crazymikey said:
A pseudoskeptic refusing to think, and trying to pass of stupidity as legitimate.
If you could at all show how this is related to what you quoted....
crazymikey said:
"eye witness testimony is false" this is why it is used as evidence in a court of law practically every case? Of course this is coming from the dunce, that said press conferences are easy and cheap to hold and that reporters bring their own studio lights lol
First, as explained eyewitness testimony alone does not count much in large cases. Second, press conferences can be cheap and are held cheaply every day.
crazymikey said:
Explanation A: Atmospheric effects
You do realize what 'migratory' means... don't you? It is not atmospheric... it is birds.
crazymikey said:
Explanation B - blimps/baloons...
Like I said, I have no idea what case you are talking about, and said 'with the limited description'. I am not going to go a debunk yet ANOTHER case you presented. Your track record flat out sucks.
crazymikey said:
Gladly. In fact, many astronomers, scientists of the 19th century, prediced the speeds of these flying objects. It's called triangulation, where the approx velocity of the object can be known by the approximate distances. Calculated by a famous astronomer. Explain.
LMAO. Please give me a link of how one man triangulated an objects location and speed in the 19th century. This should be good.
crazymikey said:
Need I say more, lol. I think the subject is under the impression, that because he does not think(ever?) that no one else does.
Thanks for the personal attacks. doesn't really help your case any.
crazymikey said:
Wait, you did not answer my question. What is UFO doing shining a beam of light on Mary - before the advent of flight, heliocentric theory of gravitation and the universe, the modern UFO phenomenon, Star Trek, X files, space science. Expain.
Why is a clock melting over a tree? It's art. Ever hear the term 'light of god', see angles with wings, the devil with horns and a pitchfork, a big hand coming out of the sky, or people with halos above their head? Funny how it should suddenly represent reality when it suits your goal.
crazymikey said:
Explanation D: Debunked?
Subject thinks the 400+ witnesses have been "debunked" without actually proving it or showing it.
I showed you about 5 or 6 of the stories which have been debunked. Don't expect me to waste my time on 400 stories when the author of the site doesn't weed out the obviously false ones.
crazymikey said:
So now Persol, now that this well respected and misrepresented person, you so greatly admire, also disclosed the truth on ETI. Do you believe
No. I also never said I greatly admired him, or that that made what he said true. This is called 'argument from authority' and doesn't float well around here.
crazymikey said:
1. There is actually little evidence to suggest the speed of light is a barrier, and theoretically anti-gravity and ZPE technology open the doors to interstellar travel.
LMAO. Source please.
crazymikey said:
How, do you know, how far ETI is? If they were just 4 light years away
We can see the systems 4 light years away, and they wouldn't support our form of life.
crazymikey said:
3. How do you know what kind of technological abilities and science an advanced ETI race is capable of; Little Persol.
Actually, you will note that I specifically have said "we don't know". At the same time you have said 'this and that will lead to FTL travel'. Your claims our unsupported. My claims that we know of no way to effectively break the c barrier is supported.
crazymikey said:
Actually, you are very stupid, and I don't even have to call you it, you show it yourself.
You don't have to, but you will anyway? Could you please do the same to applying logic?
crazymikey said:
Actually, anti-gravity, mind control and particle beam weaponary, and tractors beams are out of the "blue" seeing as no one knew about them till today.
Funny. People still don't know about them. Have any non-kook sources?
crazymikey said:
Interesting you mention television; the cathode tube took 30 years to perfect - around 1930's. While the computer took 50 years to go from occupying a room 40 feet by 30 feet to 4nm by 3nm
You have no tools. How long does it take you to build a lathe? Now you have a lathe, how long does it take you to build even more complicated tools?
So please, backup the following with non-crackpot sites:
A 19th century scientist determining an object to Mach 15.
FTL travel being possible.
Sources that show anti-gravity, mind control and particle beam weaponary, and tractors beams exist.