Oh I think poisoning neighbourhood cats would indicate severe mental issues quite clearly as well, as does being neutral when it comes to killing cats and dogs. You fucking psycho (in the literal sense, not in a cool or tough way). .
Poisoning animals might actually be more telling, in my experience people inclined to poison anything, even plants or insects, tend to have strangely destructive tendencies and lack a conscience in general. It's only more cowardly and perverse, no less cruel than slaughtering with a knife or club.
I think this little faggot's face should be plastered everywhere, hopefully someone rapes his twink ass with shards of glass.
That guy should be assigned to a mental institution and never let out.
No, I wasn't being sarcastic. I would beat him to a pulp, ill or not.
What would you do to a person that is killing and mutilating your kids one by one ? Would you say "Aww poor guy, he's mentally ill" ?
So if he kills cats he just needs mental help, but if he kills your kids..
I KNOW you would kick his ass..
Parrots, Miner birds and parakeets can talk.
Well said Lou !I always get creeped out by these arguments that animals don't have the rights of humans because they're not as intelligent or they don't talk or whatever, I just don't see how any of these things in any way make them more deserving of cruelty, or that it's less of an attrocity to torture and murder them. In my mind it seems obviously quite the opposite.
I can't think of any human as innocent or undeserving of poor treatment as an animal like a dog or cat, regardless of intelligence or ability to speak or wear pants or whatever, I fail to see how those things are even mildly relavent.
The ability of a human to understand makes it all the less cruel, there's something especially wrong about torture/cruelty/etc directed towards animals BECAUSE they are less intelligent and unable to communicate their feelings etc. In precisely the same way crimes against children are all the more unpalatable.
The logic of the general public's perception is inconsistent, with humans it gets more and more attrocious and awful the more innocent and naive and unaware the victim, then with animals it's no big deal because they're too innocent and naive and unaware.
In my mind, and heart, cruelty to humans is quite trivial in relation to cruelty to animals. It's how I naturally feel and also it seems to logically make sense.
And you don't see how absurd your statement is in this context ?Well if you think violence is alright then you should be prepared to face it yourself when someone else thinks they are justified to use violence on or against you.
I have a hard time believing that.I wouldn’t and I would actually try getting him the proper help he needed to prevent this from ever happening again. The loss of my child would be huge and difficult, but hate and vengeance isn’t any good and wouldnt solve anything. (been in this same situation)
I always get creeped out by these arguments that animals don't have the rights of humans because they're not as intelligent or they don't talk or whatever, I just don't see how any of these things in any way make them more deserving of cruelty, or that it's less of an attrocity to torture and murder them. In my mind it seems obviously quite the opposite.
I can't think of any human as innocent or undeserving of poor treatment as an animal like a dog or cat, regardless of intelligence or ability to speak or wear pants or whatever, I fail to see how those things are even mildly relavent.
The ability of a human to understand makes it all the less cruel, there's something especially wrong about torture/cruelty/etc directed towards animals BECAUSE they are less intelligent and unable to communicate their feelings etc. In precisely the same way crimes against children are all the more unpalatable.
The logic of the general public's perception is inconsistent, with humans it gets more and more attrocious and awful the more innocent and naive and unaware the victim, then with animals it's no big deal because they're too innocent and naive and unaware.
In my mind, and heart, cruelty to humans is quite trivial in relation to cruelty to animals. It's how I naturally feel and also it seems to logically make sense.
And you don't see how absurd your statement is in this context ? .
I have a hard time believing that.
What would you do if you caught the killer/mutilator in the act ?
Just call the police and then watch how he mutilates and kills your kids until the police arrive ? I can tell you this, the police will put a bullet in his head.
you see my point orleander?
if you still dont re-read especially norsefires post
Not all people who kill animals cross over to kill people, so to assume this guy will is wrong IMO. Some might argue that evidence and statistics prove all serial killers stared killing animals when they were younger but this still doesn’t mean this guy will. My neighbors have some pesky cats and I wish this guy had lived in my neighborhood before he was caught.
I can't imagine how those people must have suffered when they found their pets like that. That guy should be assigned to a mental institution and never let out.
Don't you think he needs to be convicted first?
he looks guilty. like the cat who ate the canary. he should be more upset and frowning.
Good thing they found him now, though. People like this could end up evolving to killing and mutilating people.
So, say for example, a kid has Downs syndrome and hurts a number of cats...?
I know this kid doesn't. I'm stretching the scenario because I'm trying to find out where the limitations on beating up a mentally ill child goes.
I agree. Let's not get out of hand here, beautiful.... I'm just saying that this "mental condition" needs some sort of attention, which doesn't include "tar and feathering", nor locking him up for life. Rather, I am asking you, what is your rational answer? How do we balance society's right to avoid serial killers with the individual's rights to be who he / she is?