The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

[CptBork]

c.) let the Posters or readers of this Forum know, for a fact, that "disinformation agents" are a reality, and whether or not they are deliberately disseminating the "disinformation" or just "parroting" or "repeating what they heard and accepted", it is still "disinformation"!

I think you've provided us with more than enough disinformation to remind us that it does indeed exist.

Now, as to the links that I posted in response to CptBork's query on "Jewish controlling the Mass Media" - well those were for the most part...how should I say?...specially "Chosen"!
Those links included "Jewish stars/celebrities/icons" openly stating or bragging/boasting of their control of "Hollywood/Mass Media" and of course the Link to the Youtube video by David Duke. Though CptBork claimed that I, dmoe, "obviously" had not watched it - indeed I had, and that was exactly why I posted it! I included the link to that video NOT because of WHO, but WHAT it contained!

I said you didn't read the article in your first link, nothing more. You chose an article written by a Jew with a title that appeared to support your contention. If you bothered to read it, you'd see that it didn't say Jews control the media, it said they deservedly exert a heavy influence and should not feel ashamed to do so just because they'll be stereotyped by clowns like you. Furthermore, who cares what it says? I asked for statistics and you link me to a Jew's personal anecdotal opinion, as if he's part of some great mass monolith conspiring to take your crummy house away.

I strongly suspect that CptBork did not watch it, or he would have seen that it was just a person presenting evidence of the "Chosen People's" control as published by actual Jewish people themselves.

I had to stop watching after about 5 seconds before David Duke dropped my IQ any further. I really, honestly don't care what David Duke thinks or believes or what his friends think and believe about Jewish media control, anymore than I care about what they think about lynching black people and burning crosses.

However, a person who was "prejudicial" or "closed minded" or for whatever reason, not open to the "message" and cannot see beyond the MESSENGER would somehow "expose" their "True Colors", so to say.

Yup, they start off pretending to want an open dialogue, ask a bunch of stupidly pointed questions, then they dive into a drunken evil villain monologue about how they've revealed the truth about the Zionist disinformation world conspiracy and why it is that nothing which actually happens in the world seems to match what they predict.

quinnsong, if you get the opportunity, possibly you could watch it and again, possibly, get back to me with your thoughts on the "message" contained in it, as opposed to the "messenger" - perhaps.

Yeah, I hear if you get past the "stab stab kill kill" part, David Duke is actually a pretty decent fellow. We should spend our time studying his opinions rather than listening to some random guy off the street who's never been to prison.

Oh, and by the way - I never actually "accused" CptBork of being a "Zionist Disinformation Agent" - I rarely use the word "zionist" (yet, twice in this Post?!!?) - only that to me, dmoe, he seemed to use techniques that "Disinformation Agents" employ!

No, you were pretty much like "Aha! I've revealed you at last! Now let me play some dramatic music while I deliver the closing monologue and finish you off!"

 

[dumbest man on earth]

I can remember my Grandmother saying the Jews ran Hollywood and the American media and also one of my dearest friends who is Jewish and a communist has said the same thing. DMOE, Jews like everyone else have political leanings which span right, left and middle, with extremists on both sides. Some Jews are Pro Palestinian and some would like to bomb them from the planet, my point is if a Jew's politics run the spectrum so will their viewpoints. If in fact they do run the media then you are getting just about every mainstream and non mainstream viewpoint anyway, so what is the harm? As long as the media allows David Dukes viewpoint (which repulses me mostly)to be heard as well as any other racist or anyone else then I ask you again where is the harm? Do you think there is an ultimate agenda if the Jews do own the media in America?

Truthfully, I do not read from sites that are known hatemongers or conspiracists, even if they happen upon the truth sometime their credibility is shot in my book. BTW, Jews have played very important roles in my life and they are just like me, except they are not Irish. There is a thread called Jews in the history thread if you are interested.

quinnsong, I have to agree whole heartedly with your Post. I, myself, have several Jewish friends and although we sometimes kid one of them about being a "communist", he takes it all in good humor and points out that just because his Grandparents immigrated from Russia, that doesn't mean he cannot be a Republican!

To answer your question : If, and I repeat, if there is an "ultimate agenda" to the Jews owning the media in America, I would be inclined to opine that that "ultimate agenda" would probably be to make as much money as possible from that ownership.

For a frame of reference, two of the closest and dearest Lady friends that I have are both Jewish.
Maha was born and raised in Lebanon and just became a Naturalized U.S. citizen about 2 1/2 years ago. (age 43, I believe)
Samir, whom I first met in '79 or'80, holds Dual U.S./Israeli citizenship and often jokes that as "a perfect example of feminine beauty and sexuality - how could she ever have been born as anything other than one of the Chosen People?" ( age, still claims to be 29 - but her son just celebrated his 41st birthday, so...) Her husband is in his early 60's, but claims he sometimes feels like he is 99 when trying to keep up with her! ...but I digress...

I have no real ingrained problems or anxieties with anyone of any kind other than just one type of people - the Intentionally Ignorant! If you have ever met one of the Intentionally, and I stress INTENTIONALLY, Ignorant species of less-than-human being then you probably know the irrelevance of any other association in reality they may have.

I have found great people and great friendships can come from anywhere and even sometimes from...shall we say...not the best first few encounters...and leave it at that.

For the most part, I also mirror the sentiments in your last paragraph - with the stated exception that sometimes just as much, and on occasion, even a little more "Real Knowledge and Factual Information" can be gained or "gleaned" from what the "Guys in the Black Hats" ARE saying as well as what the "Guys in the White Hats" ARE NOT!!

 

[wegs]

You are so dramatic, CptBork.

Speaking of conflicting stories....

Who to believe....hmmm!

NBC reports that 80% of americans want congressional approval to strike Syria, while the Huff Post states that...'Americans don't want to bomb Syria.'
:shrug:

 

[dumbest man on earth]

Don't worry, David Duke says he's not a racist, he's merely a "racial realist". That lets DMOE off the hook, as long as he informs everyone that he's not a bigot before announcing that Jews control the media.

CptBork, one hook down, only a few Billion more to go...if I had the time or inclination to count...meh!

Name-calling...meh!

Did not "announce" anything...I stated!...and I stand by that statement!

 

[dumbest man on earth]

I think you've provided us with more than enough disinformation to remind us that it does indeed exist.



I said you didn't read the article in your first link, nothing more. You chose an article written by a Jew with a title that appeared to support your contention. If you bothered to read it, you'd see that it didn't say Jews control the media, it said they deservedly exert a heavy influence and should not feel ashamed to do so just because they'll be stereotyped by clowns like you. Furthermore, who cares what it says? I asked for statistics and you link me to a Jew's personal anecdotal opinion, as if he's part of some great mass monolith conspiring to take your crummy house away.



I had to stop watching after about 5 seconds before David Duke dropped my IQ any further. I really, honestly don't care what David Duke thinks or believes or what his friends think and believe about Jewish media control, anymore than I care about what they think about lynching black people and burning crosses.



Yup, they start off pretending to want an open dialogue, ask a bunch of stupidly pointed questions, then they dive into a drunken evil villain monologue about how they've revealed the truth about the Zionist disinformation world conspiracy and why it is that nothing which actually happens in the world seems to match what they predict.



Yeah, I hear if you get past the "stab stab kill kill" part, David Duke is actually a pretty decent fellow. We should spend our time studying his opinions rather than listening to some random guy off the street who's never been to prison.



No, you were pretty much like "Aha! I've revealed you at last! Now let me play some dramatic music while I deliver the closing monologue and finish you off!"

CptBork, I hope you do not think that by "just trying to be polite" to me, again, will make me more apt to use your "techniques" of "applied intelligent discourse" - you are...well...just something other than entirely correct!

Which, coincidentally, is also what you seem, to me at least, to be in your perception of me!

...meh!...

You should be here to Post on the topic of this Thread...not go on and on and on trying to get me to adopt you as my new best friend.

 

[Bells]

CptBork, I hope you do not think that by "just trying to be polite" to me, again, will make me more apt to use your "techniques" of "applied intelligent discourse" - you are...well...just something other than entirely correct!

Which, coincidentally, is also what you seem, to me at least, to be in your perception of me!

...meh!...

You should be here to Post on the topic of this Thread...not go on and on and on trying to get me to adopt you as my new best friend.

Then perhaps you should stop posting anti-Semitic David Duke rubbish on this site and in this thread as supposed proof of your claims and stick to the topic.

 

[dumbest man on earth]

Then perhaps you should stop posting anti-Semitic David Duke rubbish on this site and in this thread as supposed proof of your claims and stick to the topic.

The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

Is what you Posted above an attempt at open, honest and intelligent discussion?

The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

You used the term "anti-Semitic" - should I start Posting "Pro-Semitic Rubbish"?

The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

The Syrians are "Semites" - did I post something "anti-Syrian"?

The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

 

[Bells]

The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

Is what you Posted above an attempt at open, honest and intelligent discussion?

The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

You used the term "anti-Semitic" - should I start Posting "Pro-Semitic Rubbish"?

The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

The Syrians are "Semites" - did I post something "anti-Syrian"?

The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

I need to ask.. What the hell is with your posts? Why do you keep posting the same sentence over and over again? Are you posting from a mobile or something? Or do you have a need to repeat the same sentence over and over again in the same post?

Secondly, even linking crap from David Duke as though it is fact.. The man is, for lack of a better term, an anti-semitic, right wing, nationalistic and racist fuck-knuckle. Certainly, if you take his opinion and words as fact, then the questions posed about your leanings are warranted, especially in the context of this thread and what Syria and Iran's leanings represent.

 

[Captain Kremmen]

He's an antisemitic robot.
Oy vay, enough already!

 

[Robittybob1]

He's an antisemitic robot.
Oy vay, enough already!

Is it nerve gas or the plank for him?

 

[Captain Kremmen]

If it had never led to such tragic consequences it would be a harmless delusion.

 

[iceaura]

before announcing that Jews control the media.


Did not "announce" anything...I stated!...and I stand by that statement!

Rupert Murdoch, Roger Ailes, Jeff Bewkes, and Philip Dauman, are all Christian - that takes care of three of the four main media corporations in the US, and the most politically influential "news" broadcasters. The remaining, Walt Disney Corporation, has a Jewish CEO, but is not that much into news.

So don't go to Walt Disney movies, and you can avoid being brainwashed by the Zionist domination of US media.

 

[Captain Kremmen]

No doubt there will be good reasons why they are all Jews despite being Christian.
But the discussion is beginning to divert this thread.
I've started a new thread on the topic, "DO JEWS CONTROL THE MEDIA?".


http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?136048-Do-Jews-control-the-media&p=3105684#post3105684

 

[iceaura]

"DO JEWS CONTROL THE MEDIA?".

detail: it's "The Jews", not "Jews" - a critical distinction. Mere Jews could be anybody, not even organized.

 

[wegs]

Unless people have read through this thread, they won't understand the full context with which you intended that thread, Kremmen.
I think the thread's in poor taste, personally. :/

 

[dumbest man on earth]

Are Syrians "anti-semitic"?
Are Iranians "anti-semitic"?

Would it be right to assume/presume that all these Posters screaming "anti-semitic"- are indeed "pro-semitic"?

Would it be right to assume/presume that all these Posters that are "pro-semitic"- are somehow better people than those who are assumed/presumed as being "anti-semitic"?

The Title of this Thread is : The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

Would it be right to assume/presume that all these Posters that are "pro-semitic"- will help the Syrian people more than those who are assumed/presumed as being "anti-semitic"?

Most Posters on this Forum seem to be able to use the Internet - if you have that ability - use it to do research - find your own answers instead of accepting someone else's.

 

[wegs]

If a poster posts articles from what could be easily construed as anti-Semitic material, it helps other posters see where said person is coming from. If a poster wishes for ppl to view him or her as neutral in that regard, then posting articles from sites that are not anti Semitic in nature, would probably be wiser.

 

[Bells]

Unless people have read through this thread, they won't understand the full context with which you intended that thread, Kremmen.
I think the thread's in poor taste, personally. :/

His thread isn't in poor taste. It is hateful and utter rubbish.

Are Syrians "anti-semitic"?
Are Iranians "anti-semitic"?

Would it be right to assume/presume that all these Posters screaming "anti-semitic"- are indeed "pro-semitic"?

Would it be right to assume/presume that all these Posters that are "pro-semitic"- are somehow better people than those who are assumed/presumed as being "anti-semitic"?

The Title of this Thread is : The Syrian "Revolution": A Farce from Beginning to End

Would it be right to assume/presume that all these Posters that are "pro-semitic"- will help the Syrian people more than those who are assumed/presumed as being "anti-semitic"?

Most Posters on this Forum seem to be able to use the Internet - if you have that ability - use it to do research - find your own answers instead of accepting someone else's.

Oh cut the crap. You know exactly what context we meant in response to your David Duke conspiracy theory rubbish you were posting in this thread. Don't you dare try to twist it or project it onto anyone else.

 

[quinnsong]

Kerry leaves open the possibility of boots on the ground in Syria if the Assad regime collapses and al-Qaida linked extremist groups could possibly get their hands on his chemical weapons.


Well if the military strikes are meant to degrade Assad's military capabilities and he falls, then this is a very likely scenario and I for one cannot get behind the strikes. If Kerry cannot guarantee "no boots on the ground" I am out.

There are approximately a thousand different faction groups fighting, a freakin thousand, what a goddamn mess. How in the hell is this even possible?

 

[Bells]

Kerry leaves open the possibility of boots on the ground in Syria if the Assad regime collapses and al-Qaida linked extremist groups could possibly get their hands on his chemical weapons.


Well if the military strikes are meant to degrade Assad's military capabilities and he falls, then this is a very likely scenario and I for one cannot get behind the strikes. If Kerry cannot guarantee "no boots on the ground" I am out.

If the Assad regime collapses without US or Western intervention and there is a risk of al Qaeda linked groups getting their hands on those weapons, would you want boots on the ground then to secure those weapons?