crazymikey said:
Yet, what's interesting; most abductees are not even at home, when they claim to be abducted. What is also interesting; thousands upon thousands of abductees report the same circumstances and procedures of an abduction all over the world; all having the same delusion? nonsense.
Also interesting; identical incision marks and implants found in the body. Also interesting, disappearing fetus's in pregnant women.
Were you listening? Temporal Lobe Epilepsy produces the same symptoms in everyone, so everyone who suffers from it who believes in ETs would have the exact same experience. One thing that would vary, would be the appearance of the ET, hence the 58 odd categories that 'abductees' have seen, and why many see 'greys' those being the most popular image of ETs.
The surgery etc, would be easy to prove it were happening, there would be real physical evidence, like, we'd see the implants, and have studied them in detail. Of course, why aliens need to use invasive surgery techniques, when people of their technical acumen would have better imaging techniques than MRI, and undoubtedly developed nanobots to perform such tasks escapes me. Odd they can't adequately anaesthetise humans either, isn't it?
Disappearing foetus from a pregnant woman is called a miscarriage. It happens quite a lot. I'd have a brother else.
Abductions happening outdoors, perhaps sleepwalking? A combination of issues?
Actually, I am presenting evidence for it. You are presenting, 2nd hand figures, from an unknown site, which could be questionable.
That's rich, your 'evidence' is transcripts on web sites. If it were real evidence, there woul dbe no debate of the existence of ETs. But there is, so what does that say about your the quality of your 'evidence'?
Again, you are dictating what the aliens can or can't do. What makes you think, it was a bullet? You are so ignorant, it's not even funny.
So, this guy got 'cobalt radiation', which I've already explained is a meaningless term, as Cobalt emit two out of the three known types of radiation. So it is safe to assume that this guy meant that he recieved a dose of radiation after coming into contact with cobalt which came from an Alien weapon. Hmm, getting hit in the chest with a metal that came from an alien weapon, ... sound like a bullet? Or don't you attempt to build a picture of what transpired? I'm not dictating what aliens can do either, rather forming a hypothesis from the 'data' I've been presented with. That's what scientists do, ....
What a ingenious display of lateral thinking. Let me see, if I get this, so because the word sounds impressive to you, he must have made the term up on purpose?
No, I'm saying he picked a word which _he_ probably thought sounded impressive. you don't think it's a little too much of a coincidence that a Geologist picked a word to use which is a Geologial term?
Retire. Secondly, how do you know, what the clearence codes should be called? What if he said; willybillytilly-35-clearence - that's not impressive sounding - would that have been ok?
How do I know what clearance codes should be called? Oh, I dunno, perhaps having friends who work for Government research agencies, who deal with secrets, and having worked on computer systems which handle sensitive data might give me a clue?
ROFL - You've clearly have shown how little you know about science, the scientific method, and the history of science. You're a pseudoscientist, I honestly believe so. Not only that, but your deduction and comprehension skills are abysmal.
You 'believe' me to be a pseudoscientist. That says it all, that you ar still willing to 'believe' something which has been clearly demonstrated not to be the case.
And yet you still dodge the question of your own credentials. Mine, degree in Physics and IT, worked for four years in the Aerospace industry.
You?