Masturbation is for Losers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think the point you keep missing, although I have now explained it some dozen times, is that when people converse, (and in the case of some of your pictures - to an audience), they will naturally lean forward.. whether they're a mass wanker or not.

What you need to do is show how the examples featured on your photos are a sign of mass masturbation. 41 pages have passed and you still haven't managed to give reasons. You have told all us lying scientists, lying teachers, lying politicians, lying children and lying whoever else that the human body is like a hard boiled egg or the energiser bunny, but you still have not shown anything to corroborate a link between masturbation and leaning forward when talking to a crowd of people.

Another problem arises with the fact that all of these people do generally have straight heads/necks.

We can see, by looking at any one of a 1000 other pictures that Bill Gate's head and neck are straight and his eyes are the same size. If he was 'damaged', surely that damage wouldn't just vanish one moment and be there the next? When you have a broken leg it isn't just unbroken one minute, broken the next and then unbroken again.. If it was, as you claim, damage - then they would remain in the same position all the time. Your claim falls flat on it's face the minute someone you accuse of being a damaged mass masturbator holds his head straight.

You have demonstrated quite clearly for all of us that you have zero understanding of the human form. We might be fibres and hard boiled on the inside, but you show absolutely no knowledge of humans on the outside. Although I will certainly give you points for effort, you do need to apply a little more education before we get anywhere.

I remember having already said this to you some 20 pages ago, but like always you take it as an attack and start insulting people. It might aswell be known that you have provided more insults to more people than probably any other post in the history of this forum - all the while trying to make out that you're the victim.

I might aswell point out that not one person here is 'frightened'. If you haven't managed to provide anything over 41 pages, the chances are you never will.

My grandpappy used to tell me he could pick the good cows from the bad cows.

While nobody will dispute that you can adequately tell an ill cow from a healthy one, you wouldn't claim it was from masturbation, and if you did you would need to back it up with something substantial. Ok, for the sake of argument let's say that Gates and all these other people are extremely ill. Their heads tilt occasionally because there's something wrong with them, their eyes differ in size and their noses are wonky. Now... please provide the scientific link between these problems and their penises. As I stated to you around 20 pages ago, you cannot use photo's in this instance - because a photo cannot in any way provide a source for their problems. You could show us all 1,000,000 photos of black people, but you cannot extrapolate from there that they all turned black from picking their noses without providing some evidence that there is a link between them.

You really have mistaken every poster in this thread. Ok, we have heard you 50 gazillion times.. These photos show damaged people. We will all assume for a minute that they truly are, (even though the evidence is actually against you). Now you need to provide the link between masturbation and these problems that you see. Let it be said that we do not see the symptoms you describe. In the case of John Spencer, yes.. he did suffer from a droppy right eyelid. Science has already established causes of that, (ptosis), and not one of them is masturbation. So, science is wrong. You now need to show why. You need to establish the link between masturbation and ptosis, just like scientists established the links between diabetes and ptosis, (as example). This can be achieved relatively simply: Get 5,000 diabetics and see what percentage suffer from ptosis. Let's say 80% of them do. That would be a pretty clear indication that ptosis and diabetes have some link. You would then do many further tests to establish the facts. You have done none of these so I can only ask why you are here making claims. It is pointless and futile to any true scientists.

You have made quite a few mistakes in your original conclusions:

A) You have mistaken a tilted head as a sign of 'damage'. A tilted head is entirely natural for every single human being on this planet at certain times. If you can show me people with permanently tilted heads then we can work from there.

B) You have mistaken leaning forward as a sign of 'damage. Leaning forward is entirely natural for every single human being on this planet at certain times, (especially when talking to an audience). If you can show me people permanently leaning forward then we can work from there.

C) You have mistaken a few of the people on your photos of having a 'small nub' as an ear. What you obviously are not in-tune with is how a camera works. Anyone leaning in a certain direction will have one ear that looks like a 'nub'.. it's all about angles.. I would suggest further time in mathematics class.

There are more but that will suffice for now.

I might aswell mention that I had a secret meeting with every forum member who has posted here. We sat down together and came to the conclusion that you're right... all the people in your photos are seriously ill, seriously damaged. We have all signed an agreement on this - yes, these people are damaged.

Now all we await is for you to give us the link between masturbation and these symptoms. Kindly show how you have established that these symptoms have arisen from over masturbation.

Thnx.
 
SnakeLord said:
I might aswell mention that I had a secret meeting with every forum member who has posted here. We sat down together and came to the conclusion that you're right... all the people in your photos are seriously ill, seriously damaged.
I meant to ask you at the time. What was that wine you served? The red burgundy. Very palatable.
 
Snakelord, your patience is commandable. In our meeting I kept on telling the croud, this guy is an idiot, even though he writes well, but he's just a tad too full of himself, with an overinflated self indulged false ego, a notion that if one does not agree with his pseudo theory of masturbation, then one is ingnorant of life, and how to live, it. His paranoia of Zionist Jews sounds like another Nazi in the making, he has lost a sense of reality, and now preaches and dribles over his keyboard drooling with the attention that we all have given him. He lives for this shit. Anyhow pardon me for spilling the wine, had a tad too much vodka before I made it there, I've got fear of flying you know!. LOL.. ;) And probably made myself look like an ass, as I kept on saying Idiot, idiot, idiot, over and over again when it came to this Happeh character.

Godless
 
Look, fellows, I know that I did not have any posts in this thread and therefore was automatically rejected for the conference, but can some one please send me the proceedings, thank you very much.

How I possibly can help to maintain a global conspiracy with you guys, I just don't know...
 
I meant to ask you at the time. What was that wine you served? The red burgundy. Very palatable.

Actually you'd be interested to know it was a shiraz, (Jacob's Creek). I have a great like for red wine, but even more so for Australian red wine.

In our meeting I kept on telling the croud, this guy is an idiot, even though he writes well, but he's just a tad too full of himself, with an overinflated self indulged false ego

I would, in honesty, consider myself as a man with an ability to write. I suppose education plays it's part, but I have always been able to write rather well, (as I see it). However, it need be said that the ability to write is not an indication of intelligence, or knowing that people who masturbate too much shall go blind. I am more than willing to overlook the issues with the first part of Happeh's claims if only he would provide the connection between symptoms and the art of fiddling with your penis. I do indeed remember asking him some 20 pages ago. The problem here is that if I vanish, Happeh will even more so consider himself right, and even more so consider the people of science as a bunch of liars. I have a duty that extends beyond that - but must confess that even I am being pushed beyond limits. It's an odd sensation, because on the one hand I want to actually be of help, but on the other I am finding it difficult to believe that people this naive actually exist. Still, I am already aware that he will take my polite post and use it to insult me some and call me a 'hater'. After a while you get used to the methods that are employed to try and 'win' a debate. And it needs be said that it is all about 'winning', he has, after all, brought it up a good 20 times. To him it is a competition, to us it is simple normality. We ask for evidence, we ask for details.. These are foreign things to Happeh. He will 'win' this argument by accusation and nothing more. We all know that.

Of course he doesn't know who he's dealing with. If this goes 50,000 pages then so be it. I must confess, I do like a challenge. Where he lacks in reality he certainly makes up for in persistence. I have decided right now that I shall go the distance, even if I am talking to myself for the majority of it. The fact of the matter is that Happeh 'lost' this argument around 300 posts ago, and so the only thing now is to watch him burn off his energy. It will come.. it always does. I can only wonder if Happeh has the strength of his own convictions to go the distance. Time will tell.
 
Last edited:
SnakeLord said:
I think the point you keep missing, although I have now explained it some dozen times, is that when people converse, (and in the case of some of your pictures - to an audience), they will naturally lean forward.. whether they're a mass wanker or not.

100% of the time. All of the time?

You are wrong. You know people that are not healthy. People who are lazy or have bad posture or are sick.

You don't know the first thing about science. WHY do they lean forward? "Because they are talking to people" is not a scientific reason.

SnakeLord said:
What you need to do is show how the examples featured on your photos are a sign of mass masturbation. 41 pages have passed and you still haven't managed to give reasons. You have told all us lying scientists, lying teachers, lying politicians, lying children and lying whoever else that the human body is like a hard boiled egg or the energiser bunny, but you still have not shown anything to corroborate a link between masturbation and leaning forward when talking to a crowd of people.

There is nothing I enjoy more than kicking a person saying he is intelligent, but is really just a buffoon. You are clueless Snake. You refuse to accept my authority. Now you are gonna look stupid.

The picture below is of two publicly declared homosexual men. Homosexual men are known for their frequent sexual activity.

HomosSmallModified.jpg


On the left, the man's head is clearly, even to a buffoon like you, not centered on his neck. Clearly, even to someone as blind as you, his neck is hanging off to the right side of the picture.

On the right, the man clearly has a closed right eye. Even to someone as unobservant as you, his eye is clearly, undeniably, unequivocalby closed. Even someone who is a blatant liar like you cannot deny the man has his hands thrust into his pants close to his genitals.

Now, U snake, this is where you say "just because homosexuals are known for frequent sex, and these two men are in a newspaper advertising themselves as homosexuals, that is not proof they masturbate or have sex alot".

Can you hear exactly how desperate you are getting? You are reaching so far that when you finally fall, the thud will be heard around the forums.

Happeh Victorious, Snake slithering back to the hole he crawled out of.
 
SnakeLord said:
Of course he doesn't know who he's dealing with.

Sure I do. Satan in human forum

A lying, deceitful, woman abusing hater who uses his psychology training to attack defenseless people who know nothing about psychology. He does this because, as a disciple of Satan, he feeds off of the suffering of others. If everyone is happy, Snakelord goes hungry.

It is not a coincidence a man named Snakelord is doing battle with a man named Happeh.

It is a metaphor for good vs evil, God vs Satan.

Think about it. Do you really want to ally yourself with snakes and Satan instead of Happeh and God?
 
Happeh said:
. Do you really want to ally yourself with snakes and Satan instead of Happeh and God?
Ophiolite - a suite of rocks originating at mid ocean ridges and subsequently accreted onto continental crust. From the Greek, ophis, a snake.

We've been here all the time Happeh. Waiting. Just waiting.
 
Cris

Yes I think I'll follow. I began a lengthy psycho-analysis but I don't think posting such a critique of another member is in the spirit of these forums. I'll simply remain silent.

You're right, it wouldn't be in the spirit of these forums, but I suspect it would be an interesting read nonetheless.

My neck is getting sore from all the head shaking I'm doing each time I read Happehs posts. As a result, my head is starting to tilt to one side. Perhaps Happehs' theory on 'tilted heads/masturbation' could be revised to include that.
 
100% of the time. All of the time?

the majority of the time, yes. I am 'trained' Happeh, you are untrained. If you spent some time listening you'd realise that what I say is powerful.

All sarcasm aside, the majority of the time people are conversing, (especially with an audience in front of them), they will lean forward.

However, it is of no conseuqence. If you had bothered paying attention to my post, (instead of taking it as another opportunity to throw off some more pointless insults), you'd see that the only thing that is of any worth right now is something that links masturbation to the symptoms you describe.

You are wrong. You know people that are not healthy. People who are lazy or have bad posture or are sick.

As stated above, it is of no consequence. I have already, for the sake of argument, agreed with the symptoms you have pointed out. Yes, they're all seriously ill. Now all you need to do is show the link between those symptoms and masturbation.

I hereby promise to pay Happeh £1,000,000 if he can show the link between masturbation and the symptoms he has described.

*T&C Saying the human body looks like spaghetti and all scientists are wrong is not considered as a "link", nor are photographs or any personal opinion offered by Happeh. Money will be paid out at £100,000 per month for ten months.

Well Happeh.. I have just offered you £1 million. That, judging from prior posts, is all you care about. I can pay the money, can you fulfill the request?

You don't know the first thing about science.

I beg to differ, and I am willing to lay it all on the line.

I hereby promise to pay Happeh £1,000,000 if he can show in front of a board of scientists that he knows more science than I do.

That's now £2 million I have offered you. The question is: Do you have the balls?

WHY do they lean forward?

It is a sign that they are being genuine, or forthright about their story. It might not be true, but they certainly believe it to be. In my estimation you would lean forward if telling an audience about the harm of masturbation.

There is nothing I enjoy more than kicking a person saying he is intelligent

So, I ask you to provide a link between masturbation and the symptoms you have shown - as politely as possible, and this is the best you come up with? It might be worth mentioning that nowhere in my quote did I claim myself as intelligent. You are either lying or blind. Let's get this straight:

I hereby promise to pay Happeh £1,000,000 if he can show the link between masturbation and the symptoms he has described.

*T&C shown earlier.

Please, do not attempt to insult my integrity by diverting this discussion into areas irrelevant to the topic. I have now offered you £1 million. Will you take it?

but is really just a buffoon.

Your insults are quite sweet, but utterly irrelevant. Admittedly I hadn't offered you £1 million before now so there was no reason for you to act like a grown up. Now there hopefully is.

You are clueless Snake.

Insult number 2, just as irrelevant as the first. Try again.

You refuse to accept my authority.

Well, I have just offered you £1 million to show your authority. I have this feeling that all of a sudden money will become meaningless to you.

Homosexual men are known for their frequent sexual activity.

They are? I'm sorry, perhaps it's just the infrequent amount of time I spend with homosexuals, but I have never known them to be more frequent in their sexual activity than heterosexuals. Please justify your claim. Having said all that, it was you yourself that said masturbation was the cause of these symptoms due to "the hand not entirely covering the penis", so why bring the sexual activity of homosexuals into the discussion?

even to a buffoon like you

Insult number 3. You know these are becoming really quite tiresome. Even worse is the fact that you go on to call me evil and a worker of satan when I haven't insulted you once here.

On the left, the man's head is clearly, even to a buffoon like you, not centered on his neck.

That is a sexual pose, designed to allure customers. It is very rare that you will find a photograph showing someone with a fully straight head and neck and perfectly open eyes. Indeed the only example I can think of is a photoshoot just before you get locked in a cell. You will recognise those photos because the 'model' will be holding a number.

The second photo is quite rare given the above, but then seeings as he doesn't have the 'boyish good looks' of the first guy, it seems he is taking the 'dominant' approach. The mouth is curled in a 'mean' fashion, (much like a snarling dog), he is totally straight with the arms in an almost military stance, and he is looking straight at the camera - the 'wink', (and that's all it is Happeh), works to counter-affect that dominance. Although he is a 'hard ass', he is still available.

Trust me Happeh, I am 'trained', you are not. Once you start to understand about the human body, (external), you will start to realise the worthlessness of your claims.

Clearly, even to someone as blind as you

Insult number 4. Must we play these silly games Happeh?

Even to someone as unobservant as you

Insult number 5. Going for a record? (and all of this from a polite post telling you to support your claims - and indeed agreeing with the symptoms you described).

On the right, the man clearly has a closed right eye. Even to someone as unobservant as you, his eye is clearly, undeniably, unequivocalby closed.

Humans call them 'winks'.

Even someone who is a blatant liar like you

Insult number 6. Do you see what I mentioned on my last post about you calling everyone a liar? I asked for a link between masturbation and the symptoms, I didn't deny the symptoms you described. Why must I face a barrage of insults for agreeing with you?

cannot deny the man has his hands thrust into his pants close to his genitals.

I wonder where else he would put them, (given his obvious job and the function of the photograph). Think Happeh, think.

Now, U snake, this is where you say "just because homosexuals are known for frequent sex..

See Happeh, didn't I always tell you karma looks out for me? There's the thing, I wouldn't say what you have quoted, only someone untrained in the art of understanding human beings would say such a thing. Nobody with any training would ever claim that "homosexuals are known for frequent sex", unless they had either:

A) Been around lots of homosexuals, (in which case I will happily view the evidence to support your claim).

or B) Done a study to show the differences of sexual activity between heterosexuals and homosexuals.

I have had the opportunity to speak to several homosexuals in my lifetime, and from what I could tell they didn't have sex any more than any heterosexual.

Can you hear exactly how desperate you are getting?

Actually no, Happeh, and I will tell you why: I never said it, you did. What should we conclude from this excercise? That you are desperate, and so much so that you'd start making up my responses for me?

But hey, while we're on the subject I will admit that I am desperate.. desperate for you to prove me wrong and earn £1 million. Take the opportunity Happeh, if you can.

Happeh Victorious, Snake slithering back to the hole he crawled out of.

This is what I always found most amusing about you.

A) You consider this some sort of competition, and

B) You always seem to consider yourself the victor before allowing anyone else to respond. The last time you did this you left a 4 minute gap between your normal post and self-congratulation post.

However, I have now offered you £1 million, so hopefully you will double your efforts and provide what every person on this forum wants. Once you have done so, I shall be poor and you can congratulate yourself to your hearts content.

A lying, deceitful, woman abusing hater who uses his psychology training to attack defenseless people who know nothing about psychology.

Pay attention: This has nothing to do with psychology, but reality. I have offered you £1 million to take that step between fantasy and reality. Only you can do so, and I urge you to make the move. Ok, I am a bit dissuaded by the threat of losing my life's savings, but I am willing to make that gamble right now, (being a man of science).

If everyone is happy, Snakelord goes hungry.

Let's assume that you, Happeh, are made happy by taking my £1 million. I can guarantee you that there will still be millions of unhappy people for me to abuse.

It is not a coincidence a man named Snakelord is doing battle with a man named Happeh.

While it is entirely irrelevant to anything that featured on my last post, you are welcome to it. You can call me any names you want, you can defame my nickname to your hearts content AND you can earn £1 million while doing so. Dare you take it?
 
Lori 7
Why did you masturbate at all? Why did you wait for your man to get you :eek: I'm wondering, were you horny at all ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Happeh said:
Are you offended? You are a child. It is fact. The teachers do lie, purposefully or unknowingly.
.....And yes. I am right and everybody else is wrong. What can I do? I tell them to their faces they are wrong. I tell them all they need to do to prove I am right is use the same instruction sheet for an experiment that they were handed in 9th grade chemistry. Observe and extrapolate.

Happeh, you've claimed that fairies, dragons, and elves were once real, because stories are written about them.
You've claimed the human body has an energy force around it like a hula hooop that is like a force field from star trek enterprise - that it stops people bumping into each other (as opposed to them just not wanting to bump - and despite the fact that blind people do it all the time).
You find photos of people tilting their heads (who probably tilt their heads no more than normal people), and make wild generalisations based on a single photo. The lines you have drawn on photos of people are ridiculous.
I bet if you went through photos of yourself, you would find some photos of your head tilting sometimes.
You slander homosexuals, and people who masturbate, because you have some kind of hangup/insecurity about sexual activity.

So who is behaving more childish? Keep on playing your age game, as a cover up for who is really being immature. Elves and fairies and dragons. You make borat laugh.



Now on the other hand, your political claims I agree with.

Happeh said:
Especially when they see the proof of my claims every day. No WMD in Iraq. Bush spying on people outside of the law. CEO's stealing money from Enron or Worldcom. Every day there is a headline that says "Authority is a bunch of lying stealing crooks". They can ignore all of that if they can just shut me up.

Actually, I also believe all of these claims. I've read enough about them myself to be confident they are true.
I also believe there was a conspiracy behind 9/11 to either let it happen or make it happen. There is evidence for all of these political claims, motive for these politicians, and undeniable holes in "official" stories.
THe project for a new american century ARE evil.



But your other theories about people are outrageous, and are a result of your pervasive paranoia and narcissism.

Who is the child? Really. I appreciate having a wild imagination, but this is just delusional. Your magical thinking is ridiculous, especially at your "age".


"magical thinking: A conviction that thinking equates with doing. Occurs in dreams in children, in primitive peoples, and in patients under a variety of conditions. Characterized by lack of realistic relationship between cause and effect. "

"paranoid ideation:
Ideation, of less than delusional proportions, involving suspiciousness or the belief that one is being harassed, persecuted, or unfairly treated. "

"delusion:
A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everyone else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture (e.g., it is not an article of religious faith). When a false belief involves a value judgment, it is regarded as a delusion only when the judgment is so extreme as to defy credibility.
... Delusions are subdivided according to their content. Some of the more common types are: bizarre; delusional jealousy; grandiose; delusion of reference; persecutory; somatic; thought broadcasting; thought insertion. "

from http://www.abess.com/glossary.html

(I think the term "thought broadcasting" refers to "telepathy")
 
Me and my GF think it's a good idea to wait until we're married to have sex, but to relieve sexual tension we both masturbate. There's nothing wrong with it, and it's feels good too.
 
SnakeLord said:
As stated above, it is of no consequence. I have already, for the sake of argument, agreed with the symptoms you have pointed out. Yes, they're all seriously ill. Now all you need to do is show the link between those symptoms and masturbation.

I hereby promise to pay Happeh £1,000,000 if he can show the link between masturbation and the symptoms he has described.

*T&C Saying the human body looks like spaghetti and all scientists are wrong is not considered as a "link", nor are photographs or any personal opinion offered by Happeh. Money will be paid out at £100,000 per month for ten months.

Well Happeh.. I have just offered you £1 million. That, judging from prior posts, is all you care about. I can pay the money, can you fulfill the request?


You say you can pay the money. How do I know for sure?

You son of a gun. I own you. I want that money now. You just said in front of everyone you would give it to me.

How much is that worth in dollars? I am going house hunting.

Do we have any lawyers here? Is what he said a binding contract? I took a picture of his post before he smartens up and erases it.
 
SnakeLord said:
I beg to differ, and I am willing to lay it all on the line.

I hereby promise to pay Happeh £1,000,000 if he can show in front of a board of scientists that he knows more science than I do.

That's now £2 million I have offered you. The question is: Do you have the balls?

God. I knew you were stupid, but holy moly! Now I can buy two houses and a vacation home.

Here is the deal. You pick who you want to be there. You pick the location. Since you are the money bags, you pay for me to get to whereever it is the test is.

Now. How do we decide what proof is? I know what proof is. You would say the sky is green if it suited you.

I propose we find some independent observers, or we both agree that the people you bring are on the up and up. No ringers or shills voting your way.
Maybe I get the right to bring someone with me.

All the sciforums members are witnesses to this incredibly foolish offer you just made to me. I know you like to think you are a man of your word. Now is your chance to prove it.

I hope you will not go into the poor house paying me. I will have no mercy at all. If you start crying about how you can't afford to pay, that is too bad. I want the money. I will also enjoy seeing you cry.

And oh ya. You must bring the money with you to the test. I want to leave the meeting with the money in my hands. 20 or 100 dollar bills will be fine.


EDIT: Oh. I just read this more closely. I don't care if Snake can convince a board he knows more science. All I care about is my theory. Besides, I am not greedy. 1 million is plenty for me. I don't need 2 million.
 
Last edited:
SnakeLord said:
They are? I'm sorry, perhaps it's just the infrequent amount of time I spend with homosexuals, but I have never known them to be more frequent in their sexual activity than heterosexuals.

I said in my post that you would do this.

SnakeLord said:
Trust me Happeh, I am 'trained', you are not. Once you start to understand about the human body, (external), you will start to realise the worthlessness of your claims.

You know what? I dislike you so much, I am going to take a picture of myself everyday, spending your money somewhere. Then I am going to mail you a thank you card with the picture. Every day. You will remember every time you open the mail that you were totally owned by a nobody.


SnakeLord said:
See Happeh, didn't I always tell you karma looks out for me?

Yes, yes. Typical psychologist ploy. Use the targets words and phrases against them.


SnakeLord said:
Actually no, Happeh, and I will tell you why: I never said it, you did. What should we conclude from this excercise? That you are desperate, and so much so that you'd start making up my responses for me?

But hey, while we're on the subject I will admit that I am desperate.. desperate for you to prove me wrong and earn £1 million. Take the opportunity Happeh, if you can.

However, I have now offered you £1 million, so hopefully you will double your efforts and provide what every person on this forum wants. Once you have done so, I shall be poor and you can congratulate yourself to your hearts content

Pay attention: This has nothing to do with psychology, but reality. I have offered you £1 million to take that step between fantasy and reality. Only you can do so, and I urge you to make the move. Ok, I am a bit dissuaded by the threat of losing my life's savings, but I am willing to make that gamble right now, (being a man of science).

Let's assume that you, Happeh, are made happy by taking my £1 million. I can guarantee you that there will still be millions of unhappy people for me to abuse.

While it is entirely irrelevant to anything that featured on my last post, you are welcome to it. You can call me any names you want, you can defame my nickname to your hearts content AND you can earn £1 million while doing so. Dare you take it?

Oh you big mouth. I want to jump out of my chair, hunt you down and handcuff you while I get a lawyer to take all this down and make you sign it.

I, Happeh, hereby accept the challenge of Snakelord. The entire sciforums is a witness.

The rules are as I said before.

Snake brings the money to the meeting with him.

There must be honest, independent people to corroborate my proof.

Snake must pay my way to the meeting. He is rich so what is some hundreds of dollars for a plane ticket and hotel?

The rules of proof must be stated beforehand in a clear way so that Snake cannot slither his way out of it.

Oh Oh Oh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I need to start calling my buddies that I am gonna be rich.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can you recommend any site seeing places in Britain? I always wanted to visit.
 
Huwy said:
Happeh, you've claimed that fairies, dragons, and elves were once real, because stories are written about them.

Did I say once? They are still real. Right now. In the modern world. You just don't see to many of them because the human race is devolving.

What I said, pay attention, is that elf, dragon and fairy are all words that describe a human being who possesses certain attributes.

Huwy said:
You've claimed the human body has an energy force around it like a hula hooop that is like a force field from star trek enterprise - that it stops people bumping into each other (as opposed to them just not wanting to bump - and despite the fact that blind people do it all the time).

That is so sloppy. I used the hoola hoop as an example. A hoola hoop is only 1 inch tall. Your energy field covers your entire body. It is not a solid thing. Sometimes people bounce off, sometimes not. There are many factors to account for.

Huwy said:
You find photos of people tilting their heads (who probably tilt their heads no more than normal people), and make wild generalisations based on a single photo. The lines you have drawn on photos of people are ridiculous.
You slander homosexuals, and people who masturbate, because you have some kind of hangup/insecurity about sexual activity.

What is this slander stuff? Am I slandering a man with a broken leg if he has a broken leg? Or am I describing reality? Wild generalizations? No. Wait until I get Snakelords money. Then you will be singing a different tune.

Huwy said:
So who is behaving more childish? Keep on playing your age game, as a cover up for who is really being immature. Elves and fairies and dragons. You make borat laugh.

Your attempts to put me down only work if they are correct. I know exactly what I mean. You do not. Your words mean nothing to me because I know you do not understand me.

Huwy said:
But your other theories about people are outrageous, and are a result of your pervasive paranoia and narcissism.

Nope.

Huwy said:
Who is the child? Really. I appreciate having a wild imagination, but this is just delusional. Your magical thinking is ridiculous, especially at your "age".

It is not. If you could examine and evaluate evidence, I would prove it to you.
 
You realise though happeh, that you would have to actually "prove" your theories to get the money, right?
You do understand what the definition of the words "examine", "evidence" and "proof" mean don't you?
Do you want me to paste in definitions for you? You choose any dictionary you like, except the "happeh" dictionary, which also has "bowl of spaghetti", and "happeh fibres" under human body, as well as "see 'egg'." under the word "Eye".

It doesn't mean finding particular photos of specific people (bill gates might not even masturbate for all you know) with their heads tilted to one side, or forward, and drawing lines. One of the guys you posted is a suspected terrorist who is from melbourne, nicknamed "Jihad jack". How do you know such a devout muslim would masturbate a lot? Let alone at all?

I swear at the end, you would go "I win!! Give me the money!!" When you completely failed to prove anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top