Singularity, you don't make much sense. I'll give you a last chance.
Just look at your Avatar Id, its all your Arena, Goo. Thoes words of U "We all came from goo!" are yours. Now live with your choices. Dont try to shove them through other throats.
Can you please explain to me what you mean by saying 'it's all your arena, goo.' I'm afraid that means very little to me.
The words 'we all came from goo' are most decidedly not mine. They are a quote from someone on the forum - I think it was Ice Age civilisations - who used it repeatedly in what he thought was a mockery of the theory of evolution. I adopted it highlight how foolish his catchprase was.
Therfore, I have absolutely no idea which choice you think it is I have made, or what it is you think I am trying to shove down your (or anyone elses) throat.
Look at u , this thread is not about me, what u r doing is online harassment based on members gender, go get a man of your size to tow. But i am not a 19th century girl; now stop living in that era because i dont back off to threats.
You really need to take a long deep breath and try to establish contact with reality.
Point 1: I had absolutely no idea you were female, and frankly don't give a an aardvark's anus that you are. I fail to see what relevance your gender, or mine for that matter, have to gross misinterpretation of scientific and historical observations.
Point 2: I am not harassing you. (If anything you are harassing me, but if that's your number go right ahead.) Rather, I am seriously questioning the value of your contribution to this thread.
Point 3: I have not made any threats and mildly resent your suggestion that I have.
No where had i made any claims, all i said are possibilities but the problem is your outlook, ie. non scientific.
Please don't be coy.
Point 1: You have certainly claimed there are possibilities, that simply, in the light of the facts, are most certainly not possibilities.
Point 2: While you do not explicitly claim some of these as probable, or indeed factual, you imply that they are. If that was not your intent then you need to improve your written English.
I will always do that after getting personal insults, read this entire thread, i choose only the morlocks. Janus58, James R, Orcot, Pete and many others behave unlike morlocks like u.
I cannot disceern exactly which characteristic of Wells' subterranean denizens you feel are shared by this group, but you appear to be applying it to anyone who adopts a measured, reasond, logical, scientific stance. Perhaps you clould clarify what specifically you object to in their posts.
I said "
You fail to respond to any of the substantial debunking of specific points. ”
You replied "
Thats your claim, show the evidence."
Here:
You stated in post 265 "
So can he tell us why these shadows are different though from the same mission "Apollo 11" and how come the shadow is touching the horizon in the second pic, lets see if this american has anything in its SKULL.
In post 272 I explained: "
If you examine the enlarged photograph above you can very clearly see the shadow of the LM just touches the edge of the crest of the small rise on the far side of the LM.
Refer to your second photo in post #265 and guess what? The shadow of the LM touches the edge of the crest of the small rise."
And I never heard anything back from you, as far as I can see. That's the evidence.
Dont impose your imaginations as my objectives.
I have absolutely no idea what you are prattling on about here. Perhaps you would care to explain.
And think about science instead of the forum members or get out of here if u cant do that, learn something from PETE.
Point 1: I am thinking primarily about science. I am opposed to memebers who disregard science, or the scientific method, as you appear to have been doing. I shall continue to oppose and condemn those who display a disregard for scientific method, show wooly thinking, indulge in dogma, are self righteous, discourteous without cause, etc
Point 2: I thought you said Pete was a morlock. what am I supposed to learn from him?
