Uh, oh! Some people here might say something predictable like "He's an asshole."
Or, probably, just "fraud". Removing implants is frowned upon around here. They prefer that people keep them where they are.
Only Cranks and Wierdo's See UFO's
- Thread starter Green Destiny
- Start date
Uh, oh! Some people here might say something predictable like "He's an asshole."
Or, probably, just "fraud". Removing implants is frowned upon around here. They prefer that people keep them where they are.
yet there are hundreds of pilots military and law enforcement personnel that see them also
some have multiple visual, radar contact, and personal aircraft contact yet still isnt enough if one brought an alien body people still wouldnt believe
scientists would believe. People would believe if they were given actual proof. I know I've never seen proof.
i bet you've never seen a nuclear weapon either, but you believe they exist right?
Exactly. I said this.
Pete on the other hand has a different view, and thinks one picks these things up only destortedly. I say bullshit.
Nice of you to admit it.
Sorry, couldn't let that particularly easy one pass
Tell us what you think then.
Giambattista,
Quite.
And my response to them would be; why would you say such a thing?.
And my response would be the same as my first.
My response would be; why, if the implant were put there without consent?
Then I would ask why.
jan.
Quite.
And my response to them would be; why would you say such a thing?.
And my response would be the same as my first.
My response would be; why, if the implant were put there without consent?
Then I would ask why.
jan.
really? That's the argument? If something else I have never seen exists, then aliens exist?
Yes, they proved it to themselves. They haven't proved it to me.
well, if credible evidence and testimony is given, then why wouldn't you believe it?
If credible evidence is presented, people are more likely to believe it.
Remember, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
The problem is, no credible evidence has ever been provided. That is why people don't believe it.
It's true, though. Which is why we never trust an eyewitness to describe anything.
"They're not trained observers!"
Who is?
"extraordinary" and "credible" are both relative terms.
imo nuclear weapons are pretty extraordinary. imo, the idea of humans possessing weapons like these is far more extraordinary than the idea of et's.
also, who is credible? the politicians and scientists who inform us? military personnel?
those same people have also testified to the et phenomenon.
i'm sorry, but it is clear to anyone who would take an objective look, that we choose what we believe, based in large part, by what we are willing to believe, regardless of whether it is extraordinary or credible.
"Dr. Roger Leir, author of "Aliens and the Scalpel", is one of the world’s foremost leaders in UFO physical evidence research. He is a board certified Podiatric surgeon for over 40 years and has performed with his team 14 surgeries on alleged alien abductees, resulting in the removal of 15 separate objects suspected of being alien implants. These objects have been scrutinized by some of the most prestigious laboratories in the world including Los Alamos National Labs, New Mexico Tech, and UC-San Diego. "
explain to me how this is anything but extraordinary credible evidence.