Argument ad Ignorantiam at it's finest.scientists don't know what gravity is, so why couldn't it be telekinesis?
There isn't a single shred of observed evidence to sudgest this as a logical possibility.i think it makes sense and it explains why things attract.
False analogy, Men and woman dont actualy attract by thoughts, those thoughts create other thoughts which then drive their motor-functions.we already know that thoughts make men and women attract, so maybe it's similar for particles and planets?
andbna said:Argument ad Ignorantiam at it's finest.
Men and woman dont actualy attract by thoughts,
Next, 'telekinesis' simply moves the problem back a step, what then is telekinesis and what causes it?
Finally, in order for thoughts to exist, there needs to be life, and life requires gravity to have existed eons before.
scientists don't know what gravity is, so why couldn't it be telekinesis? i think it makes sense and it explains why things attract.
we already know that thoughts make men and women attract, so maybe it's similar for particles and planets?
spacetimecurviture? don't even give me that shit... it explains nothing and there is no proof of it and it makes no sense (space can't bend its nothing, time can't bend its a sensation)
read my post here if you don't believe it: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=71977
if gravity is telekinesis it changes everything. it means that universe is not physical, it's mental like a dream. consciousness didnt come from matter, mind created and designed life and everything. its the only thing that makes sense!!
every atom is alive. how else do you explain atomic motion? a thing can move only if there is willpower. life doesn't require gravity, gravity requires life.
Argument ad ignorantiam still holds no matter how credible/discredible an opposing theory is: the point is is that it doesn't matter; proof that the opposing theory is false, or as of yet unprooven, is not proof that your theory is correct. Of course, you didnt even proove the opposing theroy was false, instead you offer an Appeal to Ridicule which might stem from a lack of understanding for the theory (which again, is not proof that it is false.)spacetimecurviture? don't even give me that shit... it explains nothing and there is no proof of it and it makes no sense (space can't bend its nothing, time can't bend its a sensation)
I won't address whether that post contains any truth or not because frankly, the analogy is still false, mental attraction, even explained the that post, is still chemical, and scientific, with no relevance to 'telekinesis.'read my post here if you don't believe it: http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=71977
Pretty big if, and since there is absolutly no proof for the theory, the conclusions drawn from the 'if's are meaningless... might this be some more appeal to emotion?if gravity is telekinesis it changes everything. it means that universe is not physical, it's mental like a dream. consciousness didnt come from matter, mind created and designed life and everything.
I thought Yorda was Yoda.
cosmictraveler said:So therefore you need someone to create the tele·ki·ne·sis to start off with and I don't believe that any human being can use it to move planets, galaxies, or constelations. If so please tell me who.
I thought Yorda was Yoda.
No: some believe there are.there are many paranormal abilities,
You do know that's a fictional TV series?phasing for example. it means that you can go through solid objects. you change your atomic vibration simply by thinking that you can go through walls. theres a guy in heroes who can do this.
You don't seem to understand that this is pure speculation with no supporting evidence whatsoever.you don't seem to understand that planets, galaxies and every single atom in the universe has these telekinetic powers
Wishful thinking.what's special about humans is that we are the only ones who can gain conscious control of this power and move objects with with it.
And pigs flew with them?a long time ago there were people who were so good at using this energy that they didn't need to create airplanes because they could fly without them.
You.. see things?Well then, fantasy it is; the world from up here is fantastic.
No: some believe there are.
None proven.
You do know that's a fictional TV series?
Wishful thinking.
And pigs flew with them?
Yorda, get an education.
what kind of education do you mean? in my country it's impossible to be uneducated because education is obligatory.
Subconscious implies thatyour brain has something to do with it, which it doesn't.logical thinking. if we can generate gravity subconsciously, then of course it's possible to do it consciously too.
Wow...There's no reason for anyone to comment on this. At all.only if pigs were in their wagons. later when humans devolved, they couldn't fly anymore so they let the lions pull their wagons. they controlled the lions with their thoughts. they couldn't use horses because they didn't exist yet.
No scientists test and repeat the test to see if it holds up.scientists think that they believe when they see it. but they don't understand that seeing is not believing; believing is seeing.
Ooooh, maybe.it was just an example. i don't know any real example, but maybe reality is fiction too.
Logical thinking? Barely qualifies as "thinking" let alone "logical".logical thinking. if we can generate gravity subconsciously, then of course it's possible to do it consciously too.
Arrant nonsense or total bollocks.only if pigs were in their wagons. later when humans devolved, they couldn't fly anymore so they let the lions pull their wagons. they controlled the lions with their thoughts. they couldn't use horses because they didn't exist yet.
Doesn't show.what kind of education do you mean? in my country it's impossible to be uneducated because education is obligatory.