If by "here" you mean those that post on this religion sub-forum,
Negative.
And to be honest with you, the rest of your post just smacks of a whiney brat who feels put upon that their points are dismissed so easily, yet can't understand why.
I appreciate your candor but I really don't care how you perceive OR if you dismiss me. I'm completely apathetic to the colorful metaphors you chose to make use of. In fact, I do so much dismissing myself I can hardly blame you for it yourself. I just do it more objectively than most. (which is an understatement of epic proportions on this forum)
What you see as hazing or bullying is merely due to you not being able to accept the arguments against what you post.
or vise versa. (shrug)
Hazing is hazing though. On this forum it has a ritualistic quality (meaning extremely repetitive un-moderated harassments which defy forum rules.
In short - you're whining that you're not getting your own way: Wah wah wah.
I have never whined about getting my own way.
I traditionally don't harass the moderators with yours or others harasment because 1. I recognize the bias, 2. I really don't care. 3. It would be fruitless any.
If you dislike the treatment your posts get so much, why do you still bother?
:shrug:
Trial by Fire
saquist,
Your tone here and language demonstrates your own biased crusade against atheists.
That's a perception.
My function is to point out the facts and behaviors objectively even if you don't like it.
Your wide ranging blanket statements are typical of someone holding a grudge towards a whole group, in the same way you accuse atheists.
Generalities and Sterotypes are almost always true for a reason. Properly using them means not applying them to individuals or using them in a derogatory fashion.
But in defence of sciforums I have tried a number of times to debate on other religious forums, and that is if I can get registered, usually I am not admitted once I admit on the aplication that I am atheist.
That's because of the atheist reputation for being dogmatic, aggressive and what I can only describe as arrogant and foul. I would personally give you a chance...I'd give everyone a chance but you can't really blame them for flinching when they've been hit over and over and over and over. I'd suggest making friends like River-wind does and getting an endorsement from one of the members.
That's OK but when I peruse their debates I see massive vilification of the atheist position but with no chance that anyone more informed can respond appropriately,
It's the same thing here just the other side of the extremist fense.
I originally joined for the Star Wars Star Trek debate but I have a large interest of science as well. I merely disappointed at the extremism but I quickly got used to it and it's taught me an immeasurable amount about atheist, what they believe, and they're behavioral tendencies. It was also here that I cultivated an interest for logical deduction. Once I realized there was an objective method for debate in the form of rules I read and studied everything I could and committed them to memory.
But when I can post I am overwhelmed with vast numbers of vitriolic replies - the atheist reactions to theists on this forum seem quite mild in comparison.
Disappointing...isn't it.
Yet I cannot conscious-ably condone either.
At least here theists can air their perspectives and attempt a defence against the atheist. Some of the more atheist miltant attitudes I see here seem more as a result of intense frustration that there appears no way to convince theists to think more clearly, and hence the human tendency to become increasingly angry.
I have personally experienced those feelings and have let rip occasionally, even though that is extremly rare nowadays. I have come to accept that the saying "you can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink" seems so relevant to the atheist/theist debate. And here I feel qualified as I was a very active Christian some decades ago and did argue fiercely for the Christain perspective.
When I first got here I allowed emotionalism to over take me within debate but I found it led to errors and it's apart of my principles to admit to those mistakes (which I found was not an entirely bad feeling) yet it revealed flaws in my thinking, being here has served a purpose in mending those flaws and strengthening my shields and apathy against the emotion others use to justify their position. I let go of the desire for reputation and to goaded by peer pressure to which I'm now immune. It was always my agenda to seek to remove myself from the 80 percentile. The percentage of people that standby and watch while injustice happens instead of acting upon it. As a result I move more swiftly in favor of injustice rather than become a clone/slave to popularity and social pressure of the mob mentality.
It doesn't bother me to listen to common flaws of theist.
I know they are often true but I remember they aren't a necessary truth. It doesn't like wise bother me to dictate the flaws of atheist. They are not a necessary truth either.