Yes, well. So would you have been if you had seen something which normally defies normal explanations.
:shrug:
Well Documented UFO Case
- Thread starter EndLightEnd
- Start date
Yes, well. So would you have been if you had seen something which normally defies normal explanations.
:shrug:
My second sighting had no other wittnesses mind you.
And yet you spend countless hours on the internet trying to do just that.
Who says disguise was their main objective? Indeed, if they have been visiting Earth for a while, we may assume they had made contact a long time ago in some form or another.
I would like you to keep in mind that ''UFO-like'' objects have been depicted in art for many many years. Centuries in fact.
As for frame of reference, you are using it in a scientific way. I compare the sighting's I have had (two of them) with my knowledge on our capabilities - I have explained this more than once, so your use of this against me makes no sense.
Actually, originally, I came here for the physics. Not UFO discussions. That came later when I felt confident enough and militant enough to discuss these things. Now that I have actually studied the UFO culture for many years now, I feel educated enough to discuss these things.
Which is hilarious.
The place you live must be a mecca for alien spacecraft.
Not ONCE, but TWICE have you spotted ET on a pass through of your neighborhood.
But you have been active in this UFO "culture" for many many years, correct?
about where i live is where aircraft bank to get into the flight path for landing. it is approximately a mile or two away. smaller specks resolve into single engines when overhead, larger into private jets, even larger into commercial.
experience by way of repetition can then resolve specks into a reasonably accurate identification
i would also wager that most could do the same
it is a consequence of living in an era of flight
barton in lebanon...
martin in shiloh
who really gives a rats ass as to how big it was?
That's interesting, but aside from some eyewitnesses of something odd and a very bad Poloroid of some lights in the sky, what else is there? I don't discount they saw something, there's no reason to think they'd make it up. But unlike that article, I'm not going to reason that since no one can explain it...must be aliens.
So it's that's religious or pseudoskepticism to you, so be it. I just look for more details than you do to be convinced.
I don't understand what you mean, by active?
Mecca due to how many sightings by me? Two?
And how many sightings are made in a year in the UK alone, do you know the statistics, I do....
Reading about it, writing about it, watching shows about it, discussing it online
I work at an airport at night. I've seen large lights come in, looking like a large craft farther away and banking quicker than expected, only to be a single engine craft. Again, it's all perspective, and in the dark with nothing else to judge size or distance, measurements can be wildly wrong.
I am not pissed off. I have already explained an official investigation went into my observation, and other's observations.
I feel quite sure about my sighting. It must piss you off however you can have a discussion with someone so adament that they have even been through the official channels.
In that case, you might say that then. Yes.
You mean how many things in the sky that the 60 million people living in the UK see that they can't identify?
Hmmm?
Hard to say, but a couple of hundred a year I'd suspect.
i am trying to tell you that the the accounts involve more than just your "lights"
how hard is that to comprehend?.
good for you
i on the other hand will not rule out that possibility