Masturbation is for Losers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Happeh's quote:
What is really funny is this shows how young and inexperienced you are.

The one with the inexperience, funny, irrational, and child like mannerism here is you Happs!. You keep demonstrating this fact with every single post you make, and further contribute, and entertain your noting as if you really had anything original to say. Many here including me, have pointed out all your flaws and even your theory is not original, see above post.

You hear children and try to start this trouble. You missed something
very very important.

Coming from you I really seriously doubt that.

How do you define child?

Innocense. Which apparently you show, with your dumbed up theory, you show inveteracy towards your illogical theory.

You will be surprised, chagrined, and I hope ashamed, to know that I consider you a child.

You already know what most of us here think of you, that you dont feel shame, that most of us here consider you ingnorant, idiotic, and full of shit!. :rolleyes:

I would talk to someone else and describe you as
"some child going to uni".

You have talked to many in other forums, have been refuted of your silly notions, and even banned from further advocating your stupidity, thus the only child here apparently is you.

You must always, always, always, watch every single word a person says,
and think about all the permutations and combinations of what is going
on before you jump to conclusions.

If I were you, I'd take my own advise.

Godless
 
My guess is that Heppah think's he's right (assuming he really doesn't and this isn't just a show) because Heppah is perceptive of something in people. Perhaps he looks into the eyes of the people involved and sees something that only he would see and mistakelny labels his perception or rather his reflection upon his perception "a theory". This kind of evidence is difficult to overcome given that to him it must seem very real, direct from his personality - screaming to him "look here at this masturbator and their bad health". Heppah should realize - were he to "think so good" though, that this perception is personal and other people see things differently. The fact that others frequently and fervently repeat that it doesn't seem it that way should be a clear indicator to him, but he mistakes rejection of his analysis as rejection of his right to present the analysis. It would seem that a whole complex has developed around his inability to understand that his perception varies in this regard from that of others.

Heppah, your argument relies wholly on you to interpret the pictures as your perception dictates. When others apply their perception you reject it as "non-observant" or "untrained". You are as unfair and those you claim are unfair. Please consider rethinking your approach to this topic.
 
wes,

I'm not so sure that this isn't all an intentional joke and that H is merely trying to wind us up purely for fun. But no, if I were going to conduct an experiment to see how far I could convince critical thinkers into believig a nonsense then I would be as practical and subtle as possible, i.e. make myself sound believable. In religion we know the apologetics take this approach quite seriously. H has no subtlety and has not even begun to present anything in the least bit convincing, in fact quite the reverse.

What would be more interesting here is to try to understand what makes someone like H behave the way he does. Snakelord suggested homosexual but I don't think that is correct. Disturbed as he undoubtedly is I don't see that we can conclude Gay. Paranoid certainly, but what else can we deduce from his anti-social and irrational behavior here?

Note that if you respond to him, whether politely or otherwise he simply uses that as fuel to fire more nonsense and abuse. I'd certainly strongly recommened a reduction in the fuel provision at this point.
 
Cris,

You've said pretty much what I've said here. Note "assuming this isn't just a show". If it's not, I'd re-iterate what I said above and add that I've deduce it's an ego issue, whereby the conviction associated with his perception is irrational.

For a while I was thinking it's really Wanderer doing what he does best. ;) I'm still not sure I'm wrong. I think snake mostly assumed homosexuality as a "reversal of jackass" (just to stick with the theme) tactic.

Regardless, I think many... oh so many people mistake their perception for objective reality as I was trying to say above. I'll most likely always contend that observational distance renders objective reality unknowable - and only faith in our perception provides a basis for our inherently subjective analysis. (as you probably know, because you know me to some extent, I'm not claiming "there is no reality without observation", simply that such a thing as "objective reality" cannot be directly accessed because of the whole stimulous -> thought thing)
 
Note that if you respond to him, whether politely or otherwise he simply uses that as fuel to fire more nonsense and abuse. I'd certainly strongly recommened a reduction in the fuel provision at this point.

I would agree whole-heartedly. Happeh is clearly off his rocker for whatever reason(s). Responses are only met with more abuse and nonsense. Perhaps its time to stop adding fuel. I'm done with Happeh.
 
wesmorris said:
Heppah, your argument relies wholly on you to interpret the pictures as your perception dictates. When others apply their perception you reject it as "non-observant" or "untrained". You are as unfair and those you claim are unfair. Please consider rethinking your approach to this topic.

U know? My grandpappy used to tell me he could pick the good cows from the bad cows. And so could his brother and his neighbor. And, well, just about every farmer worth his salt could tell a good cow just by looking at it.

I guess they were all insane according to you, right?

U know? There is a dog show on PBS that is very popular. They parade dogs around in a circle. Then the judges pick the best ones. Who are the judges? We are told the judges are special people who know dogs and know what is good pedigree and what is not.

But I guess, according to you, they are all liars and retards right? I mean, come on! What could be stupider than thinking that years of experience in observation of a particular animal, be it dog, cow, or human being, might result in the ability to use that experience to make judgements about cows, dogs, and human beings.

You really ought to go set those people straight. You know it all. Got tell them. Tell the pig farmers, the cow farmers, the chicken farmers, the llama farmers, the ostrich farmers they are all crazy, insane, lying or stupid.

Go tell all the dog breeders, cat breeders, parrot breeders, ferret breeders and all other animal breeders that their claims of expertise in judging animals is a bunch of lies because you, the scientist in his chair who has probably done nothing more than drive by a farm, knows everything there is about how to observe and judge animals. And what those people claim is all a bunch of hooey. Because you said so.
 
(Q) said:
I would agree whole-heartedly. Happeh is clearly off his rocker for whatever reason(s). Responses are only met with more abuse and nonsense. Perhaps its time to stop adding fuel. I'm done with Happeh.

I like you Q. It is because you are so easy to kick. All of you are easy to kick, but, you are a mod. You are supposed to be better than the crowd.

You know there are no coincidences right? I was looking thru an article on high IQ societies. You know. Mensa, that kind of thing. Look what I found.

"Minerva Society (1 out of 1,000)

Founded in 1987 by Kevin Langdon, Fred Britton, Jalon Leach, and Richard Weatherwax at the 99.9 percentile."

Now. You remember why I am picking on you don't you Q? Because you went snooping into my background. You remember my name, don't you Q?

Do you really believe in coincidences?
 
q,

I'm done with Happeh.
Yes I think I'll follow. I began a lengthy psycho-analysis but I don't think posting such a critique of another member is in the spirit of these forums. I'll simply remain silent.
 
Happeh said:
U know? My grandpappy used to tell me he could pick the good cows from the bad cows. And so could his brother and his neighbor. And, well, just about every farmer worth his salt could tell a good cow just by looking at it.

I guess they were all insane according to you, right?

U know? There is a dog show on PBS that is very popular. They parade dogs around in a circle. Then the judges pick the best ones. Who are the judges? We are told the judges are special people who know dogs and know what is good pedigree and what is not.

But I guess, according to you, they are all liars and retards right? I mean, come on! What could be stupider than thinking that years of experience in observation of a particular animal, be it dog, cow, or human being, might result in the ability to use that experience to make judgements about cows, dogs, and human beings.

You really ought to go set those people straight. You know it all. Got tell them. Tell the pig farmers, the cow farmers, the chicken farmers, the llama farmers, the ostrich farmers they are all crazy, insane, lying or stupid.

Go tell all the dog breeders, cat breeders, parrot breeders, ferret breeders and all other animal breeders that their claims of expertise in judging animals is a bunch of lies because you, the scientist in his chair who has probably done nothing more than drive by a farm, knows everything there is about how to observe and judge animals. And what those people claim is all a bunch of hooey. Because you said so.

I didn't tell you to change your opinion, you jerk. I asked that you reconsider your approach to the topic in the context of discussing it. You can think you know all you want, I don't have a problem with that. I DO however have a problem with the fact that you're a jerk who tries to cram your perception down people's throats who disagree with your perception, jackass.

Buh bye.
 
Happeh:

You have not participated with me. Why on earth would I particpate with you? I think you said "You make no sense".

I just thought that you would have tried to implement your own "theory" on yourself, that's all. But perhaps not. Maybe your head tilts to one side.
 
"you will learn more about real life than you ever will paying money to those liars at your school."

hahahahaha
he says he thinks i'm a child at school, and the teachers are liars.

What is that the best you can do happeh? Try and offend me because i'm obviously younger than you? You think you have life experience, but its all either been bitter, or bullshit.

Old people that try and demean young people because they are ignorant or inexperienced, may have a point, but when I have a higher education level than you Happeh, your experience is just rubbish.
I can safely assume this because of your attitudes.

What you sat around thinking? Oh lets all clap hands!

Narrow minded old man, with no further education. Thinks he knows everything, calls university scientists liars, whilst making metaphors about eggs, bowls of spaghetti, and "fibres".

Makes derogatory comments about people younger than hims age, because he can't hack that someone of 23 would know something more about a topic than he does.

Bitter mistrusting and paranoid with "ideas of reference", "notions of persecution" etc.

Worst part is, when dozens of people criticise you, you think its their fault.
its always "i'm right and everyone else is wrong", isn't it happeh?

I now realise why everyone has been so rude to you, so dismissive, so critical, over these 40 pages - you give them no other choice.

I'm not worried you'd molest the children happeh, i'm worried about the way you'd talk to them because of your serious personality disorder.
 
I think Huwy, we can feel fairly secure that any child would see through his nonsense in a second. Children are often better at spotting bullshit artists than adults.
Although, for my sins, I've read most of this interminable thread I've somehow missed the parts where he claims to be old. I guess I just find it difficult to believe.
As someone in the early years of their second half century I would just like to say Happeh is not typical of the older person. Some people are just gifted with stupidity at birth then nurture it as they grow old.
 
Oh I have so much respect for my paternal grandfather and maternal grandmother, they are the sweetest, most tolerant, caring people, and I want to be like a combination of them when i'm their age.

They appreciate young people (within reason) as opposed to constantly criticising them. They both admit they can learn things even at their age. They are both a true inspiration for how i want to age, and I tell them this sometimes.

My concern is that I seriously believe that happeh has demonstrated a number of traits of both (compensatory) narcissistic personality disorder, or paranoid personality disorders. Some children are resilient, independent, some are a lot more vulnerable, especially to adults like this.

Is there anyone else who believes either or both of these may fit the criteria demonstrated here?

"You can't trust anyone but yourself"
"People lie, everyone lies."
"People always conspire to insult me, destroy my reputation."
"Teachers are liars" (true, some are, and some are arseholes, bullies etc)

"I'm always right, everyone else is wrong."
"My mistakes aren't my fault, but other peoples mistakes/inappropriate behaviour is unacceptable."
"I'm an expert in this or that."
"If people criticise my mistakes, i take it personally."
"James R was polite/correct until he said I was wrong."

Anything else I've missed?

Sorry to talk about you in the third person Happeh, but I feel a real combination of fascination, and sympathy towards you.
I admit if you hadn't been so insulting (clutching at straws to defend yourself) I might not be so rude right now.
People have a really hard time dealing with you man, which is why i guess they've given up this debate.
Its a shame your belief that everyone is just "out to get you" has again, come true, but I don't think you've given them any other choice. Why else would everyone "turn" on you, or make personal attacks?
They have nothing to insult you with but what you've said to them.

Maybe if your theories were more positive, instead of being so negative and critical.

If your ideas / theories only had the intention of making you happy/relaxed etc, or helped you to make friends rather than enemies, I don't think anyone would object so strongly.
 
Cris said:
q,

Yes I think I'll follow. I began a lengthy psycho-analysis but I don't think posting such a critique of another member is in the spirit of these forums. I'll simply remain silent.

What you mean is you began a lengthy character assasination meant to belittle me in the eyes of others so you could convince them not to listen to me, and so that you will stop feeling fear that I am right, because you have asserted your superiority with your character assasination labeled "psycho analysis".
 
wesmorris said:
I didn't tell you to change your opinion, you jerk. I asked that you reconsider your approach to the topic in the context of discussing it. You can think you know all you want, I don't have a problem with that. I DO however have a problem with the fact that you're a jerk who tries to cram your perception down people's throats who disagree with your perception, jackass.

Buh bye.

Thank god. Another brainless abuser goes away.

Notice very carefully how he ignored every point I made about trained people being able to diagnose animals.

He is talking mean and running away because I schooled him. He knows just as well as I that every person I mentioned does use experience with animals to make observations on animals. It is common sense.

He looks like a fool so he runs away.
 
James R said:
Happeh:

I just thought that you would have tried to implement your own "theory" on yourself, that's all. But perhaps not. Maybe your head tilts to one side.

Maybe yours does?
 
Huwy said:
"you will learn more about real life than you ever will paying money to those liars at your school."

hahahahaha
he says he thinks i'm a child at school, and the teachers are liars.

What is that the best you can do happeh? Try and offend me because i'm obviously younger than you? You think you have life experience, but its all either been bitter, or bullshit.

Are you offended? You are a child. It is fact. The teachers do lie, purposefully or unknowingly. Not all the time of course. But you need to watch them.

Huwy said:
Old people that try and demean young people because they are ignorant or inexperienced, may have a point, but when I have a higher education level than you Happeh, your experience is just rubbish.

Do you? Are you sure of that?

Huwy said:
What you sat around thinking? Oh lets all clap hands!

Narrow minded old man, with no further education. Thinks he knows everything, calls university scientists liars, whilst making metaphors about eggs, bowls of spaghetti, and "fibres".

Makes derogatory comments about people younger than hims age, because he can't hack that someone of 23 would know something more about a topic than he does.

Bitter mistrusting and paranoid with "ideas of reference", "notions of persecution" etc.

Worst part is, when dozens of people criticise you, you think its their fault.
its always "i'm right and everyone else is wrong", isn't it happeh?

Lost your mind huh? Isn't it ugly when that happens? And yes. I am right and everybody else is wrong. What can I do? I tell them to their faces they are wrong. I tell them all they need to do to prove I am right is use the same instruction sheet for an experiment that they were handed in 9th grade chemistry. Observe and extrapolate.

No one can. Plenty of name callers and haters, but no one who remembers what observe and extrapolate means.

Huwy said:
I now realise why everyone has been so rude to you, so dismissive, so critical, over these 40 pages - you give them no other choice.

They are rude and dismissive because they are afraid. They paid money and spent years in school. They cannot do basic science experiments. They believed everything they ever read in the paper, they ever heard on TV, that every politician told them. To believe all those sources are liars is scary. It is better to be mean to me and chase me away, than it is to get scared believeing those people were liars.

Especially when they see the proof of my claims every day. No WMD in Iraq. Bush spying on people outside of the law. CEO's stealing money from Enron or Worldcom. Every day there is a headline that says "Authority is a bunch of lying stealing crooks". They can ignore all of that if they can just shut me up.

Huwy said:
I'm not worried you'd molest the children happeh, i'm worried about the way you'd talk to them because of your serious personality disorder.

You're pathetic. I liked you better when you still had control of your brain. This hysterical stuff is like the programmed droids in most other forums.
 
Ophiolite said:
I think Huwy, we can feel fairly secure that any child would see through his nonsense in a second. Children are often better at spotting bullshit artists than adults.
Although, for my sins, I've read most of this interminable thread I've somehow missed the parts where he claims to be old. I guess I just find it difficult to believe.
As someone in the early years of their second half century I would just like to say Happeh is not typical of the older person. Some people are just gifted with stupidity at birth then nurture it as they grow old.

And you ought to know.
 
OK children. Now that you are all so thourougly frightened I might be correct that you are back to the personal attacks found on Yahoo or other low brow boards, let's get back to science. You know. Where you look at something, then try to figure out how it works?

Here is the next picture

5Wankers.jpg


As you can see, Dick Cheney is leaning to the right just like all the other right handed wankers.

Happeh Theory says masturbation cause people to hunch forward. Cheney is hunched forward. Happeh Theory says masturbation causes a bad arm. Cheney is making the sign of the loser with his right arm.

Cheney is intriguing in that he has the big round head. Someone taught him how to live life properly. Probably the Israelis that he works for. Most people with masturbation damage will show a distorted head. Because of the angle of the photo, the eyes are difficult to see clearly. He does appear to have a big and small eye.

Finally, Happeh Theory says that people with masturbation damage will develop the urge to hurt people because they become cut off from the ability to feel. Cheney is well know for ordering the deaths of people around the world. Cheney thinks torture is a good idea.

Cheney fits the symptoms of Happeh Theory just like the other 4 people you see in the picture.
 
To be sung to the tune of Happy Days Are Here Again, [Original Music and Lyrics by J. Yellen and M. Ager]


Happeh days are here again
The Zionists strike fear again
So let's all turn quite queer again
Happeh days are here again

Altogether wank in time
If we do it right
It will be sublime
So let's tilt our heads, it ain’t no crime
Happeh days are here again

Your upright posture is gone
It’s total blindness from now on

Happeh days are here again
The Zionists strike fear again
So let's all turn quite queer again
Happeh days are here again

Repeat and fade....


For those unfamiliar with the song go this site for piano accompaniment.
http://www.niehs.nih.gov/kids/lyrics/happydays.htm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top