Of course. But when you lack evidence and a solid logical arguement that is when disbelief comes into the qestion.samcdkey said:Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
Lack of evidence + Lack of reason(logic) = lack of belief
Of course. But when you lack evidence and a solid logical arguement that is when disbelief comes into the qestion.samcdkey said:Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
samcdkey said:Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
that works aswell.Crunchy Cat said:Absence of evidence over many millenia + increasing presence of contradictive evidence = strong evidence of absence.
Explain it then?spiritual_spy said:Reason = Logic not Reason = meaning
I exist for no apperant reason nor do any of us exist for a reason. But that dosent mean we cant give ourselves purpose. As for chance, the chance that formed us is still subject to the laws of the universe.
Yep.draqon said:And the chemical of love is hormone oxytocin. All we are biochemical machines...all our emotions...especially love...are chemical reactions.
So, your saying I should avoid this person?samcdkey said:If you follow the thread from page 20 you'll realise that discussion is an alien concept; be prepared to put on your gloves and step into the ring; otherwise just ignore the flamers.
esp Q ( for someone who's preaching atheism as an alternative he comes off sounding worse than the fundamentalists; completely intolerant and he only reads or believes whatever supports his pre-conceived notions. So ignore him if you really want to debate. Of course this is just a friendly warning and if you want to troll well in that case he's the best for playing "bait the moron and watch him bust a vein")
Regulus said:Your explaining things thru a feeling. I didn't believen God on the premise of feeling devine, I put some logic into it, and experience that seemed "out of the ordinary or otherworldly". Also your using a theory that once again explains no cause.
The reason for organisms wanting to survive? You have missed that explanation. Explaining things by using our biological nature does not disprove the possibility of such a being. It merely explains us as disillusioned monkeys that don't use reason when trying to prove they have a purpose. I based my belief in God by logic, and experiences that happend to me that seemed unatural.
And wait.... didn't you say you believed in infinite reincarnation Morbid Dragon?
spiritual_spy said:Ahhhhhhh!!!!!!!
I cant find any thing on how the laws formed. :bugeye:
you sound like you think the universe is alivedraqon said:rather dont say anything, close your lips and stare at the universe as it unravels its mysteries even more, with more questions left unanswered.