Suppose you get assaulted and/or raped. Would you think that it was indeed you that was raped, and not just your body?
YES!
My mind would be violated too, because my self determination and dignity would have been taken away.
Suppose you get assaulted and/or raped. Would you think that it was indeed you that was raped, and not just your body?
YES!
My mind would be violated too, because my self determination and dignity would have been taken away.
Considering that we disidentify with our bodies on a daily basis (such as when pushing ourselves out of the bed in the morning, even though the body feels like more sleeping), I wonder how can you ask that question above ...
Interesting ... A common approach in counselling rape victims is along the lines of reasoning 'It wasn't you who was violated, it was just your body.'
Interesting ... A common approach in counselling rape victims is along the lines of reasoning 'It wasn't you who was violated, it was just your body.'
Suppose you get assaulted and/or raped. Would you think that it was indeed you that was raped, and not just your body?
still the bottom line is: do you let an eight year old do whatever they want to? another question is: is it in the best interest of the child to go along with this?
kids are sometimes confused and what if this is just a period of uncertainty?
what if the child gros up and say: i cant believe you allowed me to do that.
still the bottom line is: do you let an eight year old do whatever they want to? another question is: is it in the best interest of the child to go along with this?
kids are sometimes confused and what if this is just a period of uncertainty?
what if the child gros up and say: i cant believe you allowed me to do that.
That's ignoring your body. I think you might have a strange definition of identifying with one's body. According to my definition of identifying we do it all of the time in every thing we say and how we describe ourselves. It's like saying I'm not a woman my body is a woman, or I'm not athletic my body is athletic, I'm not fat my body is fat. While all those things may be true, your body is you and you are your body. So I can't even imagine what it must feel like to not be able to identify with your body.
You also don't understand rape counseling. It's widely recognized the mental scarring lasts longer than the physical harm.
even that young you know whether you want to marry a boy or a girl when you grow up. of my few gay friends one said he'd decided he liked dudes by year 1 or something.
still the bottom line is: do you let an eight year old do whatever they want to? another question is: is it in the best interest of the child to go along with this?
kids are sometimes confused and what if this is just a period of uncertainty?
what if the child gros up and say: i cant believe you allowed me to do that.
How do you know that your body is you and you are your body?
What proof do you have for that?
I don't deny that it is so for some people, but I strongly disagree, based on personal experience. I was "normal" in my attractions until roughly 14 years of age, where I abruptly started finding other boys very attractive. Most of my childhood saw me having typical crushes and thinking about getting married to girls (even my cousin once!).
Born "gay" is not my experience, and I don't accept it as a rule, but something that is merely a common occurrence in some individuals, not universal.
When my brain is inactive so is my mind. When my body moves to the left I go to the left with it, I don't just watch it. How can you prove that what is happening to my body is not happening to me?
How many people refer to themselves without referring to their body?
As far as I know, the bible says nothing about transgendered people. If we keep transgendered kids out of Catholic school, what about intersexual children who have both sets of genitals and aren't sure how they feel yet? Where's the line stop?
Au contraire, ma soeur! Christianity SHOULDN'T work that way, but thanks to Puritans and holier-than-thou types, love of legalism gives way to stretching Biblical precepts and morality into a much wider umbrella than it should be in every case.Yeah, exactly. Look, I appreciate that the Catholics have the Bible and I understand they're somewhat bound to it, it being the basis for everything they are and all, but you can't just tack stuff on because gender-bending seems a little odd. That's not how Christianity works.
Why don't they just leave the ignoramuses behind and go to another church. That's what I would do. A new school and a new church where she'll be nothing but a little girl and no one will question it.
What exactly did he tell you?My brother says the same thing. I actually thought that was bullshit until he said that to me, because I was curious about same sex stuff very early.
Do you think boys are more sensitive to socialized sexuality than girls?
You were the one to state 'your body is you and you are your body'. It is up to you to provide some proof for that, not for me to prove it isn't so.
I know some.
I've done some interesting reading on eunuchs in the Bible and in other parts of the world throughout history. Being a eunuch was not as simple as just being a castrated male. There were, if it can be believed, instances of non-castrated males being considered as eunuchs. Perhaps a more proper term would be third-sex or third gender.
There are such things, like the hijra. Biological males who dress and behave like females.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijra_(South_Asia
I think perhaps, Biblically, cross-dressing and transgenderism would fall under the category of eunuchism.
Au contraire, ma soeur! Christianity SHOULDN'T work that way, but thanks to Puritans and holier-than-thou types, love of legalism gives way to stretching Biblical precepts and morality into a much wider umbrella than it should be in every case.