How do you date a petroglyph?
I do not know.
How do you date a petroglyph?
Actually, all the evidence would prove is that Jews were in Egypt and then left. It would say nothing about whether Jewish or Christian theology is factual. In the same way, I could write a sci-fi novel featuring the events of 9/11, but the fact that 9/11 happened wouldn't prove the whole book was non-fiction....How much more important, crucial even, is the attitude (humility and trust) toward this particular text that lays out (REVEALS what an otherwise lack of evidence would keep hidden) the early events of the nation of Israel and their role in the Divine plan of Redemption for humanity; all culminating in the Incarnation of Jesus Christ and His message of repentance and faith in Him.
Well, there goes your evidence.I do not know.
Well, there goes your evidence.
Unfortunately, if you can't demonstrate for us on this forum with a link or otherwise that it is from the correct time period, then you must abandon it as evidence in support of your argument.So I tell you the truth that I don't know and the Petroglyph disappears into thin air.
That would be a miracle, there is hope for you.
OK, if that is what you really want?
I just think it should be investigated by someone who might have a shot at doing it correctly instead of me.
The information on this site may interest you.
https://againstjebelallawz.wordpress.com/jebel-al-lawz/
Unfortunately, if you can't demonstrate for us on this forum with a link or otherwise that it is from the correct time period, then you must abandon it as evidence in support of your argument.
Otherwise you are using a technique known as the Gish Gallop.
The Gish Gallop is the debating technique of drowning the opponent in such a torrent of small arguments that their opponent cannot possibly answer or address each one in real time. More often than not, these myriad arguments are full of half-truths, lies, and straw-man arguments — the only condition is that there be many of them, not that they be particularly compelling on their own.
Lots of crappy evidence doesn't add up to good evidence.
Coral does not grow that fast as to cover it in a matter of months to preserve it.All the items found were covered in coral to make coral formations, this could of helped preserve the different objects found.
If metal ships, sunk in the last 100 years are so corroded that they warn divers to not touch them or tie ropes to any parts of it because it will break it, do you really think very thin pieces of wood would have survived that long or maintained its shape like that?Because they became part of coral formations.
I doubt anyone in their right mind would accept something so flimsy as being evidence of anything.What annoys me is that if this was evidence for evolution for example, or some agenda you support, you would be saying they were legit.
As far as I'm concerned, I don't mind either way, true or false, but when i smell bullshit i like to check it out.
I'm not saying you are doing that, but you are getting close. Also your notion that chariot wheels were discovered in the Dead Sea is an obvious hoax.
http://www.snopes.com/religion/redsea.asp
You should really not depend on that for your argument.
Did Wyatt have anything to do with the video clip?
The video you linked was produced by someone called Michael Rood.Did Wyatt have anything to do with the video clip?
I agree with you.The video you linked was produced by someone called Michael Rood.
The full video can be purchased on the WND site..
Here is a video of Michael Rood discussing Ron Wyatt's discovery...
Michael Rood tells about the real Red Sea crossing site and Ron Wyatt who found it. Ron Wyatt followed the Bible literally and the Lord partnered with him in finding biblical sites. Rood went to Ron's home and asked questions, then went out in the field to see the discoveries himself.
So what do you think Ron Wyatt had to do with the video clip?
OK, that was another member, sorry.I did not post that.
One of the most disturbing things about these issues is that people go out and spend money to support those like Ron Wyatt and other 'treasure hunters' and then you have those who try and encourage people to spend money to support these people, such as what we see in the OP of this very thread, where Seti encourages people to buy tickets because it might be a sellout.I agree with you.
Thanks for spending the time to explain the situation
Who supposed that?But finding an anchient Menorah Petroglyph at the Real Mt. Sinai, in a place where the Hebrews supposedly have never been?
One of the most disturbing things about these issues is that people go out and spend money to support those like Ron Wyatt and other 'treasure hunters' and then you have those who try and encourage people to spend money to support these people, such as what we see in the OP of this very thread, where Seti encourages people to buy tickets because it might be a sellout.
The people who go out and pull these kinds of stunts have no expertise or qualifications, often destroy and damage archaeological sites or the environment (such as Ron Wyatt lifting giant pieces of coral out of the water to prove it was a wheel - he never did, but think of the ecological damage he caused by doing so). And then when Governments and Governing bodies fence off these areas to preserve rock art, archaeological sites and even the ecology of the area, these people cry foul and claim it is a conspiracy.
Ron Wyatt has claimed to have found everything, from Noah's Ark to the blood splatter from Christ's crucifixion. All unproven. More concerning is that he often films or photographs himself and his sons digging for these things, with no idea or clue what they are doing, and all illegally. Israel, for example, have strict laws for archaeological digs. The same applies for other Middle Eastern countries. You cannot do it without having a permit and you cannot obtain a permit without having a degree in the respective fields. The reason for that is simple. Israel and the Middle East area is littered with archaeological wonders, with caves that housed early hominids in the first waves from Africa through to Roman archaeology. Can you imagine the damage people like Wyatt and his cohorts do when they go there and just start digging anywhere and everywhere?
And people give them money because they convince then to fund them to prove the bible. They aren't proving anything. They have nothing to show for any of it. They refuse to have anything dated or tested. All they have are their claims and what they say they discovered. They are, in effect, fraudulent.