I was going to go back and show how every claim (almost all. I think string theory was new) has been shot down over and over in this very thread. I was going to lambast you for being a thread flirter and post links to all the refutations. But, I'm far too disinterested in trying to disprove you of your ignorance.
However, I will say this. Your desire to marry your religion with science shows desperation and a short-sightedness. Why? Because science is not stationary. Your religion is the word of god, right? And you're trying to prove that it is the word of god by attaching it to science? Well, what are you going to do when the theories change? Are you going to say that you never said that?
For instance, the big bang. It may not have happened. It's a THEORY.
String THEORY is highly speculative at the moment and there is no evidence for its existence.
Black holes are a mathematical anomoly and may not exist.
Orbits. Atomic theory is theory. Electrons don't really orbit. It's only a convention.
And if you still have doubts, the Koran has forseen this too;
Even if We opened out to them a gate from heaven, and they were to continue (all day) ascending therein, They would only say: "Our eyes have been intoxicated: Nay, we have been bewitched by sorcery (15:14-15)
In other words, if any believe other than you then they are bewitched by sorcery. Only you are right. Or rather your masters who bewitched you. When's the last original thought that went through your head I wonder?
he sources I used to back the words of the Quran were; Martin Rees, Master of Trinity College Cambridge Stephen W. Hawking Lucasian Professor of mathematics, Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge ,Steven Weinberg,Paul Davies. These are of the world's best and most respected scientists. Who are your sources or scientists? Who are these mad wide eyed scientists that you claim have denied the proofs of the Quran in a ''very scientific and convincing manner''. Has anyone ever even heard of them or have they contributed anything to the world of science?
It's not what the scientists say but the way they are misunderstood and misinterpreted by your masters who so foolishly seek to wed their religion to science.
I dare you to send any of those scientists on that list an email and ask them if they agree with your interpretration of their words.
Lock this thread.