Pathological Skepticsm.
- Thread starter btimsah
- Start date
Gustav said:
Ja. Ja Ja Ja jajajaja. What what whatwhatwhat.
Ad Homs. Ad nauseum. Ad infinitum. Ad agency. Figure it out for yourself you dolt. I haven't seen such ramblings in a long time. You Gustavio are an obfuscator extroadinaire. Can you post anything that is not a pure random ramble? Ja? Jam? Jamboree? Ja.
duendy said:
I believe you're right, but I also believe they hit some kind of bureaucratical snag.
And do you know WHY they want to be able to prescribe medicines?
Just guessing here...
Maybe because when people are doped up, they don't see as readily the flaws of the psychologist during his attempts at therapy.
Then again, it COULD undermine the profession as well: if they were happily sedated, people would be less apt to shell out $100 an hour to talk with someone who probably can't even solve his/her own problems!
Goddamn psychos.
Far far better
Registered Member
I can't help myself. I feel compelled to post:
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/adamsandler/thehypnotist.html
http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/adamsandler/thehypnotist.html
Ha!
Giambattista said:I believe you're right, but I also believe they hit some kind of bureaucratical snag.
And do you know WHY they want to be able to prescribe medicines?
Just guessing here...
Maybe because when people are doped up, they don't see as readily the flaws of the psychologist during his attempts at therapy.
me)))i would say same as motivates the shrinks.....MONEY&POWER---lots of it. tho they'd never admi it, or admit to be in 'DENIAL'. whoa no. it'd be, 'cause we want to heeeelp you'......themost evil words you can hear come from a human's lips!!
Then again, it COULD undermine the profession as well: if they were happily sedated, people would be less apt to shell out $100 an hour to talk with someone who probably can't even solve his/her own problems!
yeah but i think they'd top that figure, but i know what you mean
but of course since these folks appear to be the mighty jamesr's ideological bedmates, the ad homs will be allowed to stand while any responses would be characterized as bait and punished severely
oh well
with so many injustices perpetrated around the world, why should sciforums be exempt.
perpetrate away, mighty ones!
/cackle
oh well
with so many injustices perpetrated around the world, why should sciforums be exempt.
perpetrate away, mighty ones!
/cackle
Ophiolite said:
now
it appears that ophiolite is insisting that the absence of contradiction would negate or impede the progress of all the factors mentioned. lets take them in order presented and infer implications.....
*a hypothesis or theory must have internal contradictions in order to be valid
*input/output, positive/negative and other such values and specs can be indiscriminately applied and yet not affect outcome.
*we understand that we simultaneously exist and dont exist at the same time
*hypocrisy is what defines us
*this is the only one that comes close to having some validity as it can be given a philosophical treatment tho is quite irrelevant since we would typically be concerned only about deductive and empirical methodology in this particular forum
sad, misguided and a rather imbecilic opinion
this is might seem like life101 but i guess i must spell it out
all of our serious endeavors are about ironing out contradictions
let us see how....
a) The first is formal, a testing of the internal consistency of the theoretical system to see if it involves any contradictions.
(b) The second step is semi-formal, the axiomatising of the theory to distinguish between its empirical and its logical elements. In performing this step the scientist makes the logical form of the theory explicit. Failure to do this can lead to category-mistakes - the scientist ends up asking the wrong questions, and searches for empirical data where none are available. Most scientific theories contain analytic (i.e. a priori) and synthetic elements, and it is necessary to axiomatise them in order to distinguish the two clearly...... (popper)
we do not celebrate contradictions as ophiolite does and perhaps would like you to do as well. on the contrary, if i may be as florid as ophiolite; contradictions are the bane of existence.
now it is worthwhile to note the context in which such an absurd affirmation on the vitality of contradiction was put forth.....
Ophiolite said:
i like broccoli on weekends only. define that
as battista so perceptively analysed...
Giambattista said:
Ophiolite
Valued Senior Member
Of course they are you thick twat. And as a consequence they are, exactly as I said, the life blood of science; the motor of invention;. and the seat of understanding. You are slow, but you finally made the connection. Hallelujah, brother. Now go play with the younger children: your sort is superfluous here.Gustav said:
If I haven't given you enough ammunition to complain to the moderators about personal attacks, just drop me a pm and I'll see what can be arranged. In the meantime learn to read and comprehend before you display your ignorance to world.
M
Mr Anonymous
Guest
And indeed at that precise time, two days ago, it did.
Am I to gather Ophiolite, apparently changing his mind in the interim between the 18th February and 19th, remains, in some undisclosed fashion, an eventuality somehow within my providence to control here, G?
Or perhaps he got the email notification from duendy's post, checked the thread, then received the email notification from Spookz's post a few hours later. Email notification bypasses the ignore feature.