btimsah said:
You contradicted yourself when you stated that Military secrets are always revealed and "not hidden well".
Except that's not what I said. That's not even a good paraphrase. What I'm saying is that
significant government conspiracies have
not been kept in the past. I cited several examples. I then stated that if there were indeed a coverup that regarded Extraterrestrials from a crashed space ship at Roswell, NM, then it would have long revealed itself in a fashion that would have left no doubt.
btimsah said:
This bizzare North Western Indian story has nothing to do with that.
Then you missed the point. A point, I might add, that wasn't all that intellectually challenging, nor was it bizzare. Indeed, it was
far less bizzare than the belief that alien spacecraft(s) have crashed in New Mexico and magically left no evidence. I hope it was simply a case of you refusing to actually digest the paragraph and not that you were unable to understand the significance of mythology and embellishment.
btimsah said:
The Roswell Case is not a myth.
It has all the markings of a myth: an actual event that was very mundane compared to the end story; snowballing embelleshments -more added to the story each year; anecdotal transmission; no physical evidence to support the embellishments; evidence to support the mundane explanation; devoted believers that accept the embellished version on faith all the while rejecting the prosaic and more probable version; etc.
btimsah said:
Likewise, the Military COULD NOT reveal that they had found an alien spacecraft due to the extreme paranoia and fear in the country at that time.
That is certainly a possibility and it makes sense. However, the military and the US Government has
not demonstrated that it is capable of sustaining a secret of that sort of significance for that length of time. Can you produce such a case? The most significant secret of the day was the Manhattan Project. You can get just about any information on the project you want today. Entire books have been written by participants and the data has been acknowledged by the government.
However, when you consider those that have "come forward" with regard to the alleged "Roswell/Alien Spaceship" conspiracy, you only get third party authors or those that claim to be minor players in the scheme of things. Even your rather long copy and paste (against forum rules, by the way) of the General's "testimony" to the so-called Disclosure Project is unconvincing. The fact that he was a general doesn't imply that he is any more or less fallible than a janitor or parking lot attendent. It is still a spurious anecdote without corroborating physical evidence and can be discarded until such time as corroborating physical evidence can be produced.
This, my friend, is the thing that separates the believer from the skeptic. I'm not willing to accept what others claim they have seen simply because they say they saw it. Believers are quick to imply that the "shear volume/quantity of witness testimony" is enough, but I maintain that the more
quantity you have, the more
physical evidence must be present. And yet witness count keeps going up, but no implants have been shown to exist; no rear fender has been recovered from the space ship; no owner's manual nicked by abductees; no photographs that aren't at extreme distance and/or blurred to extremes; no bodies produced; no epithelials recovered; no artifacts of alien manufacture at all.
But of course, they exist... the government just keeps them hidden. It's a convenient excuse. I even read a post from a believer a while back that criticized the US Government for being incompetent to the extreme, while maintaining that they are able to sustain a secret.
btimsah said:
You immediately believe EVERY claim and witness which contradicts EVERYONE ELSE in a desperate effort to support a more mundane explanation.
Why would I be desperate? for one; and for two, I only contradict those claims that are without merit. The claim that the US Government has in its possession a crashed alien spacecraft and the bodies of extraterrestrial aliens is not substantiated by the claimants and readily explained by the government in this
post-Cold War society.
A high quantity of anecdotal claims with a
zero quantity of physical evidence is suspect, but it is readily present in all human mythology.
btimsah said:
They went with the Roswell story because the military said they had just found a flying disc. It has nothing to do with the crap you wrote above.
It has everything to do with what I wrote above. Correct me if I'm wrong. The debris was discovered by rancher Mack Brazel on 6/14/47. On 6/24/47, Kenneth Arnold has his "sighting" over Oregon/Washington and the press coins the term "flying saucer" based on his description. 7/4/47 marks the relative
peak of the saucer hysteria in the United States. 7/5/47 is the day that Brazel hears of the saucer story. On 7/7/47 he tells the Roswell sheriff what he found on his ranch. Not knowing that Professor Charles Moore's
Mogul Flight #4 was launched on 6/4/47 and subsequently lost, Brazel, and later Marcel, make the assumption that since there are all these 'flying saucers' about, one of them crashed. Near a military
proving ground!
The whole myth of Roswell's UFO crash is so insignificant once the 'flying saucer craze' is relatively over, that
nothing is ever discussed in the popular media until after Spielburg's movie
Close Encounters of the Third Kind re-popularizes the idea in 1977, the same year that
Star Wars debuted, instilling the desire for outer-space adventure just about anyone who went to the theater. Stanton Friedman started talking about Roswell in 1978 and the embellishments
snowballed from there.
Most believers today are victims of popular media:
Close Encounters, the X-Files,
Unsolved Mysteries, several books that claim to have interviewed participants, etc., etc.
It's mythology. If you can't accept that, it's because you have an emic view of the UFO/Alien culture. I did, too, once. But then I obtained an education, and not just a
college one.
Guys like you accuse guys like me of being close-minded, but it's the opposite. You've read countless books on the subject of UFOs I'm sure. So have I. I've read books with titles like
Alien Agenda,
Open Skies, Closed Minds, and
Above Top Secret and of authors like Randle, Mars, Streiber, Good, and Mack.
But I've also read titles by authors like Carl Sagan, Michael Shermer, Philip Klass, Park, John Casti, and Joe Nickel to name a few. Some of these books dealt with UFOs directly, some with critical thinking and logic, some with science and science history.
I wonder how many UFO/ETI believers bother to read these authors? Some do, I'm sure.