The Vatican are likening the oppression and treatment of the Palestinians as being akin to concentration camps.
Okay. But this is not genocide. Needless to say, I think Israel should back off of the West Bank. But will this result in the cessation of hostilities? Of course not. So I reiterate: what would? Let's say Israel leaves Gaza alone; for their part, the Egyptians either keep their own blockade in effect or don't, whichever, since they aren't criticized by Arab sources (one wonders why
). Now what? Will the rockets stop? Yes or no? When
would they stop?
Yes. Better to not report the total number of casualties and give the number of kids killed.. the babies are probably Hamas as well so they shouldn't count, should they?
No idea what you mean. My point was that the media tend to ignore the fact that most of the casualties are Hamas, not civilians...and you seem to be doing the same.
So what if Palestinians die.. according to fetus, they can just fart out some more kids and it will all be ok again.
Maybe you should call Hamas and tell them that this isn't a good strategy? And again: whose fault is it when parents usher their children into "martyrdom"?
genocide of course, so that they can get the rest of the land held by the "barbarians"
Funnily enough, this is Hamas'
actual plan.
Semantics regarding which words to use to describe this outrage is pointless.
It certainly isn't. When one side describes the fighting as a "genocide", it carries a specific and powerful meaning. It behooves us to understand whether or not the events really fit that picture.
Is it? Hamas doesn't seem to think so. That's why they use civilians as human shields.
Why do you think a people that had suffered grotesque injustice would if they gained control, take revenge by committing genocide upon the perpetrators? Because they are Muslim? Arab? This is what the Western media would have you believe.
Actually, that's pretty much Hamas' charter. The same genocidal bent towards Jews was taken by rhetoric in 1947 and 1948. Perhaps the Jews have learned not to ignore such rhetoric.
The above thinking is disturbing to say the least.
I quite agree.
Why does Hamas want civilian casualties?
Why do they approve so strongly of the use of civilians as human shields? And why does no one challenge them on this? Collective guilt? Fear of the accusation of "racism" or somesuch? Antisemitism? Who knows? But I agree completely that it's very disturbing. It suggests an inherent lack of respect for human life, and especially innocent life. I would suggest that this is a group that ought not - not unlike fascists or Nazis - not be in power anywhere at any time.
Since when is being a member of a democratically elected party a crime punishable by death?
?? I'm sorry, I'm not sure you understand the point here. Hamas is the government of Palestine, whatever their particular political-religious bent. One couldn't call 9/11, for example, an "anti-Republican" attack, if you follow me.
And the fact is, of the more that 700 fatalities (and rising), the vast majority are civilians, and a FULL THIRD are woman and children.
Did you have a link for this?
Cheers,
Geoff