A good hypothesis is testable. But the theory of a god is one that attempts say something absolute about this world. A world with a god is much different from one without. So I'll repeat my point from before:
Is somebody disagreeing with you about something and explaining why they disagree with you evangelism? If I argued what caused WWI and gave some explanations which indicate why I'm right, would you call it evangelism?
Only when he says his unfalsifiable beliefs are better than my unfalsifiable beliefs.
Everything he did had nothing to do with the claims of theists.
Yours is a twisted deranged view, unfounded and biased in every way.
But, you are free to demonstrate that Pol Pot did what he did in the name of atheism.
You're on deck, sam, go for it...
"The Khmer Rouge targeted Buddhist monks, Western-educated intellectuals (apart from themselves), educated people in general, people who had contact with Western countries or with Vietnam, people who appeared to be intellectuals (for example, individuals with glasses), the crippled and lame, and ethnic minorities like ethnic Chinese, Laotians and Vietnamese."
So? Theists kill other theists don't they, even within a religion? No big deal. He was a narrow minded atheist with no vision or intellect. There are plenty of those. He not only killed people who opposed his beliefs he killed everyone who opposed him.
The athiest regime in Soviet Union sent people to the gulags for showing up late on work too. Militant atheists are crazy people.:shrug: