Mikey,
I might know more about it than you think, and most of the stuff you hear about abductions is fiction, it's nonsense dropped into those peoples heads to keep them as far away from the truth as possible.
I am not sure with what justification you say "most" abductions are fiction or nonsense. It is a claim, that you should substantiate. Nonetheless, in saying so, you concede that "some" abductions are fact.
Understand this too, what you perceive as reality, is just a collection of impulses circling around in your brain, neurons firing, microscopic collisions of data transcending what your sensors picked up into a spectral readout you know as consciousness.
It's possible for any number of these factors to be altered through drugs, drink, insominia, diabetes, mental disorders or the conspiracy of someone implanting thoughts through a sonar system.
I have been aware of this for a long time. However, it is also true, a fact affirmed by John Mack(professor of psychology: Harvard) that most abductees are psychologically normal. It is also true, that group and/or mass abductions take place, who are also deemed psychologically normal. It is also true, that there are unrelated eye witness testimonies of the abduction taking place.
Now, to be honest, to suggest these abductions are illusions projected by mind control frequencies, is absurd. In fact, by doing so, the government is attracting attention to themselves.
Your reality can be altered, although reality itself isn't, you can see, hear, feel, taste touch and smell things that aren't there, as they are projected impulses to your brain.
You think you lose time, or consciousness but really it's a diversion of your conscious thought pattern taking a different pathway, how the diversion was caused is something your going to have to discover for yourself, but I wouldn't suggest there is an alien within any close proximity to it.
Some abductions are caused by delusions, or distorted pathways as you would like to put it. I do not refute that. Yet, some abductions, clearly are not.
As for Cloning humans, what purpose would they have? (they being anyone that intended to do so) The shear aspect is that any genetic sample taken from someone is "Timecoded" by the rate of the persons mitosis, cellular subdivision works at a computational rate (in fact it's a near constant). So taking DNA from a 40 yr old means that a cloned newborn is going to age at an accelerated rate, and developed a number of potential flaws due to it's code having its age manipulated. (Why do you think carbon dating is seen as so accurate with things, and why cloning a full human is so absurd?)
Yes, but what you fail to consider, is that the genetic experiments could be conducted for the purpose of identifying and rectifying those flaws.
This in turn means that you couldn't clone someone to be farmed for parts, as those parts would die quicker than if you had the part you started with. (This is where the moral high ground is, should people farm parts? The reality is no because any being created would be sentient.)
No, this is the type of logic, that says: Relativity says you cannot travel faster than the speed of light and thus you work within it's boudaries. Rather you should be working at the boundary. What it really means, Stryden, that you couldn't clone someone to be farmed for parts with current understanding of genetics. Hence, why cloning experiments take place; they are working at the boundary.
As for Germ warfare, that stuffs been kicking around since the First World War and just won't die the agonising death it so deserves. Why it still exists?, it's very simple.
It's CHEAP, thats the problem. Although I should mention it to be CHEAP and DIRTY, most definitely DIRTY. It's like kicking someone in the nuts, even when you could of handled a fair fight.
In all essense the CHEAPNESS of weapons, isn't as half as CHEAP as life is viewed by those that use them, which is something that should be dealt with. While people feel they should just kill on command, or be prepared to even to the point of their own destruction, they undermine what Life actually is about.
I do not blame scientists that help build weapons. This was the moral dilemma of the lead scientist of the Manhattan project. Who felt, responsible and guilty for having a part in building that terrible and destructive A bomb, opening a Pandora's box. However, it was only his duty too; how it was used was not his duty nor his order.
Yet, we need to learn from this. We have no reason to be a warring race any more. We have abundant, free, clean, and non-pollutant energy. We are on the verge of an economic golden age and age of space exploration and self-discovery. We can cure cancer, aids, and other such diseases. We can build a beautiful planet and a beautiful civilization. No, good-hearted and rational-minded person, would be against this.
Then why is the government doing all this research in the dark? Then why is the government spending trillions on warfare? Why are they hell bent on destroying our planet and witholding this from us? Stryden, if they have good intentions, then why do hide it from the public?
It does not take a rocket scientist to figure it out. They certainly do not have good intentions. They are designing weapons of super-destruction, not only to be used against enemies, but against us. Germ warfare that seek out victims by their race. Do you know, even AIDS, is their creation - created by secretions from human, animal and xyz biology. That is why we cannot combat it. They are creating "non-lethal" mind control weapons to be used against us. Their plans is to enslave their own race and to create an elitest socieity - like Hilter.
This is why it is in the dark, Stryden. This is why they are stooping to the lowest level to keep the secrecy. The terms of their agenda is almost identical to those of the Nazi's and Hitler. Human gullibility and foolishness has been exploited since the dawn of man, and we continue to be gullible and foolish. We entrust our rights, our freedom and security in the hands of others, not even questioning, if they are right. Are you not thus one of those, who does not raise an eye brow or a fist, to what is going on around you. Will you only react, when it is too late?
I hope i'm wrong, perhaps the government really want the best for us, but I find such optimism to be unfounded and naive. I can see what is happening before my very eyes. So can you: An unelected, multinational government, operating in the dark, free from the UN, legal and social framework, abducting it's own citizens, assassinating it's own men and women, attacking it's own people and forcibly occupying other sovereign nations for their resources, spiting everyone, including the international community. i've always thought good and bad are just relative, but THAT; that sounds like pure evil.
