Maybe if they each kidnapped an Israeli's relative, they would have a talking point?
News From Gaza
- Thread starter S.A.M.
- Start date
- Status
Maybe if they each kidnapped an Israeli's relative, they would have a talking point?
they certainly want an israeli, but not a living one.
That would be more creditable if Israel followed a Defensive rather than a High-Kill-Ratio policy, don't your think?
whats more defensive then deporting 10000 of your own citizens? do you want us to save them the time and shoot our own citizens as well? when are you gonna criticize the palestinians for firing rockets on israel???? they are not mannikin's hey made that choice, not we!!
this was just today!!
sonic booms as a response to? :shrug:
What are sonic booms a response to?
you tell me..are the palestinians doing something israel should response to? maybe something that start with..ho i dont know , with a K? could it be???
It was NOT a defensive* move to take Israelis from Gaza. It was, as I have several times explained*, a "brilliant, simply brilliant" move by Israel - really the only way Israel could insure that the rest of the world united on the need for a Palestinian state did not try to ram one down Israel's throat. Again brilliant, simply brilliant!
---------------
*I have many times described in detail a truly DEFENSIVE option for Israel, asked you at least 10 times to tell why not try it to reduce the loss of innocent life and probable totally eliminate both the rockets and the few Israeli terrorist caused deaths that currently occur (far fewer than Israelis make with their car accidents.)
My bones are getting more brittle. - Don't make me fall out of my chair by answering this question on the 11th time it has been asked.
*In this thread, post 788 explains in detail.
Last edited by a moderator:
guys
my friend died last night in a car accident
its so sad =[
he was 14 and still so young ...
it sucks
my friend died last night in a car accident
its so sad =[
he was 14 and still so young ...
it sucks
It was NOT a defensive* move to take Israelis from Gaza. It was, as I have several times explained, a "brilliant, simply brilliant" move by Israel - really the only way Israel could insure that the rest of the world united on the need for a Palestinian state did not try to ram one down Israel's throat. Again brilliant, simply brilliant!
---------------
*I have many times described in detail a truly DEFENSIVE option for Israel, asked you at least 10 times to tell why not try it to reduce the loss of innocent life and probable totally eliminate both the rockets and the few Israeli terrorist caused deaths that currently occur (far fewer than Israelis make with their car accidents.)
My bones are getting more brittle. - Don't make me fall out of my chair by answering this question on the 11th time it has been asked.
funny every israeli here never thought of it but you have.
like the story about the guy who think everyones else is crazy and they think he is the crazy one, so because they are the majority they locked him up.
did the israelis also took in to account the dead israelis from qassam rockets? the soldier with no life signs currently in hamas possession? the war with hezbulla?? how long are you going to be a moron billy t? for how long?
i seriously think you got something going on there....
I neither think everyone else is crazy nor have I claimed my plan is perfect, free of flaws. My defensive plan probably has some flaws in it. That is why I wish you and some other Israelites would comment on the details. For at least the 12th time, I again ask:
Why not a Defensive alternative, such as mine, that would save almost all, if not all, Israeli lives and greatly reduce the number of innocent Palestinians now killed with the chosen High Kill Ratio Retaliatory plan, which needs a few Israelis to die to justify it?
For the benefit of new readers, here is a link to my long ago suggested plan:
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1124159&postcount=115
Plan is not perfect, but does seem to have a chance to at least reduce the number of Israelis killed. Why not try to save ALL Israelis from the terrorist?
Also for those who will not bother to read my plan:
Please do not falsely assume I am against killing some Palestinians. The Plan calls for "shredding all living life at the Gaza rocket launch sites" with automatic counter battery artillery fire (about 6 shells, usually) in less than a minute after the first rocket is launched - it shows how this is easily done with 40 year old technology even.
PS the above link is not to the original suggestion, but a revision made about a year later which is more clear and concise. (Presented in specific steps.)
Last edited by a moderator:
Why the Gaza pull out was "Brilliant, Simply Brilliant" was already explained in post 788.
Ok now for the 13th time, can I have an answer to my very direct questrion?
it wasnt brilliant it was stupid. it costs us in 10000 outcasts, dozens of dead and a lot of suffering children and probably a war with HAMAS.
how dumb can you be?
One of the dumbest things the world has seen in the last 60 years was the creation of a Jewish apartheid state, in the middle of a nascent Palestinian state. I mean look what's happened.
It was a bad idea when the bit of paper got signed, it was a bad idea to believe that a Western-style democratic state could be "created" more or less overnight, and it's still a bad idea.
A country does not get "created", by signing a bit of paper.
Europe was in a hurry to shift the Jewish problem elsewhere; the Arab world was, at the time, viewed as not having any option or any say in the "creation" of a modern state, on its backdoor, for the benefit (solely) of Jews and those European countries who wouldn't have to deal with all the postwar European Jewish refugees. Arab refugees don't count, apparently.
So the holocaust is still going - Jews believe they are fighting for the survival of their nation and their people, just like Hitler wanted Germans to believe they had to do--find some "living room", by taking it off other people who aren't German--they can take it off people who aren't Jewish, because only Jews, and their homeland, are important.
It was a bad idea when the bit of paper got signed, it was a bad idea to believe that a Western-style democratic state could be "created" more or less overnight, and it's still a bad idea.
A country does not get "created", by signing a bit of paper.
Europe was in a hurry to shift the Jewish problem elsewhere; the Arab world was, at the time, viewed as not having any option or any say in the "creation" of a modern state, on its backdoor, for the benefit (solely) of Jews and those European countries who wouldn't have to deal with all the postwar European Jewish refugees. Arab refugees don't count, apparently.
So the holocaust is still going - Jews believe they are fighting for the survival of their nation and their people, just like Hitler wanted Germans to believe they had to do--find some "living room", by taking it off other people who aren't German--they can take it off people who aren't Jewish, because only Jews, and their homeland, are important.
Last edited:
exactly, the Jews are creating Holocaust for the Palestinians, except the books probably will not be reading it as a "Holocaust" more like the awesome freedom fighters of Israel have blah blah....basically lies.
they said the same on Czechoslovakia.
- Status