saying about the dynamic. what i experience "just happens" to be substantiated by scripture.
god says "put the letter down and go get your bible and read the book of revelations".
then god proceeds to interpret a bunch of prophecy in it to me.
the experiences i have are enacting that revelation.
god could have very well not done that. god could have directed me towards another religious text, or no text at all. god's used many other things to communicate with me including his voice in my head, interactions with other people, movies, music, and literature.
this isn't me saying, "well i'm a christian, so all i'm willing to look at and consider and accept is what it says in the bible."
i've said it before...i have no preconceived notions, and no agenda in regards to the bible or in regards to religion. all i've ever asked for is the truth. so if god chooses to reference the bible, and if the truth that he gives me through experience is substantiated by it, then that's up to god, not me. AND things that god has told me, and the way i've gone about experiencing these things are not readily accepted by religious people at all. these interpretations are extremely unconventional. what god has explained to me about religion most religious people would not want to hear. god doesn't like religion.