Masturbation is for Losers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I will be sure to seek you out and wave my butt in your face when I get famous.

I will personally get down on all fours and kiss your butt if that ever happens. But I would tend to think you'll get famous a very different way.
 
(Q) said:
I will be sure to seek you out and wave my butt in your face when I get famous.

I will personally get down on all fours and kiss your butt if that ever happens. But I would tend to think you'll get famous a very different way.

This includes fame of any type. I get interviewed on the internet. Some radio talks about my book. Some gossip column starts talking about it. Anything.

I am going to eat something real nasty before you come by. ;)
 
This includes fame of any type. I get interviewed on the internet. Some radio talks about my book. Some gossip column starts talking about it. Anything.

Talk to Howard Stern, we can all use the good laugh! :D

G.
 
Doesn't matter if it is comedy or not. He said fame. That means any kind.

U know? I know there are some silent scientists out there reading this thread. Not posting in participation. Maybe they are the real scientists that think. Maybe they are waiting to see something before they comment. They know it takes more than one photo. They don't want to post and ask because then they get involved in the brouhaha.

This picture is for Snakelord. Snake keeps insisting the heads of these men are oriented the way they are so they can look at something. Of course they are. They head has eyes and the eyes are looking.

What I am referring to is that their heads take this positions because of the underlying structure of their body. That underlying structure has become twisted so that their head twists. Involuntarily, not voluntarily.

3Wankers.jpg


Again, the right side of the head is tilted downwards. Most people wank with the right hand. One eye is obviously larger than the other. The difference here is that the man is not looking to his left. He is trying to look straight into the camera.

Why not stand up straight and look into the camera? Because he is a wanker and the inside of his body feels like it is comfortable, feels like it is normal, in that corkscrewed way his head is on his neck.

It is more difficult to see, but his head has the same "fat right side thin left side" as the other two.

And snake? If you had a pair of calipers or some other measuring device, the device will show the difference in thickness. That "Gravity pulls the low side bigger" was just about the most pathetic explanation I have heard.

The new photo also reveals a new symptom I have not talked about. The man is exposing lots of teeth like he is smiling. That is another symptom. This one is tricky. There is exposing of the teeth that comes from being very strong and healthy. It looks almost exactly the same as exposing the teeth from wanking or other damage. You have to look at the rest of the person and the surrounding head to decide if they are healthy or damaged.

This man is damaged beyond doubt. An example of a healthy person exposing lots of teeth might be in the many beautiful black women you see with very large mouths that look like they could swallow an apple.
 
Last edited:
Would it make any difference to you doubters if I told you that I could show you the difference in person on your own bodies? If you show the symptoms I speak of, I can go right to where it is on our body and point at it for you. I could take your hand and make you rub the affected area so you could feel what it feels like.

Then I would have you rub a different part of your body that was healthy so you could feel the difference between the two. I could incontrovertibly prove to you with your own body that my theory is right in maybe 1/2 hour or an hour at the most.

I will take any of you on. I will bet you any amount of money you want, that I can cover. As I said, you must show the symptoms of course or I can't find them. If you are a healthy person, there is nothing to find or to show you.

If that kind of confidence does not convince you, you are really stubborn.

You can't hide it. You can even try to send me ringers if you want. You can try to trick me any way you can think of. I can read bodies of damage. I will go right to where anyone is damaged. Any good doctor can do this same thing. I am not special.
 
Happeh said:
Again, the right side of the head is tilted downwards. Most people wank with the right hand. One eye is obviously larger than the other. The difference here is that the man is not looking to his left. He is trying to look straight into the camera.
Are you saying there is correlation between which hand you "wank" with, and which way your head tilts?
 
Happeh said:
You will not understand. You are not arms and legs and torso and head. You are a bowl of spaghetti. By that I mean fibers. You can view your body as being composed of fibers. This fibers connect all over the body. The toes connect to the stomach. The fingers connect to the head. Your entire body is interconnected by all of these fibers.

If these fibers are damaged anywhere along their length, the entire fiber suffers. Sort of like a high tension cable for a bridge. The entire cable must meet specs to hold up the bridge. If a person were to go to a one inch section of the cable and cut it with a saw, the entire cable is now worthless. The entire cable does not meet specs.

If a fiber is damaged at the penis, the entire fiber, all the way up to the eye is also damaged. That is one way to describe how actions on the penis affect other areas of the body that are physically far removed from the penis

No, it is not one way to describe anything, let alone how masturbation causes blindness.
What are these "fibres" called? Do you know?
Are you talking about nerve fibres? They are called sensory neurons, the afferent sensory neurons run up the posterior columns of the spinal cord. Want to continue insisting I know nothing, and that you need to speak to me like a child??
Actually, the toes don't connect to the stomach at all, apart from sharing blood from the same body.
Research show's that frequent sex has many health benefits.

Happeh said:
2 things. The vagina is circular and completely encloses the penis to exert relatively equal pressure around the entire circumference of the penis. The hand will usually only enclose part of the penis. It also applies uneven pressure because the fingers all possess different strengths.

When you masturbate, where is the force on the penis coming from? It comes from you. During sex, where is the force on the penis coming from? The woman.

What does "where the force comes from" or "how it is distributed" have anything to do with it, the stimulation, or the orgasm?
You haven't answered my question.
How does the penis know the difference between the hand and the vagina?

Happeh said:
Asking questions about me personally is digging for some way to devalue or disregard my words.

Happeh,
You are trying to change the subject. You've come up with an excuse not to answer the question.
I'm not trying to devalue you you, You assumed others don't understand the body, or don't understand psychology.
I've asked you to talk to me on the most detailed level you can, and you've 1st maintained your position here that nobody is trained or educationed about the body, which I'm sure some are, including myself.
2nd, even on the basic level that you are "trying" to speak about this topic, you have many misconceptions and say things that simply aren't true.

Happeh said:
I do not know if you know about people or psychology etc. It is very hard to do a study like you have described. I think all of you forget we are dealing with people. People lie. They do it on purpose, they do it to please, they do it out of embarrassment.

Ok, well I am actively learning (at uni) about people and psychology. It is one of my majors.
It is NOT hard to do a study like I have described. Kinsey did studies like that in the 1940s. Know who Alfred Kinsey is? They just made a movie about him.

Happeh said:
If you were to spend time in the medical field, you will find it is common for patients to tell doctors what the patient thinks the doctor wants to hear. This spoils any real science experiment. People are not chemicals in a test tube that never change. If a patient thinks the doctor wants them to say something, they will, even if it is false.

If I "WERE" to spend any time in the field? LOL.
Go look at Kinsey's research. They found people were quite willing to be honest, and that was more than 50 years ago.
They have mechanisms to guard against the phenomenon of people lying.
Its called ensuring anonymity.
Besides, there have already been studies showing 95% of males masturbate.
ALREADY DONE. Embarrassed?

Happeh said:
That is why I say my faith is the only proof I need. I am the only person I can trust not to lie.

You use the same faith as the religious fanatics. If you can't trust ANYONE not to lie, I believe you may be paranoid.


Happeh said:
When I make a point, say I tell them "you are a psychologist or a chemist or an administrator. You are not trained about the body. That is why we have different opinions". Instead of admitting this is true and they are not trained in the area of the human body, they keep insisting they know more than I do.

People have told you their various levels of education, and yet you have continued to avoid the question, with your "ideas of persecution".

Happeh said:
I am left with no alternative but to conclude I am dealing with stubborn people, people playing dominanace/submission games, people with no imagination, or people who were graduated with a science degree because they paid for it, not because they possess the abilites of scientific observation and deduction.

If all of that is true, for me, the only alternative is childspeak. If I speak in a patronizing and childish way, maybe they will not feel threatened by my confidence and my certainty and they will talk to me.

Thats not the only alternative - how do you expect people to respect what you say, if you speak in "childspeak"?
Truth is you choose that "alternative" for a reason. Can you speak to us in any medical/anatomical/physiological detail at all?
 
crazyfreespirit said:
Are you saying there is correlation between which hand you "wank" with, and which way your head tilts?

Usually. The human body is like a memory plastic. If you do something for a long time, the body tends to stay that way. For instance, people who use guns will look like they are always holding a gun. Their hand and arm and shoulder are aligned all the time like they are holding a gun.

The same thing happens with wanking. After some time, the body will stick in the posture it takes during masturbation. Just like a memory plastic does. When the person feels tension from any source, the body will want to go to that posture that it has been formed into under pressure. The masturbation posture.

Watch yourself in the mirror. Most people wank with the right hand. If you look in the mirror, you will see that you probably lean to the right. After 5 or 10 years, you will always lean to the right. All the time. You now have the crippled arm and leg described by Happeh Theory.

The amount and direction of body lean will be related to the exact method used for masturbation.
 
Huwy said:
No, it is not one way to describe anything, let alone how masturbation causes blindness.
What are these "fibres" called? Do you know?

Here we go. ;) I told you I invented the theory. The fibers are called Happeh Fibers. You want to shoehorn my theory into your view of the world. I told you. The western medicine view of the body is flawed. It is incomplete.

Huwy said:
Are you talking about nerve fibres? They are called sensory neurons, the afferent sensory neurons run up the posterior columns of the spinal cord. Want to continue insisting I know nothing, and that you need to speak to me like a child??

I am talking about exactly what I said I was talking about. A way of understanding what happens inside of the body. One visual image is to imagine the body consists of fibers as I described.

Huwy said:
Actually, the toes don't connect to the stomach at all, apart from sharing blood from the same body.

You are wrong.

Huwy said:
Research show's that frequent sex has many health benefits.

I do not like to talk about this. I don't want to engage in discussion about is sex good or not. I am only focusing on the one aspect I am interested in. Excessive sex or masturbation can cause trouble. Every one is different. What is excessive for one person is nothing for another person. All of those factors need to be accounted for in a thorough scientific study.

I am one man trying to get things kick started. I am focusing only on the damaging effects of excessive sex or masturbation.

Huwy said:
What does "where the force comes from" or "how it is distributed" have anything to do with it, the stimulation, or the orgasm?

That is a very good question. If you knew the answer, you would understand the basis of Happeh Theory.

Huwy said:
You haven't answered my question.
How does the penis know the difference between the hand and the vagina?

Sure I did. You weren't paying attention. A vagina is a 360 degree circle. Your hand might be 270 degrees of a circle. 90 degress of your penis is all alone when you masturbate. You think your penis doesn't notice that?

Huwy said:
Happeh,
You are trying to change the subject. You've come up with an excuse not to answer the question.
I'm not trying to devalue you you,

I have only your word for this. I mean nothing personally. In my history, I have had a lot of trouble with terrible people. They do not like what I say. No act is to low for them. I have had people approach me, talk to me like a friend, then, when I let my guard down, they stabbed me in the back. I do not know you. You could be one of those people. It is prudent for me to be cautious.

Huwy said:
You assumed others don't understand the body, or don't understand psychology.
I've asked you to talk to me on the most detailed level you can, and you've 1st maintained your position here that nobody is trained or educationed about the body, which I'm sure some are, including myself.

I would disagree. You want to label the fibers I talk about as neurons. I don't think that is what they are. To me, that says you do not understand the body. I don't think of them as neurons. I think of them as fibers like are wrapped around the core of a golf ball. Hard, stringy, tought things that are strong enough to make a human body work. Neurons are small soft things with no physical strength that carry nerve impulses.

Huwy said:
2nd, even on the basic level that you are "trying" to speak about this topic, you have many misconceptions and say things that simply aren't true.

I told you that you would not understand. It is my position that it is you that has the misconceptions. If you are basing your knowledge on the view of the human body found in an anatomy book, that is flawed. It is incomplete. It doesn't contain any of the really important details about the body.


Huwy said:
Ok, well I am actively learning (at uni) about people and psychology. It is one of my majors.
It is NOT hard to do a study like I have described. Kinsey did studies like that in the 1940s. Know who Alfred Kinsey is? They just made a movie about him.

Yes I know who Kinsey is. You are kind of funny. If you are at uni, you are a kid. But you know more than me. I am older than you. I have seen more, learned more and experienced more than you have. My worldview is larger than yours. I would not be so hasty to claim I know it all if I was you. Wait until you have some more information before you rush to judgement.

Huwy said:
If I "WERE" to spend any time in the field? LOL.
Go look at Kinsey's research. They found people were quite willing to be honest, and that was more than 50 years ago.
They have mechanisms to guard against the phenomenon of people lying.
Its called ensuring anonymity.
Besides, there have already been studies showing 95% of males masturbate.
ALREADY DONE. Embarrassed?

Are you implying you have spent time in the medical field? I don't care what Kinsey says. People lie. I trust myself. So what if 95% of males masturbate. What is your point? If the majority does it, then it must be OK? Lots of people smoke. Smoking is generally agreed to be bad for you. In a room full of smokers, they would tell you smoking was not bad for you. They have to. They must lie to themselves or else they have to face the fact they are taking 10 years off of their lifespan.

Huwy said:
People have told you their various levels of education, and yet you have continued to avoid the question, with your "ideas of persecution".

A penis measuring contest will not decide if my theory is valid. Only examination of the theory will determine if it is valid or not.

Huwy said:
Thats not the only alternative - how do you expect people to respect what you say, if you speak in "childspeak"?
Truth is you choose that "alternative" for a reason. Can you speak to us in any medical/anatomical/physiological detail at all?

You did very good. You spoke better and were more reasonable than any of the adult or employed people here. Maybe James R is like you. He was reasonable until he decided I was wrong. You started going a little towards the personal stuff at the end. You are beginning to emulate the submission/dominance games you see displayed by your elders. Resist the urge. That is for politics, business, sports, etc. Not science.

If you have a detailed question, I will answer it.
 
Happeh said:
Here we go. ;) I told you I invented the theory. The fibers are called Happeh Fibers. You want to shoehorn my theory into your view of the world. I told you. The western medicine view of the body is flawed. It is incomplete.
I am talking about exactly what I said I was talking about. A way of understanding what happens inside of the body. One visual image is to imagine the body consists of fibers as I described.

Oh, how cute! Pity is completely flawed. Seriously, you would like acupuncture, it works on the same theories.

Happeh said:
You are wrong.

Oh really? Ok, how then, do the toes connect to the stomach, in any functional, sensory, or health related way? Other than them obviously being in the same body?

Happeh said:
I am one man trying to get things kick started. I am focusing only on the damaging effects of excessive sex or masturbation.

Which after nearly 40 pages, you still have yet to provide any evidence or detail as to how there could be any damaging effects.

Happeh said:
Sure I did. You weren't paying attention. A vagina is a 360 degree circle. Your hand might be 270 degrees of a circle. 90 degress of your penis is all alone when you masturbate. You think your penis doesn't notice that?

No, I don't think the penis "notices" that. The penis doesn't have a brain.
How is it supposed to go "hey I'm being wanked!! I'm going to make this person go blind!!" Versus "Hey I'm having sex, thats ok and healthy".????

Happeh said:
I have only your word for this. I mean nothing personally. In my history, I have had a lot of trouble with terrible people. They do not like what I say. No act is to low for them. I have had people approach me, talk to me like a friend, then, when I let my guard down, they stabbed me in the back. I do not know you. You could be one of those people. It is prudent for me to be cautious.

I'm sorry to hear you've had a bad experience with other people, but it is obviously effecting the way you interact with people now.
If people criticise your theory, you shouldn't take it so personally.

Happeh said:
I would disagree. You want to label the fibers I talk about as neurons. I don't think that is what they are. To me, that says you do not understand the body. I don't think of them as neurons. I think of them as fibers like are wrapped around the core of a golf ball. Hard, stringy, tought things that are strong enough to make a human body work. Neurons are small soft things with no physical strength that carry nerve impulses.

Oh like a golf ball! Or spaghetti? Or an egg? Why is it, then, when people are cut open, these "fibres" are nowhere to be seen? Rather all the other anatomical features, which are already given sensible names? (except for the latin ones)

Happeh said:
I told you that you would not understand. It is my position that it is you that has the misconceptions. If you are basing your knowledge on the view of the human body found in an anatomy book, that is flawed. It is incomplete. It doesn't contain any of the really important details about the body.

Oh I didn't understand. Why?
Oh the anatomy book is flawed!! Oh ok, they must have been seeing things that werent there, or ignoring things that were, when they cut open those bodies, tens of thousands of times, taking photos.



Happeh said:
Yes I know who Kinsey is. You are kind of funny. If you are at uni, you are a kid. But you know more than me. I am older than you. I have seen more, learned more and experienced more than you have. My worldview is larger than yours. I would not be so hasty to claim I know it all if I was you. Wait until you have some more information before you rush to judgement.

Well you'll know then, that kinsey has done a lot of research where people were honest about their sexual practices!!

Oh I'm a kid!! Ok, lets ignore the fact that plenty of people in my classes are 30-50 years old. Plenty! I am friends with some of them.
So if you've obviously never been to university, because if you had, you'd know a good quarter of the people there are over 30, what does that make you? More immature than a kid?

More assumptions about people, like my age.
Just because you may be older you think you are smarter or more experienced? Bullshit. You know nothing about this topic.

Happeh said:
I don't care what Kinsey says. People lie. I trust myself. So what if 95% of males masturbate. What is your point? If the majority does it, then it must be OK? Lots of people smoke. Smoking is generally agreed to be bad for you. In a room full of smokers, they would tell you smoking was not bad for you. They have to. They must lie to themselves or else they have to face the fact they are taking 10 years off of their lifespan.

Kinsey is reknown!! And I'm afraid you must suffer from some kind of paranoia, or miss trust. I really don't mean that offensively, If my wife fucked me over I'd be pissed off too. My last gf lied and hurt me deliberately, so I know what thats like to a lesser degree.


Happeh said:
You did very good. You spoke better and were more reasonable than any of the adult or employed people here. Maybe James R is like you. He was reasonable until he decided I was wrong. You started going a little towards the personal stuff at the end. You are beginning to emulate the submission/dominance games you see displayed by your elders. Resist the urge. That is for politics, business, sports, etc. Not science.


Happeh said:
I did very good? (lol) like I respect you or what you think about me?
Oh until James R he decided you were wrong!!
When it comes to playing games, i think you are the main culprit.

I asked you a bunch of questions, and in reply, you perfectly illustrated your complete lack of knowledge and your flawed thinking, on this issue.

If you think thats stabbing you in the back I feel sorry for you.
If you think you are right any everyone else is wrong, i fear you will lead a very dissapointing life.
I don't know your age but if you are young it may not be too late to try and change.

Happeh said:
If you have a detailed question, I will answer it.

I asked you a detailed question, how exactly does masturbation cause any of these problems? You failed to answer it at all, infact, you tried to hide by changing the topic, and using abstract images.

I told you how you might go about acquiring evidence for your theory, and you weren't interested. Its also obvious that you never trust anyone or their opinion, and assume they are lying or have malicious intent.

I admit I have problems, i wrote about some of them in my new years resolution. I want to be less negative. I want to learn more, and learn more about how to be less negative.

Know what? These problems made me so miserable, at some point (around 18) I had to admit I may be wrong about some things I wasnt willing to admit that about. AFter that, I learnt a lot, and I changed for the better, and my life improved.

I hope I'm still capable of that by the time I'm your age, whatever that is.
No disrespect, just concern.
 
Hey to the other members following this post, could you please fill me in on the comics/cartoons/dick blog/soliciting, that is if they weren't "made up to slander" happeh. Just point me to the page/ website.
Not because I'm looking for a laugh, because it concerns me.

More importantly please fill me in on any possible contact with children.
This concerns me. (Please not a teacher... please not a teacher)
 
Huwy said:
Oh, how cute! Pity is completely flawed. Seriously, you would like acupuncture, it works on the same theories.

Yep. A smarty pants kid alright. Yes I do like acupuncture. When you get over being a smarty pants, check into it, you will learn more about real life than you ever will paying money to those liars at your school.

Huwy said:
Oh really? Ok, how then, do the toes connect to the stomach, in any functional, sensory, or health related way? Other than them obviously being in the same body?

I told you. Fibers are one way to think about it. I could offer another way, but your tone is not so good here. I am reading the rest of the post to see if you keep coming for me before I act the good guy and give you what you ask for.

Huwy said:
Which after nearly 40 pages, you still have yet to provide any evidence or detail as to how there could be any damaging effects.

You been reading Snake haven't you? I told you to ignore your elders. They will contaminate your thought processess with useless male agrression displays.

Huwy said:
No, I don't think the penis "notices" that. The penis doesn't have a brain.
How is it supposed to go "hey I'm being wanked!! I'm going to make this person go blind!!" Versus "Hey I'm having sex, thats ok and healthy".????

Actually I need to thank you for that. After I read your question, I had an epiphany. I can directly answer your question now, where before I was forced to use imagery and metaphor. I could not have done it without you and your question. Thanks.

Huwy said:
I'm sorry to hear you've had a bad experience with other people, but it is obviously effecting the way you interact with people now.
If people criticise your theory, you shouldn't take it so personally.

Sure it affects me now. If I got hit by a car, all my future actions would be of caution around vehicles. What is your point? People learn from experience?

Huwy said:
Oh like a golf ball! Or spaghetti? Or an egg? Why is it, then, when people are cut open, these "fibres" are nowhere to be seen? Rather all the other anatomical features, which are already given sensible names? (except for the latin ones)

I think they are seen. But know it alls, they know it all. Like you and the other people talking to me. You know everything, so you stop thinking and stop observing. I think someone already did put a lablel on what I referred to as Happeh Fibers. Then they stopped thinking because they labled it.

A very common failing of all scientists.

Huwy said:
Oh I didn't understand. Why?
Oh the anatomy book is flawed!! Oh ok, they must have been seeing things that werent there, or ignoring things that were, when they cut open those bodies, tens of thousands of times, taking photos.

Becoming hysterical will not change things. You are displaying the symptoms of a person whose authority figure is being challenged. This is why your elders react to me with such hate. The cannot stand the sensations you are feeling right now. The fear, the sense of floating or instability. They would rather close their minds, be rude, and refuse to think, instead of allowing my discovery to instill in them the feelings that you are now currently experiencing.

Huwy said:
Well you'll know then, that kinsey has done a lot of research where people were honest about their sexual practices!!

Oh I'm a kid!! Ok, lets ignore the fact that plenty of people in my classes are 30-50 years old. Plenty! I am friends with some of them.
So if you've obviously never been to university, because if you had, you'd know a good quarter of the people there are over 30, what does that make you? More immature than a kid?

You are losing your mind and your argument. I wish I could make it easier for you. At some point in life, everyone goes thru what you are. They find out their mother or wife or the policeman or teacher or politician or whoever is a no good scumbag liar that would stab you in the back for a nickel. When they do, they lose thier mind for however long it takes to accept that yes, that person you trusted completely is a no good lying scumbag. All I can say is, you will get thru to the other side after you suffer.

Huwy said:
More assumptions about people, like my age.
Just because you may be older you think you are smarter or more experienced? Bullshit. You know nothing about this topic.

It does not matter what I think. Use your common sense. Does it seem obvious that a person who is 60, has more life experience than a person who is 20? It is common sense, not braggadoccio.

Huwy said:
Kinsey is reknown!!

So was George Bush. He lied about WMD.

Huwy said:
And I'm afraid you must suffer from some kind of paranoia, or miss trust. I really don't mean that offensively, If my wife fucked me over I'd be pissed off too. My last gf lied and hurt me deliberately, so I know what thats like to a lesser degree.

Many people say that. Comfortable people who have never done anything that authority did not tell them to. It was a nice try with the women remark. You should know that I understand how people like you work, so I set you up all the time. I know people like you will take a helpful comment and turn it back on me. I made up the women examples to make a point. You take the women examples and try to use them to pity me.

If the women examples applied to me, your plan would have worked. Knowing how people like you work, I made up all that stuff about women etc. I gave you bait for you to expose yourself.

I could explain the reasons for my feelings. At this point, you have become another person jeering. You wouldn't hear anything I said.

Huwy said:
I asked you a detailed question, how exactly does masturbation cause any of these problems? You failed to answer it at all, infact, you tried to hide by changing the topic, and using abstract images.

I tried to provide images that you could accept. If I told you the highest level nuclear physics equations, could you understand them? No. You have to go do college algebra, Calculus, Differential equations blah, blah, blah. You take my trying to make the knowledge fit your abilities and make it sound like I am bad.

Masturbation exactly causes those problems thru tension. Forces travel thru the body along improper pathways. Over time the body changes to those improper pathways, instead of standing straight and erect. This change in proper body posture and alignment induces stresses on the body and internal organs they were not designed to take. The excess stress exceeds the rated tolerance for the internal organ, limb or outer body area and causes the problems described by Happeh Theory.

Huwy said:
Know what? These problems made me so miserable, at some point (around 18) I had to admit I may be wrong about some things I wasnt willing to admit that about. AFter that, I learnt a lot, and I changed for the better, and my life improved.

I hope I'm still capable of that by the time I'm your age, whatever that is.
No disrespect, just concern.

Nice try. I am way to experienced to let that bother me. When you think you can be more insulting and hurtful than a mob of 20 people, try again. I have taken on a mob of 20 people in a forums before and emerged victorious.

Like I am doing here.
 
Huwy said:
Hey to the other members following this post, could you please fill me in on the comics/cartoons/dick blog/soliciting, that is if they weren't "made up to slander" happeh. Just point me to the page/ website.
Not because I'm looking for a laugh, because it concerns me.

More importantly please fill me in on any possible contact with children.
This concerns me. (Please not a teacher... please not a teacher)

Hahahahaahah. ;) People are scum. See what I mean? You said all that stuff in that other big huge post. But it wasn't enough. Even though you were telling me how you wanted to learn and to talk, here you are, making comments. Just like I told you to your face that I suspected you would do.

I used to be shocked that adults could make sexual posts about children and whatnot to total strangers. That was before I learned it was a purposeful plot or method designed to win an arguement.

If you are in an argument you are losing, calmly and clearly point at the other person and say "You are a child molester". You just won the argument. Any normal person will be so mortified by the charge they will run away or go mute in shock. Most people who protests sound like they are protesting the question "Do you still beat your wife".

There are a few readily obvious ways for scum to win any argument anywhere. Call someone an anti semite. Call someone a racist. Call someone a Nazi. Call someone a child abuser. Employ any of those accusations against most people and you will win any discussion with no opposition.
 
Are any of you teachers? Or have you ever taught before? Have you ever noticed how when you are making an impression, when the students are interested in what you say and are taking it all in, they go totally silent? It is the silence of focused concentration and wonder about what is being said.

I see that going on here. I thought since everyone was educated, I would need to employ the big words and fancy phrases. Turns out that is not the case. Just like everyone else, it is the simple and obvious that gets people to pay attention. Pictures. There is no denying the similarity in the pictures. I told you I have 1000 of them. I will prove to you that I am correct and that Happeh Theory is completely valid. It will only take 1000 days as I post each new corroborating photo.

Just out of curiousity, how many times do you perform an experiment before you accept what your eyes see? I bet it is a lot less than 1000.

4Wankers.jpg


This new picture is just like the others. The man's head leans to the right. His shoulders are sloped downwards from left to right. His eyes, if you are observant are mismatched. He shows the signs predicted by Happeh Theory for excessive masturbation in his face. I will not go into them because they were disregarded last time.

This picture is also very good because it will force you to think whether you like it or not. This man was kidnapped by the USA, and sent to Syria to be tortured. I believe he was in jail for at least a year.

In jail, what is there to do? You are in a concrete block with a bed and toilet. That is it. 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for a year. You are being tortured and you are under stress all the time. What do you do?

You masturbate.

This man shows signs of chronic masturbation. It makes sense. He was in a jail cell with nothing to occupy his time. The stress from torture would cause him to seek relief from stress. Masturbation is relief from stress. My claim he looks like this due to excessive masturbation is a reasonable one based on his history. My claim that what you see in his face and body attitude is due to masturbation is a reasonable claim for any reasonable scientists to at least consider and ponder. Not outright reject.
 
Huwy said:
More importantly please fill me in on any possible contact with children.
This concerns me. (Please not a teacher... please not a teacher)

What is really funny is this shows how young and inexperienced you are. How you do not think clearly before you speak.

You hear children and try to start this trouble. You missed something very very important.

How do you define child?

You will be surprised, chagrined, and I hope ashamed, to know that I consider you a child. I would talk to someone else and describe you as "some child going to uni".

You must always, always, always, watch every single word a person says, and think about all the permutations and combinations of what is going on before you jump to conclusions. That is, if you want to grow up to be a powerful adult. Instead of someone people consider a weak and sloppy thinker.
 
Personology is a New Age variation of the ancient pseudoscience of physiognomy, which holds that outward appearance, especially the face, is the key to a person's predominant temper and character. The theory of personology, like graphology, seems to be based on sympathetic magic and intuition.

Personology was developed in the 1930s by Edward Jones, a Los Angeles judge, according to Naomi Tickle, author of It's All in the Face -The Key to Finding Your Life Purpose (1997). She is also the founder of the International Centre for Personology (not to be confused with the Personology Institute of San Diego nor the Institute for Advanced Studies in Personology and Psychopathology in Coral Gables, Florida). According to Ms. Tickle, the judge "became fascinated by the relationship between facial features and behavior patterns of the people who appeared before him in court." Then, like many naive people, he thought his personal observations were free of bias and constituted scientific data. Judge Jones even taught his "new science" to the public.

Judge Jones may have been very good at cold reading, but he did not do controlled experiments to minimize the effects of the self-deception and confirmation bias that hinder all of us from properly evaluating our experiences. He should have been especially concerned about the Forer effect, given the history of other similar attempts at divining character, such as astrology and phrenology.http://skepdic.com/personology.html

Your theory is moot, you have nothing even if you were willing to shows us 6 billion fotos, even children tip their head sideways!. :bugeye:

intro0.jpg


OOOPS there's a wanker, he's about to get it too from Happeh's gun, seen on the picture. LOL..

children14.jpg


Oh! my what have we got here, a cute little baby girl tiping her head to one side, what you make of this Happeh? Is she going to be a future excessive wanker according to your BS Theory?

Godless
 
Last edited:
I simply don't understand the "logic" of picking a picture of someone with their head tilted and calling them a masturbator. What stupidity. That is not to say that Heppah is summarily stupid, simply that this "theory" is. Actually I don't think it really qualifies as a theory as it's not testable as stated, unless you consider gathering head-tilted pictures of people and calling them masturbators "a test". It's more like a joke than a test, hence my liberal application of "jackass" - for trying to push a joke as real and not letting up once busted on it.

And Heppah, if you really, actually, truly believe this "theory" to be true... then yes, I can objectively say that at least in this regard "you don't think so good". You are generally summarily dismissed as a joke because the analysis you present is very very bad and you play the victim for it, as if it's the fault of others that your analysis is crap. Really, it's just bad. You ask that people be fair to you but when fairly challenged, you evade, misdirect and play the victim role. That doesn't win arguments or kindness, it just makes you look like a jerk - so that's how people treat you... you know... like you're a jerk. And yet you try to pretend you're surprised by it, when it's obviously what you seek.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top