U people have no shame that Astronots never saw up on the moon to look at the stars.
Did The Moon Landing Occur - Yes or No?
- Thread starter darksidZz
- Start date
U people have no shame that Astronots never saw up on the moon to look at the stars.
check this out: http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimedia/gallery/Moon_Landings.jpg
all the moon landing spotz
all the moon landing spotz
have u no shame?!!!
To say astronauts never been on the moon! Go look at ISS photos, International Svace Station...well guess what there are no visible stars there too.
golfing: http://anon.nasa-global.edgesuite.net/anon.nasa-global/ccvideos/iss/ex14_golf.ram
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/multimed...n_Landings.jpg
heh:bugeye: ? did apollo 11 originally inteded to land near surveyor 5
heh:bugeye: ? did apollo 11 originally inteded to land near surveyor 5
Apparently the data from Surveyor5 ... showed some interest.
Mare Tranquillitatis was landing.
Instrument: Alpha-Scattering Surface Analyzer
data: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19690027073_1969027073.pdf
results:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveyor_5
It's yust funny that it was only 25 km away from the lander of apollo 11(note that surveyor 5 is not the same like the visited surveyor 3).
So there you go travelling 300 000 km and when your there you stop 25 km of something interesting. (I realise that they couldn't walk the distance but it should not have been impossible to photograph it or land closer to it
It's yust funny that it was only 25 km away from the lander of apollo 11(note that surveyor 5 is not the same like the visited surveyor 3).
So there you go travelling 300 000 km and when your there you stop 25 km of something interesting. (I realise that they couldn't walk the distance but it should not have been impossible to photograph it or land closer to it
I am sure they had a reason. There must have been something that Surveyor 5 imagery showed.
I gues the terrain was interesting and wel known it's always a plus if you know that the landing side are soft plaines (pictures of probe) with little bolders, but it's a pitty they missed the lander altough I gues it's acceptable that the first mission mist by a couple of km aftherall they where landing on the moon the first time someone tried to reach India from the west he ended up in the bahamas so all considering they did very wel. But it is a pitty that visting the probe was never in the original flight plan .
Jeremyhfht
Registered Senior Member
don't forget that surveyor 5 showed land in which they could land on.
That's one of the major reasons that spot was chosen. They knew the terrain best to plot a landing, and it was the easiest to land on.
That's one of the major reasons that spot was chosen. They knew the terrain best to plot a landing, and it was the easiest to land on.
have u no shame?!!!
Go look at ISS photos, International Svace Station...well guess what there are no visible stars there too.
golfing: http://anon.nasa-global.edgesuite.net/anon.nasa-global/ccvideos/iss/ex14_golf.ram
Hmm, when i got 1 pic analysis wrong, ALL THE MORLOCKs have started flocking in.
U dumbo, i never said stars should be visible to the camera. I said the Astronots never saw them, thats a mind blowing humor ie. if u poses a mind
.Well thanks for adding fuel to fire.
Now prove,
how does a Lander located at 30 degrees give a view this beautiful.
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/mirrors/images/images/pao/AS17/10075958.jpg
singularity...is fake
Well, now you've just gone off the rails...
Jeremyhfht
Registered Senior Member
...and over the river and through the woods...
That picture was not taken from a lander, it was taken by an astronaut during an EVA
See here, and perhaps you should read the captions before making claims, Anomalous.The accompanying NASA page said:
Hmm, seems like moon is so small that u can go around it in a rover within hours.
THE MORLOCKs ARE RUNNING FOR COVER AGAIN !
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a17/AS17-134-20387.jpg
Now is this EVA, Mr. PETE ?
Its doesnt even look 45 degrees, its should be 60 degrees.
EVA is nothing but being outside the Lander.
http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/luceneweb/caption_direct.jsp?photoId=AS17-137-20910
EVA training
http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/lucenewe...e=Go&hitsperpage=5&pageno=2&photoId=S72-44423
http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/luceneweb/caption_direct.jsp?photoId=AS17-137-20910
EVA training
http://images.jsc.nasa.gov/lucenewe...e=Go&hitsperpage=5&pageno=2&photoId=S72-44423
Last edited: