Rape: The Megathread
- Thread starter Randwolf
- Start date
Same here. If I see ANYONE being discriminated against I think that's wrong and I'll say so.
You got that right. Regardless of labels though, it is the radicals in any movement that give the legitimate issues a black eye. I think that femnazis make themselves look ridiculous by some of the notions they advocate. This list being a prime example.
Not biased or inflammatory in any way, is it?
Oh, and my personal favorite is:
Because women wouldn't / couldn't ever lie, right?
Funny how it is always 'the radicals' that do this right? It is easy to simply dismiss everything as 'radical' when it is so widespread.
Also, it is common feminist dogma that anyone who dares to question the validity of a claim to rape is a supporter of rape. In fact this is generally considered a key element to 'rape culture' that people would dare to consider concepts such as innocent till proven guilty. The common claim is that no woman would ever lie about something so serious, and if you even think that a single woman would lie about it, then you are a woman hater.
I've already posted the quote plenty of times already, and even made a thread about it. I am sorry that you are too much of an illiterate piece of shit to ever see it. Even in the past you never did come out against any of the statements that Orleander ever made about violence towards men.
Hell here is an old example of sexist Orleander encouraging violence against men, and you refused to say anything about it then either. Might be due to your pattern of defending violence against men.
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1719164&postcount=40
Then again, anytime someone dares to come out and hold men and women to the same standards you simply start to shout about how they must be anti-woman if they want men and women treated the same.
Then why do feminists constantly hold men and women to different standards? I've brought up plenty of these in the past, but you are too much of a tool to care.
Looks like the misandrist is back to spouting hate speak again.
Why don't you start finding some evidence of this instead of simply spouting misandry?
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=76623
Wait what? I made a thread about how women should be expected to produce an equal share of money to deal with the bills, but I guess that was really me talking about how they should be chained to the stove, right?
You are just trash and that is all that there is to it.
Rape mentality is right up there with rape culture on feminist lies that they attempt to spread their misandry on the general public.
no its not. you can twist words to suit your beliefs any way you want. Poked condoms are NOT rape.
How does one "get someone else drunk"? Even if they say "oh come on, have another" the individual actually doing the drinking is still responsible. Aren't they?
I don't think that you understand. The feminist logic is that the predatory male 'gets' girls drunk, and not that a woman could ever simply consume alcohol without being forced into doing such. This logic absolves the woman from any responsability with regards to her own behaivor, while making sure that males take all the blame.
LOL That's cute!
This double standard that is regularly pushed by feminists is hardly cute.
No, but "feminist logic" is...
The thought that the crap the feminists spew out could be considered logic is funny, especially when you look at the whole lateral / vertical logic stuff.
I thought the question was "if the man got the girl drunk" If he pushed the booze while telling her he would safely get her home and then rapes her....
There are male friends that women trust, that rape those friends.
If a guy was out with his friend, the guy gave him drinks and then sodomized him while he was drunk off his ass, that's rape.
Women and men drink with people they trust. They let their guard down with peopel they trust. Another person can get you drunk using that trust against you.
I don't know about this. Did he give consent? And on a related matter, it seems that people who have been drinking are no longer allowed to have sex. Or shouldn't be. Or something...
I guess I should insist on blood alcohol tests when evaluating whether yes means yes. We have finally, openly arrived at the point that "no" always means "no", and "yes" sometimes means "no". Geeesh...
Exactly!! what I have been saying.
What Orleander said was:
Did you actually ask her why she hit him? Have you considered the fact that maybe he grabbed her ass or otherwise assaulted her?
I've said it before, MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD BE JUDGED BY THE SAME STANDARDS, NOW STOP CALLING ME A MISANDRIST. I've already said in this thread that it is wrong to discriminate against ANYONE. Not very misandrist is it?
No, what you did was rant about how 'women' in general want to loot your bank account. That's not posting a constructive discussion, that's pointless hysterical ranting.
How the FUCK do you expect to have a reasoned debate when you keep posting personal insults?
I notice that you did not actually answer my point, you just spewed insults. How about actually arguing back?
Ya, because it's perfectly fine and acceptable to dismiss a woman by saying she needs to have someone's dick forced into her mouth. How would it be if I used some female equivalent of that expression, implying that men's tongues were for giving oral sex, not for arguing or expresing opinions? You'd call me a misandrist, and you'd be right, but when it's the other way around you think that's okay. Very egalitarian.
You're going to have to post it. I mean, you know the old joke about fat girls and mopeds, don't you? How they're both fun to ride until your friends see you! Well, that's where beer goggles come in.