Sheesh if you are going to quote Hirsi Ali to me we are not going to have a conversation.
Well, that's your choice to make.
Her entire story is made up to get refugee status and citizenship in the Netherlands
No it wasn't. Have you actually read any of her books?
and she now works for a Zionist neocon group [American Enterprise Institute] in the US.
She did mention in her book "Infidel" that she went to work for a think tank and I believe it was of the conservative bent. As to whether or not it is jewish leanings, you may know more about that then me. If she has gone a bit too far against islam after she wrote infidel, I think it's understandable- a film making friend of hers who she made a film with was killed and she was sequestered away for a long time so that they didn't do the same to her. She's not the only person to whom this has happened- Salman Rushdie was the first. SAM, I can respect your points concerning the dark side of the Israelies, but it seems you turn a blind eye towards the dark side of islam.
Say someone like Fareed Zakaria or even reformers like Asghar Ali Engineer or Shirin Ebadi and I'm willing to listen. Don't wave zionists and neocons in my face.
Unfortunately, I don't know of Fareed, Asghar or Shirin. If I did, I could perhaps have spoken of them as well. As it stands, she's the only muslim woman I know who I found to be a fairly intelligent person.
I used to sympathise with the Jews in Israel until I learned the full history of the nakba.
I just googled it- it seems it has to do with jews losing lands?
Now I can only wonder that with so many eyewitnesses, so little is circulated about it and how easily Palestinians are considered as terrorists while the Israelis are considered as democrats.
SAM, I for one don't see things that black and white. Neither do many more. Just found this link posted 3 hours ago:
Global media executives protest Gaza press ban
With tricks like maintaining a demographic minority of Arabs [kept back as labourers during the nakba] and "allowing" them to vote, they can get away with daily missile strikes against an imprisoned people with no arms
No arms? I know that the Israelies outgun the palestinians, but let's not get carried away. From the link I just cited: "After a recent upsurge in Palestinian rocket fire..."
...and sustain a two year blockade with ineffectual international protests that do not give any succour to the Palestinians.
The situation is definitely messy. However, I think one must also recognize the fact that the hostilities come from both sides.
They can kidnap an elected parliament and call them terrorists...
Surely you recognize that Hamas has done things that can certainly qualify as terroristic acts? Ofcourse, Israel has -also- done many things that could qualify as such. I'm just saying that Hamas aren't all angels. However, I do agree with you that they were democratically elected.
they can keep the money of the Palestinians
Keep the money of the palestinians? Are you saying that the palestinians are giving them money? Or that they're not giving the palestinians the money they used to?
and use it to build walls and checkpoints like the Nazis and call it defense.
The Nazis simply killed many jews outright in concentration camps. The same isn't happening in the case of the palestinians.
They can cut off the access of the Palestinians to their agricultural land and create an absentee law to give it to Jews, bulldoze their homes, cut off their drinking water to fill swimming pools, shoot rubber bullets into the eyes of their children and STILL, they are the victims.
I agree that they have committed many injustices. But you only mention what the jews have done- you don't seem to mention anything the palestinians have done...
And any Israeli who sustains this society is complicit in all this. They all do two years of compulsory military service and participate in the occupation.
The service is compulsory- I imagine that they face jail time if they don't do it. If we want to talk about complicity, why not go straight to america, that provides weaponry and finances a lot of Israel's military exploits? Or to the arab countries that help finance the bloody side of the intifadah?
And if you speak out against this, you are a Jew-hating moronic bigot and an anti-semite with extreme views.
There are different ways of speaking out, I believe. You can say that the isralies are demons and the palestinians innocent victims. Or you can say that both sides have their flaws. Clearly the Israelies have the upper hand militarily, just as americans have the upper hand militarily in Afghanistan and Iraq. This doesn't meant that the israelies or the americans are all demons and their opponents innocent victims, it just means they've got more firepower and therefore have a greater capacity to do harm.
The worst, in my view, is when either side beings to play it fast and loose with 'collateral' damage. As in, well, we hit this target because someone we wanted to kill might be there and to hell with everyone else who may be there at the same time. This, in my view, may seem to work in the short term, but in the long term is a very sloppy way of doing things, and has the capacity of creating more opponents then one started out with. I think it's a big reason that Bill Clinton's Somali enterprise didn't work and I also think it's a big reason that Iraq has finally put its foot down and has worked out that the U.S. leave its lands in 2011.