piglet1946 said:Actually Jenyar, I personally would. Can't speak for Marlin or any other Mormon, but someone deciding to be a Christian -- even in a different church-house -- is still something to rejoice about.
Of course I'd rather see them join my church -- most people would -- but I've already explained to you how I feel about Christ and his teachings (a couple of posts ago; hope you read it). If someone decides to embrace them, why would I not be happy? I'm not going to let something like my personal beliefs stop them from getting to know Him just for the sake of going to my church. I would truly be happy for him, because letting Christ into your life -- even in a different church than mine -- still effects a change for the better.
Latter-day Saints believe that the purpose of life is to obtain the fullness of salvation by becoming like God and living as he lives (See Godhood). We call this state of existence eternal life or exaltation. To obtain this ultimate degree of salvation, it is necessary to "obey the laws and ordinances of the gospel." (Third Article of Faith) These laws and ordinances are taught in their fulness only by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Here are just a few examples -- faith in Jesus; repentance; baptism by immersion; gift of the Holy Ghost; gifts of the spirit; oath and covenant of the priesthood; eternal marriage; Sabbath keeping; Word of Wisdom; and law of consecration. While many Christian Churches teach portions of the gospel, we alone offer all the knowledge necessary to become Christlike and receive the fullness of salvation. As President Hinckley recently said:
"We, in effect, simply say to others, 'Bring all the good that you have and let us see if we can add to it'" ("The BYU Experience," BYU devotional address, 4 Nov. 1997).
Marlin said:Why Should I Convert?
Latter-day Saints believe that the purpose of life is to obtain the fullness of salvation by becoming like God and living as he lives (See Godhood).
We call this state of existence eternal life or exaltation. To obtain this ultimate degree of salvation, it is necessary to "obey the laws and ordinances of the gospel." (Third Article of Faith) These laws and ordinances are taught in their fulness only by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Here are just a few examples -- faith in Jesus; repentance; baptism by immersion; gift of the Holy Ghost; gifts of the spirit; oath and covenant of the priesthood; eternal marriage; Sabbath keeping; Word of Wisdom; and law of consecration. While many Christian Churches teach portions of the gospel, we alone offer all the knowledge necessary to become Christlike and receive the fullness of salvation. As President Hinckley recently said:
"We, in effect, simply say to others, 'Bring all the good that you have and let us see if we can add to it'" ("The BYU Experience," BYU devotional address, 4 Nov. 1997).
Only Latter-day Saints have Priesthood authority, or the authority to act in God's name and perform His saving ordinances (such as baptism and marriage for time and eternity). This, among other things, is why we try to convert others, because the ordinances necessary for exaltation are found only in our church.
water said:You first have to explain to a person why they should be after what you offer.
It is far from obvious, you know.
Why should I believe you? The Moroni promise test doesn't work.
How am I to know that you indeed have such authority?
And I'm asking again, for I don't know which time:
Eternal marriage. If a man marries a widow, whom will he be married to in heaven? What if a widower re-marries?
And what makes any couple sure that they will BOTH make it to heaven?
Marlin said:If you desire to have eternal life, you need to have the saving ordinances performed for you by someone who has the proper Priesthood authority.
Yes, it does work. Perhaps you just haven't recognized God's answer to you as such.
Ask God in pure faith (see James 1:5, 6) and He will answer you.
A man may have more than one woman sealed to him through eternity; however, a woman may only have one eternal husband.
And I suppose that if you don't both make it to heaven, another person will be made available to you (speculation).
Marlin said:If you desire to have eternal life, you need to have the saving ordinances performed for you by someone who has the proper Priesthood authority.
A person can be baptized into Jesus' name by anyone who has himself been baptised, and it's not just the Mormon church who performs this sacrament. That's why Christianity survives, despite this Apostasy, which you said you didn't know much about (and that Mormon authorities themselves can only speculate about). The thief on the cross was promised salvation without being baptised, so it's evident that it's still God who saves - not the baptism, or the one administering it.Marlin said:Jenyar, Priesthood authority is necessary for baptism to be efficacious, and Jesus made it clear that baptism is an essential ordinance for salvation...
You have yet to show me where Peter, James and John received any priesthood authority - let alone an authority only Christ qualifies for - remember? Simply saying they did does not mean they in fact did.Mormons believe and teach that the line of Priesthood authority has to be unbroken between the Priesthood bearer and Christ; thus, because the Great Apostasy happened in which Priesthood authority was lost from the earth, it had to be restored to the earth. This restoration happened through the Prophet Joseph Smith, who received the Melchizedek Priesthood directly from Peter, James, and John, who received it from Christ Himself. This is our teaching and our understanding.
Jenyar said:A person can be baptized into Jesus' name by anyone who has himself been baptised, and it's not just the Mormon church who performs this sacrament. That's why Christianity survives, despite this Apostasy, which you said you didn't know much about (and that Mormon authorities themselves can only speculate about).
The thief on the cross was promised salvation without being baptised, so it's evident that it's still God who saves - not the baptism, or the one administering it.
You have yet to show me where Peter, James and John received any priesthood authority - let alone an authority only Christ qualifies for - remember? Simply saying they did does not mean they in fact did.
That aside, if Peter, Paul, Timothy or any of their flock could lose an authority that came simply by virtue of it being given, how are you so certain Joseph Smith or Mormons haven't lost it themselves? Do you assume that the apostles and their disciples all died without having passed on this incredible authority - something so extremely important that the whole fate of the world and the salvation Christ attained depended on its unbroken continuation?
Melchizedek is only mentioned twice in the Bible, once in the Hebrew scriptures, and once in Hebrews. The Hebrews never practiced or carried on this priesthood, and barely mentioned it. Do you think it was unbroken between Melchizedek and Christ as well?
Jadon, Revelation is rather clear there will be at least two other prophets and Paul speaks of other prophets in the Christian community. I think it's clear, too, that there will be some prophets who will make predictions but no drastically different revelation will be given to Christians.Didn't The Messiah himself say that after him there would be no other? Hi's words and the words of his Disciples and Apostle Paul are clear. Until the Second Coming, there shall be no other Prophet. To state that there are other prophets after Christ is Blasphemy!!!
Marlin, Paul said that it doesn't really matter who baptizes. He was trying to qualm disputes as to whether it mattered whether he baptized someone or someone else. His writing therefore shows that priests don't necessarily have to do the baptism.This is false doctrine. Priesthood authority is necessary for baptism to be recognized by God; you haven't proved otherwise by any scriptural reference; you've only stated your own unfounded doctrine.
OK, if you're to make claims to a great apostacy, you're going to have to show when this occurred and why. Basically, where is the evidence? The Romans persecuted Christians who believed in one God. Why would people who believed in mormon beliefs be forced into believing the Trinity?Joseph Smith et al did have the authority; this is my faith and my testimony to the world. The Great Apostasy did happen; this is also my testimony. God told me in my heart that Joseph Smith was a true prophet of God, and that the gospel he restored is true.
eh? that’s awful presumptuous, authority from who? Joe Smith the money-digger? thou must be kidding, art thou not? the LDS only has authority over those that it ensnares, it’s a cult, it has no God-given authority, only man-givenMarlin said:Why Should I Convert?
Only Latter-day Saints have Priesthood authority, or the authority to act in God's name and perform His saving ordinances (such as baptism and marriage for time and eternity).
you mean the copy-cat secret Masonic rites? the ones Joe Smith installed, soon after being initiated into the Masons, check Fawn Brodie's, "No man knows my history", it’s a mighty tome, about 10 pounds worth of infoThis, among other things, is why we try to convert others, because the ordinances necessary for exaltation are found only in our church.
Jadon said:Didn't The Messiah himself say that after him there would be no other? Hi's words and the words of his Disciples and Apostle Paul are clear. Until the Second Coming, there shall be no other Prophet. To state that there are other prophets after Christ is Blasphemy!!!
okinrus said:
Marlin, Paul said that it doesn't really matter who baptizes. He was trying to qualm disputes as to whether it mattered whether he baptized someone or someone else. His writing therefore shows that priests don't necessarily have to do the baptism.
OK, if you're to make claims to a great apostacy, you're going to have to show when this occurred and why. Basically, where is the evidence? The Romans persecuted Christians who believed in one God. Why would people who believed in mormon beliefs be forced into believing the Trinity?
"Apostle" means "sent one", and that doesn't mean they were prophets of God - although they might still be called "prophets of Christ" (because they were spreading his gospel). See Do We Still Have Apostles?Marlin said:If there were to be no other prophets after Christ, how do you explain the existence of the apostles? They existed after He died, and they received revelations from God through the Holy Spirit. What Jesus meant was, there would be no other Messiah after Him.