SAM said:I see no reason to wade through 400 pages of the rhetoric that he continually makes in his articles and lectures.
I think I've reached the extent of debate based on Dawkins arguments from speeches etc. I can see I need to read the book to marshall further arguments. So I'll concede that I need more information and get back on this.
I'll continue this discussion in the God Delusion review thread. I like Geoffs idea of reviewing the book and I'll try to add my own comments there.
Thanks for the great discussion btw.
There was no discussion with you as you did nothing but lie the entire thread. What comments could you possibly add to that other thread that wouldn't be a lie? Who the fuck do you think you are?
There was no discussion with you as you did nothing but lie the entire thread. What comments could you possibly add to that other thread that wouldn't be a lie?
I think that is a question you should be asking yourself Q.Who the fuck do you think you are?
That's a bit harsh.
When are you guys going to do something about Sam? Or, is her conduct acceptable as a moderator?