duendy said:me)))in what way would you apply critical thinking, if i may ask?
Some examples could be looking for contradictions / inconsistency in the story and behavioral similarities to lying.
duendy said:me))YOU cant say 'I' dont know like you can yourself. ypu dont know WHAT i know. how i approach tings and what my 'i dontknow' might mean
Ahh, thought that would be the one. You are correct in that I don't know everything you do know. I am also correct when I make assertions such as "You don't know exactly what consciousness is nor how it works" strictly using deduction.
duendy said:me))))he uses logic and emotion. actually you dont have any evidence for what YOU say. as you yourself admitted. tis YO who has siad 'i dont know' the most. no?
I never saw an example of logic being used for a major part of his claims. If an example could be provided showing this it would be greatly apprciated. If I make a speculation, it doesn't mean that it isn't rooted in evidence. In fact most (if not all) my speculations are; however, the evidence isn't substantial enough to create any testable hypothesis / model any firm theory.
duendy said:me)))ahaha cause he sees the dager OF its criteria which is...err materialistic/one-sided. you reveal your not much up on mythic motifs CC. it is vital you get a hang of that, you'll learn lots about where materialistic mindset has come from!
That criteria is what reality supports. If he thinks reality is dangerous and doesn't like it then he has the option to embrace fantasy. Myth is a great testament to human psychology and to some extent the evolution of ideas. It doesn't however do jack for understanding reality... what is it, how does it work, etc.
duendy said:me))))))its not hangin out till you sees de Quincey's shit is 'cool',it is vastly URGENT to grasp that Nature IS alive and NOT an object to be explotited!!
if not him read sources he puts out
I don't know which definition of nature is used there so I can't agree or disagree. What I do know is that earth's ecosystem can be damaged and people are going to have to be alot more careful about the things they can do that affect it.
duendy said:me)))))))haha...thats EXACTLY whats been going oooon dude! god how long a got: for now to summarize--it is a linear patriarchal trajectorey throug history throughbelief is 'spirits' BEHIND, to sky gods, to 'spirit' trapped in body and Nature, to monotheism all tis not happning stricly linerarly yu understand..just trying t simplify to rejection of all that by Galileo, to mechanical science. HI!
Wow, I think you just agreed with me . I would assert that all the above is great info about human psychology and doesn't really matter towards figuring out how to ask reality questions whose answers we can understand.
duendy said:me))))no . its a catelogue of disaster, i could try be givin and kind, but i am too fukin angry with the shit. it is destroying Nature. there hS TO BE RADICAL change. yes ethics. but as i will maybe show you. Galileo's manifesto for science's mudus operandi left OUT ethics, etc...!
Like anything, it's had positive and negative results. I do agree that ethical conduct and care must be used when wielding reality in our environment.
duendy said:m)))good
More agreement? That's uncanny duendy.
Last edited: