surenderer said:
You mean besides the ones that carried to World while Europe was crawling around in the Dark Ages
Could you re-write this a little more clearly, I have no idea what this sentence means? “carries ones”? One what?
I do not understand why you are so adamant about referring to Europe in this regards?
I am not European, and if I were, it still
doesn’t matter. Why not make a comparison with China or Japan? Or better yet, make a comparison with Tahiti or Hawaii? It’ll carry as much weight. But, as you insist in continuing with this “
European” comparison, then I will ask you:
1) Why, surrender, was the Islamic ME so prosperous during the period that the Europeans call the “Dark Ages”? Did it have
ANYTHING to do with Islam?
If so what?
Because, get this, the Mediterranean has been a wealthy area for a few millennia before Islam was invented. But, I digress, if you insist in making this “European” comparison all of the time, then do me the favor and explain what exactly the comparison
IS.
Incidentally, as I’ve said before, I propose that it was this “
bottleneck” on trade which allowed the ME to get rich, prompted the crusades and ultimately motivated the Europeans to find ways around the ME. Once the Europeans had established new trade routes, bypassing the ME all together – well, the ME lost its wealth, power, and influence and the Europeans flourished.
2) That is not to say there are no comparisons to be made, I can think of a very good comparison to be made with Dark Age Europe and Islamic Middle East.
The period known as the
Dark Ages in Europe is also the rise of a belief in some asinine Middle Eastern God and these ancient Europeans were foolish enough to allow themselves to be ruled by people purporting to do this Middle Eastern God's will (See: Holy Roman/German Empire).
Decline in the belief of (and thus rule via) this Middle Eastern God is called the
Renaissance.
Unfortunately for the people of the ME today, similar to their European counterparts, they believe in this very same God, and they are ruled by people just as the ancient Europeans were, and they are just as bad off as the ancient Europeans were.
So yes, I do see a comparison.
Belief in God = Bad Dark Ages
No belief in God = Good Renaissance
surenderer said:
the reason why Islamic Nations are lagging behind Western Nations(financally) is because Sharia premits Muslims from charging Interest or usury......
Haaa!!!
1) KSA has TRILLIONS of dollars – so try again.
2) Sharia Law and it’s effects on Usury says absolutely
NOTHING on why the ME continued with the Institution of Slavery (which unlike that
Evil notion called
Usury) was
accepted in Islam.
I would categorize “Slavery” in with the Lagging behind the West.Wouldn't YOU?
But you may be correct, maybe Islamic restrictions on usury
kept profits down, inadvertently keeping the “less Islamic restricted” institution of Slavery alive a well for
well over a
thousand years. Surrender, you may have unintentionally stumbled upon yet another fundamental flaw with Islam and the Qur’an.
** You’ll be surprised to learn that there are a number of Islamic Banks that follow, if not the spirit, at least the letter of the Sharia law. It’ll be funny to see if you are right and Islamic countries do well to
skirt around the fundamentals of the Qur’an in favor of a Westernized approach to fiscal monetary policies. Just one more step in the long line that will be walked before Islam is finally accepted as a hindrance to society and removed by the very people that practice it (much like the Xians did in Europe)
3) There are
MANY poor countries and societies in the world, there needn’t be an “Islamic” excuse. It could be that for many different reasons the ME will remain poor – Islamic or not Islamic. Maybe it’s a reflection on Arabic culture in general and has little to do with Islam if any at all?
surenderer said:
but a Muslims reward is in the next life.....not this one
......
This has got to be the most insidious joke ever played on someone. Yeah, give me your time devotion and money now and I’ll pay you back after we’re dead.
Really - just crazy!
surenderer said:
Now what was it that you believed in again? I noticed you still didnt answer me
I believe a number of things. Like asking why, when, where, who, how come, and trying to take as little on “faith” as I possibly can. I do not believe in universal ethics or morals although I think, as all people share many similarities, we naturally share ethics and morals. I think the manner in which many citizens of KSA treat their women is utterly revolting. The idea of a morality police is Orwellian and disturbing and the fact that morality police are supported by a society and that they’d rather lock little girls in a burning school then let them be seen without proper attire is, well,
beyond words. The types of brainwashing it took for NK Dear Leader to form his cult of personality is equally as bizarre and despicable. However, I do not think it is my right to force or trick or coerce any of these societies to abide by
my codes or ethics and rules of behavior. So, what do I believe? I believe you should figure it out for yourself and that the best way to do that is to question, debate, challenge, care for one another and when you can and if for the right reasons - change. So of course – I’m
Atheist