To: Bowser
In
#4↑ above, I noted a husband's prerogative and wife's duty; in your response (
#5↑), you asserted, more generally,
"Yeah, men will try, but that's a male prerogative to try."
Apparently, this sentiment we both recall is among
"fringe elements REJECTED by most, and therefore not culturally acceptable"↑.
Certainly a phrase about bedfellows occurs to mind, as does a saying about enemies of enemies. But that's all superficial.
Here's a question:
We might not agree on the significance and implications of a certain behavior we both recognize, but apparently that's beside the point, because society has roundly "REJECTED" this "fringe" behavior. Tell me sir, are you and I remembering this history wrongly?
I mean, consider the example I mentioned earlier, and let's try it that way.
So a grief counselor is maybe all of five minutes out of having just counseled grief, and a man walks up to her and tells her, "You know, hey, I've been watching you, and you should smile. You just don't look very nice when you're not smiling."
Now, sure, this turns out to be really, really crass in terms of the timing, right? After all, how could he have possibly known, having been watching her, that she had her reasons for not happening to be smiling at that moment. How unfortunate, you know?
But, you know, it's a man's prerogative to try, right?
I mean, regardless of our difference of opinion about the significance of that notion, we both recognize the idea, right? Why wouldn't he give a pretty lady helpful advice? How's he supposed to meet women? Something like that? Fill in the blank?
And, you know, I would think you and I might dispute whether this behavior is acceptable or not, but guess what? It turns out this question "does not exist" because, apparently, the man's prerogative to try is a "fringe" behavior "REJECTED by most, and therefore not culturally acceptable".
To that end, you and I might look at the state of the discourse on this issue, and even attend polling when and where it can be found, and this apparently contentious issue is already settled.
Which, of course, only begs the question: You know, not very nice when she's not smiling, unfortunate timing, and all that.
So ... why would he bother in the first place?
Because his behavior is not at all uncommon.
And why would anyone
watch someone else and then say something like that?
If it's not merely because it's a man's prerogative to try, are we dealing with some sort of mental retardation, then, affecting a significant subpopulation of males and inhibiting functional socialization?
I mean, honestly, good news, everybody! The whole thing about a man's prerogative to try is apparently settled.
Here's the bad news, then: What's with all the sexual belligerence?
Or are all the women just makin' it up?
How about 2012, then? Why? No reason; it's just not that long ago and happens to be the date of
Zosia Sztykowski's↱ reflection on excuses for street harassment―normalization, compliment, harmlessness, "the One", slut shaming―and the idea that this spectre of harassment looming over women doesn't exist because society has rejected it leaves me wondering if this happened in the last few years.
And for whatever reason the same website, just last year,
revived Barry Deutsch's 2010 cartoon↱ about street harassment. But, you know, if this problem, as our neighbor asserts, doesn't exist, what, is this just some evil feminazi conspiracy?
Or is the harassment still happening? Only, you know, just not because of a man's prerogative to try?
I mean, really? You share sympathies with this guy; what the hell is anyone else supposed to make of this? Is the issue supposed to just go away because he says so, or something?
____________________
Notes:
Sztykowski, Zosia. "5 Excuses for Street Harassment We Need To Stop Making…Now". Everyday Feminism. 9 October 2015. EverydayFeminism.com. 16 November 2015. http://bit.ly/1NXcbb2
Deutsch, Barry. "Why We Should Stop Saying Street Harassment Is a Compliment". Everyday Feminism. 15 October 2014. EverydayFeminism.com. http://bit.ly/1kAEL6I